Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens

T. Fesseha, W. Sakr, David Grignon, M. Banerjee, D. P. Wood, J. E. Pontes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic implication of a positive surgical margin at the prostatic apex to define the risk of failure after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Radical prostatectomy specimens of 590 patients operated on between 1990 and 1994 were reviewed by 2 uropathologists (D. G. and W. S.) to determine the percentage of patients with a positive margin at the apex in the absence of positive margins, extraprostatic extension or involvement of seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes. In this group of 33 patients, the significance of a positive apex could be determined without the influence of any other stage related prognostic factors. Treatment failure was defined as prostate specific antigen greater than 0.4. All 33 patients have been followed between 3.5 and 65.5 months (median 38.7). Results: Among 590 patients 236 (40%) had disease completely confined to the prostate. A total of 217 patients (37%) had either positive surgical margins (M+) or extraprostatic extension and of these, only 33 (5.5%) had in apical positive margin in an otherwise prostate confined tumor. Of 33 apical positive margin patients only 3 in whom surgery failed had progressively detectable prostate specific antigen 3.5 to 65.5 months after surgery. Conclusions: A positive surgical margin at the prostatic apex in the absence of positive margins or extraprostatic extension elsewhere does not confer a worse prognosis than organ confined disease. In this study the recurrence rate for patients with positive apical margins was the same as for those with confined disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2176-2179
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume158
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostatectomy
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Prostate
Seminal Vesicles
Treatment Failure
Lymph Nodes
Recurrence
Margins of Excision
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Prostate
  • Prostate-specific antigen
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens. / Fesseha, T.; Sakr, W.; Grignon, David; Banerjee, M.; Wood, D. P.; Pontes, J. E.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 158, No. 6, 12.1997, p. 2176-2179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fesseha, T. ; Sakr, W. ; Grignon, David ; Banerjee, M. ; Wood, D. P. ; Pontes, J. E. / Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens. In: Journal of Urology. 1997 ; Vol. 158, No. 6. pp. 2176-2179.
@article{bceb78ea8bcb44bfa71a0ce3623f7304,
title = "Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens",
abstract = "Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic implication of a positive surgical margin at the prostatic apex to define the risk of failure after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Radical prostatectomy specimens of 590 patients operated on between 1990 and 1994 were reviewed by 2 uropathologists (D. G. and W. S.) to determine the percentage of patients with a positive margin at the apex in the absence of positive margins, extraprostatic extension or involvement of seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes. In this group of 33 patients, the significance of a positive apex could be determined without the influence of any other stage related prognostic factors. Treatment failure was defined as prostate specific antigen greater than 0.4. All 33 patients have been followed between 3.5 and 65.5 months (median 38.7). Results: Among 590 patients 236 (40{\%}) had disease completely confined to the prostate. A total of 217 patients (37{\%}) had either positive surgical margins (M+) or extraprostatic extension and of these, only 33 (5.5{\%}) had in apical positive margin in an otherwise prostate confined tumor. Of 33 apical positive margin patients only 3 in whom surgery failed had progressively detectable prostate specific antigen 3.5 to 65.5 months after surgery. Conclusions: A positive surgical margin at the prostatic apex in the absence of positive margins or extraprostatic extension elsewhere does not confer a worse prognosis than organ confined disease. In this study the recurrence rate for patients with positive apical margins was the same as for those with confined disease.",
keywords = "Prostate, Prostate-specific antigen, Prostatectomy, Prostatic neoplasms",
author = "T. Fesseha and W. Sakr and David Grignon and M. Banerjee and Wood, {D. P.} and Pontes, {J. E.}",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68189-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "2176--2179",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prognostic implications of a positive apical margin in radical prostatectomy specimens

AU - Fesseha, T.

AU - Sakr, W.

AU - Grignon, David

AU - Banerjee, M.

AU - Wood, D. P.

AU - Pontes, J. E.

PY - 1997/12

Y1 - 1997/12

N2 - Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic implication of a positive surgical margin at the prostatic apex to define the risk of failure after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Radical prostatectomy specimens of 590 patients operated on between 1990 and 1994 were reviewed by 2 uropathologists (D. G. and W. S.) to determine the percentage of patients with a positive margin at the apex in the absence of positive margins, extraprostatic extension or involvement of seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes. In this group of 33 patients, the significance of a positive apex could be determined without the influence of any other stage related prognostic factors. Treatment failure was defined as prostate specific antigen greater than 0.4. All 33 patients have been followed between 3.5 and 65.5 months (median 38.7). Results: Among 590 patients 236 (40%) had disease completely confined to the prostate. A total of 217 patients (37%) had either positive surgical margins (M+) or extraprostatic extension and of these, only 33 (5.5%) had in apical positive margin in an otherwise prostate confined tumor. Of 33 apical positive margin patients only 3 in whom surgery failed had progressively detectable prostate specific antigen 3.5 to 65.5 months after surgery. Conclusions: A positive surgical margin at the prostatic apex in the absence of positive margins or extraprostatic extension elsewhere does not confer a worse prognosis than organ confined disease. In this study the recurrence rate for patients with positive apical margins was the same as for those with confined disease.

AB - Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic implication of a positive surgical margin at the prostatic apex to define the risk of failure after radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: Radical prostatectomy specimens of 590 patients operated on between 1990 and 1994 were reviewed by 2 uropathologists (D. G. and W. S.) to determine the percentage of patients with a positive margin at the apex in the absence of positive margins, extraprostatic extension or involvement of seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes. In this group of 33 patients, the significance of a positive apex could be determined without the influence of any other stage related prognostic factors. Treatment failure was defined as prostate specific antigen greater than 0.4. All 33 patients have been followed between 3.5 and 65.5 months (median 38.7). Results: Among 590 patients 236 (40%) had disease completely confined to the prostate. A total of 217 patients (37%) had either positive surgical margins (M+) or extraprostatic extension and of these, only 33 (5.5%) had in apical positive margin in an otherwise prostate confined tumor. Of 33 apical positive margin patients only 3 in whom surgery failed had progressively detectable prostate specific antigen 3.5 to 65.5 months after surgery. Conclusions: A positive surgical margin at the prostatic apex in the absence of positive margins or extraprostatic extension elsewhere does not confer a worse prognosis than organ confined disease. In this study the recurrence rate for patients with positive apical margins was the same as for those with confined disease.

KW - Prostate

KW - Prostate-specific antigen

KW - Prostatectomy

KW - Prostatic neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030772922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030772922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68189-8

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68189-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 9366338

AN - SCOPUS:0030772922

VL - 158

SP - 2176

EP - 2179

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 6

ER -