Progress in defining disease: Improved approaches and increased impact

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a series of recent papers, I have made three arguments about how to define "disease" and evaluate and apply possible definitions. First, I have argued that definitions should not be seen as traditional conceptual analyses, but instead as proposals about how to define and use the term "disease" in the future. Second, I have pointed out and attempted to address a challenge for dysfunction- requiring accounts of disease that I call the "line-drawing" problem: distinguishing between low-normal functioning and dysfunctioning. Finally, I have used a dysfunction-requiring approach to argue that some extremely prevalent conditions, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and ductal carcinoma in situ, are not diseases, but instead are risk factors. Four of the papers in this issue directly engage my previous work. In this commentary, I applaud the advances these authors make, address points of disagreement, and make suggestions about where the discussion should go next.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)485-502
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Medicine and Philosophy (United Kingdom)
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Cholesterol
Hypertension
buprofezin
In Situ
Blood Pressure
Line Drawing
Risk Factors

Keywords

  • Biological normativity
  • Disease
  • Dysfunction-requiring account
  • Line-drawing problem
  • Risk factor
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Medicine(all)
  • Philosophy

Cite this

Progress in defining disease : Improved approaches and increased impact. / Schwartz, Peter.

In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy (United Kingdom), Vol. 42, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 485-502.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f2b237f98b3245bbaf3b645d63629800,
title = "Progress in defining disease: Improved approaches and increased impact",
abstract = "In a series of recent papers, I have made three arguments about how to define {"}disease{"} and evaluate and apply possible definitions. First, I have argued that definitions should not be seen as traditional conceptual analyses, but instead as proposals about how to define and use the term {"}disease{"} in the future. Second, I have pointed out and attempted to address a challenge for dysfunction- requiring accounts of disease that I call the {"}line-drawing{"} problem: distinguishing between low-normal functioning and dysfunctioning. Finally, I have used a dysfunction-requiring approach to argue that some extremely prevalent conditions, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and ductal carcinoma in situ, are not diseases, but instead are risk factors. Four of the papers in this issue directly engage my previous work. In this commentary, I applaud the advances these authors make, address points of disagreement, and make suggestions about where the discussion should go next.",
keywords = "Biological normativity, Disease, Dysfunction-requiring account, Line-drawing problem, Risk factor, Screening",
author = "Peter Schwartz",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jmp/jhx012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "485--502",
journal = "Journal of Medicine and Philosophy",
issn = "0360-5310",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Progress in defining disease

T2 - Improved approaches and increased impact

AU - Schwartz, Peter

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - In a series of recent papers, I have made three arguments about how to define "disease" and evaluate and apply possible definitions. First, I have argued that definitions should not be seen as traditional conceptual analyses, but instead as proposals about how to define and use the term "disease" in the future. Second, I have pointed out and attempted to address a challenge for dysfunction- requiring accounts of disease that I call the "line-drawing" problem: distinguishing between low-normal functioning and dysfunctioning. Finally, I have used a dysfunction-requiring approach to argue that some extremely prevalent conditions, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and ductal carcinoma in situ, are not diseases, but instead are risk factors. Four of the papers in this issue directly engage my previous work. In this commentary, I applaud the advances these authors make, address points of disagreement, and make suggestions about where the discussion should go next.

AB - In a series of recent papers, I have made three arguments about how to define "disease" and evaluate and apply possible definitions. First, I have argued that definitions should not be seen as traditional conceptual analyses, but instead as proposals about how to define and use the term "disease" in the future. Second, I have pointed out and attempted to address a challenge for dysfunction- requiring accounts of disease that I call the "line-drawing" problem: distinguishing between low-normal functioning and dysfunctioning. Finally, I have used a dysfunction-requiring approach to argue that some extremely prevalent conditions, such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and ductal carcinoma in situ, are not diseases, but instead are risk factors. Four of the papers in this issue directly engage my previous work. In this commentary, I applaud the advances these authors make, address points of disagreement, and make suggestions about where the discussion should go next.

KW - Biological normativity

KW - Disease

KW - Dysfunction-requiring account

KW - Line-drawing problem

KW - Risk factor

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026470446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026470446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jmp/jhx012

DO - 10.1093/jmp/jhx012

M3 - Article

C2 - 28859465

AN - SCOPUS:85026470446

VL - 42

SP - 485

EP - 502

JO - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy

JF - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy

SN - 0360-5310

IS - 4

ER -