Promoting ADL independence in vulnerable, community-dwelling older adults: A pilot RrCT comparing 3-Sstep Workout for Llife versus resistance exercise

Chiung ju Liu, Huiping Xu, Ni Cole R. Keith, Daniel Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Resistance exercise is effective to increase muscle strength for older adults; however, its effect on the outcome of activities of daily living is often limited. The purpose of this study was to examine whether 3-Step Workout for Life (which combines resistance exercise, functional exercise, and activities of daily living exercise) would be more beneficial than resistance exercise alone. Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Fifty-two inactive, community-dwelling older adults (mean age =73 years) with muscle weakness and difficulty in activities of daily living were randomized to receive 3-Step Workout for Life or resistance exercise only. Participants in the 3-Step Workout for Life Group performed functional movements and selected activities of daily living at home in addition to resistance exercise. Participants in the Resistance Exercise Only Group performed resistance exercise only. Both groups were comparable in exercise intensity (moderate), duration (50-60 minutes each time for 10 weeks), and frequency (three times a week). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, a standard performance test on activities of daily living, was administered at baseline, postintervention, and 6 months after intervention completion. Results: At postintervention, the 3-Step Workout for Life Group showed improvement on the outcome measure (mean change from baseline =0.29, P=0.02), but the improvement was not greater than the Resistance Exercise Only Group (group mean difference =0.24, P=0.13). However, the Resistance Exercise Only Group showed a significant decline (mean change from baseline =-0.25, P=0.01) 6 months after the intervention completion. Meanwhile, the superior effect of 3-Step Workout for Life was observed (group mean difference =0.37, P,0.01). Conclusion: Compared to resistance exercise alone, 3-Step Workout for Life improves the performance of activities of daily living and attenuates the disablement process in older adults.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1141-1149
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Interventions in Aging
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 19 2017

Fingerprint

Independent Living
Activities of Daily Living
Single-Blind Method
Motor Skills
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Muscle Weakness
Muscle Strength
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Activities of daily living
  • Aging in place
  • Disablement process
  • Functional exercise
  • Resistance exercise

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

@article{6c8746399b654df8bc7824a454779160,
title = "Promoting ADL independence in vulnerable, community-dwelling older adults: A pilot RrCT comparing 3-Sstep Workout for Llife versus resistance exercise",
abstract = "Background: Resistance exercise is effective to increase muscle strength for older adults; however, its effect on the outcome of activities of daily living is often limited. The purpose of this study was to examine whether 3-Step Workout for Life (which combines resistance exercise, functional exercise, and activities of daily living exercise) would be more beneficial than resistance exercise alone. Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Fifty-two inactive, community-dwelling older adults (mean age =73 years) with muscle weakness and difficulty in activities of daily living were randomized to receive 3-Step Workout for Life or resistance exercise only. Participants in the 3-Step Workout for Life Group performed functional movements and selected activities of daily living at home in addition to resistance exercise. Participants in the Resistance Exercise Only Group performed resistance exercise only. Both groups were comparable in exercise intensity (moderate), duration (50-60 minutes each time for 10 weeks), and frequency (three times a week). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, a standard performance test on activities of daily living, was administered at baseline, postintervention, and 6 months after intervention completion. Results: At postintervention, the 3-Step Workout for Life Group showed improvement on the outcome measure (mean change from baseline =0.29, P=0.02), but the improvement was not greater than the Resistance Exercise Only Group (group mean difference =0.24, P=0.13). However, the Resistance Exercise Only Group showed a significant decline (mean change from baseline =-0.25, P=0.01) 6 months after the intervention completion. Meanwhile, the superior effect of 3-Step Workout for Life was observed (group mean difference =0.37, P,0.01). Conclusion: Compared to resistance exercise alone, 3-Step Workout for Life improves the performance of activities of daily living and attenuates the disablement process in older adults.",
keywords = "Activities of daily living, Aging in place, Disablement process, Functional exercise, Resistance exercise",
author = "Liu, {Chiung ju} and Huiping Xu and Keith, {Ni Cole R.} and Daniel Clark",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "19",
doi = "10.2147/CIA.S136678",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "1141--1149",
journal = "Clinical Interventions in Aging",
issn = "1176-9092",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting ADL independence in vulnerable, community-dwelling older adults

T2 - A pilot RrCT comparing 3-Sstep Workout for Llife versus resistance exercise

AU - Liu, Chiung ju

AU - Xu, Huiping

AU - Keith, Ni Cole R.

AU - Clark, Daniel

PY - 2017/7/19

Y1 - 2017/7/19

N2 - Background: Resistance exercise is effective to increase muscle strength for older adults; however, its effect on the outcome of activities of daily living is often limited. The purpose of this study was to examine whether 3-Step Workout for Life (which combines resistance exercise, functional exercise, and activities of daily living exercise) would be more beneficial than resistance exercise alone. Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Fifty-two inactive, community-dwelling older adults (mean age =73 years) with muscle weakness and difficulty in activities of daily living were randomized to receive 3-Step Workout for Life or resistance exercise only. Participants in the 3-Step Workout for Life Group performed functional movements and selected activities of daily living at home in addition to resistance exercise. Participants in the Resistance Exercise Only Group performed resistance exercise only. Both groups were comparable in exercise intensity (moderate), duration (50-60 minutes each time for 10 weeks), and frequency (three times a week). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, a standard performance test on activities of daily living, was administered at baseline, postintervention, and 6 months after intervention completion. Results: At postintervention, the 3-Step Workout for Life Group showed improvement on the outcome measure (mean change from baseline =0.29, P=0.02), but the improvement was not greater than the Resistance Exercise Only Group (group mean difference =0.24, P=0.13). However, the Resistance Exercise Only Group showed a significant decline (mean change from baseline =-0.25, P=0.01) 6 months after the intervention completion. Meanwhile, the superior effect of 3-Step Workout for Life was observed (group mean difference =0.37, P,0.01). Conclusion: Compared to resistance exercise alone, 3-Step Workout for Life improves the performance of activities of daily living and attenuates the disablement process in older adults.

AB - Background: Resistance exercise is effective to increase muscle strength for older adults; however, its effect on the outcome of activities of daily living is often limited. The purpose of this study was to examine whether 3-Step Workout for Life (which combines resistance exercise, functional exercise, and activities of daily living exercise) would be more beneficial than resistance exercise alone. Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Fifty-two inactive, community-dwelling older adults (mean age =73 years) with muscle weakness and difficulty in activities of daily living were randomized to receive 3-Step Workout for Life or resistance exercise only. Participants in the 3-Step Workout for Life Group performed functional movements and selected activities of daily living at home in addition to resistance exercise. Participants in the Resistance Exercise Only Group performed resistance exercise only. Both groups were comparable in exercise intensity (moderate), duration (50-60 minutes each time for 10 weeks), and frequency (three times a week). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, a standard performance test on activities of daily living, was administered at baseline, postintervention, and 6 months after intervention completion. Results: At postintervention, the 3-Step Workout for Life Group showed improvement on the outcome measure (mean change from baseline =0.29, P=0.02), but the improvement was not greater than the Resistance Exercise Only Group (group mean difference =0.24, P=0.13). However, the Resistance Exercise Only Group showed a significant decline (mean change from baseline =-0.25, P=0.01) 6 months after the intervention completion. Meanwhile, the superior effect of 3-Step Workout for Life was observed (group mean difference =0.37, P,0.01). Conclusion: Compared to resistance exercise alone, 3-Step Workout for Life improves the performance of activities of daily living and attenuates the disablement process in older adults.

KW - Activities of daily living

KW - Aging in place

KW - Disablement process

KW - Functional exercise

KW - Resistance exercise

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026486498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026486498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/CIA.S136678

DO - 10.2147/CIA.S136678

M3 - Article

C2 - 28769559

AN - SCOPUS:85026486498

VL - 12

SP - 1141

EP - 1149

JO - Clinical Interventions in Aging

JF - Clinical Interventions in Aging

SN - 1176-9092

ER -