Prospective analysis of quality of life after surgical resection for esophageal cancer: Preliminary results

Jo Ann Brooks, Kenneth Kesler, Cynthia S. Johnson, Donato Ciaccia, John Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This pilot study prospectively evaluates the impact of esophageal resection on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and mood states at diagnosis and during the first year after surgery. Methods: Participants included 38 patients with planned esophageal resection. Two instruments were used: the Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy core instrument with the esophageal subscale (FACT-E), and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Subjects were evaluated after diagnosis and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgical resection. Results: All subjects demonstrated a decrease in overall HRQL after resection with a gradual return toward baseline by month 9. The functional and physical subscales of the FACT-E demonstrated the largest decrease at 1 month with a gradual return toward baseline. The POMS subscales that demonstrated the highest amount of disorder after surgery were tension, fatigue, and vigor. Although the trends were similar between patients undergoing surgery alone (n = 18) and those with neoadjuvant therapy (n = 20), the group that had received surgery alone demonstrated a higher HRQL and less mood disorder during the postoperative period, as compared with the neoadjuvant group. Conclusions: Patient perceptions of HRQL and mood states change over the first 12 months after esophageal resection. Although no statistically significant differences were found in this study, several trends were identified. Ongoing assessments of these changes are important, and interventions need to be developed and implemented to produce an effective decrease in the impact of esophageal resection on HRQL and mood states, particularly after trimodality therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-194
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume81
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002

Fingerprint

Esophageal Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Mood Disorders
Postoperative Period
Fatigue
Therapeutics
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Esophageal cancer
  • Health-status
  • Psychological status
  • Quality of life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Prospective analysis of quality of life after surgical resection for esophageal cancer : Preliminary results. / Brooks, Jo Ann; Kesler, Kenneth; Johnson, Cynthia S.; Ciaccia, Donato; Brown, John.

In: Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 81, No. 4, 01.12.2002, p. 185-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ac676f9034e540e4bcc19c758dc898ce,
title = "Prospective analysis of quality of life after surgical resection for esophageal cancer: Preliminary results",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: This pilot study prospectively evaluates the impact of esophageal resection on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and mood states at diagnosis and during the first year after surgery. Methods: Participants included 38 patients with planned esophageal resection. Two instruments were used: the Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy core instrument with the esophageal subscale (FACT-E), and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Subjects were evaluated after diagnosis and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgical resection. Results: All subjects demonstrated a decrease in overall HRQL after resection with a gradual return toward baseline by month 9. The functional and physical subscales of the FACT-E demonstrated the largest decrease at 1 month with a gradual return toward baseline. The POMS subscales that demonstrated the highest amount of disorder after surgery were tension, fatigue, and vigor. Although the trends were similar between patients undergoing surgery alone (n = 18) and those with neoadjuvant therapy (n = 20), the group that had received surgery alone demonstrated a higher HRQL and less mood disorder during the postoperative period, as compared with the neoadjuvant group. Conclusions: Patient perceptions of HRQL and mood states change over the first 12 months after esophageal resection. Although no statistically significant differences were found in this study, several trends were identified. Ongoing assessments of these changes are important, and interventions need to be developed and implemented to produce an effective decrease in the impact of esophageal resection on HRQL and mood states, particularly after trimodality therapy.",
keywords = "Esophageal cancer, Health-status, Psychological status, Quality of life",
author = "Brooks, {Jo Ann} and Kenneth Kesler and Johnson, {Cynthia S.} and Donato Ciaccia and John Brown",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jso.10175",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "185--194",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "0022-4790",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective analysis of quality of life after surgical resection for esophageal cancer

T2 - Preliminary results

AU - Brooks, Jo Ann

AU - Kesler, Kenneth

AU - Johnson, Cynthia S.

AU - Ciaccia, Donato

AU - Brown, John

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - Background and Objectives: This pilot study prospectively evaluates the impact of esophageal resection on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and mood states at diagnosis and during the first year after surgery. Methods: Participants included 38 patients with planned esophageal resection. Two instruments were used: the Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy core instrument with the esophageal subscale (FACT-E), and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Subjects were evaluated after diagnosis and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgical resection. Results: All subjects demonstrated a decrease in overall HRQL after resection with a gradual return toward baseline by month 9. The functional and physical subscales of the FACT-E demonstrated the largest decrease at 1 month with a gradual return toward baseline. The POMS subscales that demonstrated the highest amount of disorder after surgery were tension, fatigue, and vigor. Although the trends were similar between patients undergoing surgery alone (n = 18) and those with neoadjuvant therapy (n = 20), the group that had received surgery alone demonstrated a higher HRQL and less mood disorder during the postoperative period, as compared with the neoadjuvant group. Conclusions: Patient perceptions of HRQL and mood states change over the first 12 months after esophageal resection. Although no statistically significant differences were found in this study, several trends were identified. Ongoing assessments of these changes are important, and interventions need to be developed and implemented to produce an effective decrease in the impact of esophageal resection on HRQL and mood states, particularly after trimodality therapy.

AB - Background and Objectives: This pilot study prospectively evaluates the impact of esophageal resection on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and mood states at diagnosis and during the first year after surgery. Methods: Participants included 38 patients with planned esophageal resection. Two instruments were used: the Functional Assessment in Cancer Therapy core instrument with the esophageal subscale (FACT-E), and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Subjects were evaluated after diagnosis and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgical resection. Results: All subjects demonstrated a decrease in overall HRQL after resection with a gradual return toward baseline by month 9. The functional and physical subscales of the FACT-E demonstrated the largest decrease at 1 month with a gradual return toward baseline. The POMS subscales that demonstrated the highest amount of disorder after surgery were tension, fatigue, and vigor. Although the trends were similar between patients undergoing surgery alone (n = 18) and those with neoadjuvant therapy (n = 20), the group that had received surgery alone demonstrated a higher HRQL and less mood disorder during the postoperative period, as compared with the neoadjuvant group. Conclusions: Patient perceptions of HRQL and mood states change over the first 12 months after esophageal resection. Although no statistically significant differences were found in this study, several trends were identified. Ongoing assessments of these changes are important, and interventions need to be developed and implemented to produce an effective decrease in the impact of esophageal resection on HRQL and mood states, particularly after trimodality therapy.

KW - Esophageal cancer

KW - Health-status

KW - Psychological status

KW - Quality of life

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036893270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036893270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jso.10175

DO - 10.1002/jso.10175

M3 - Article

C2 - 12451623

AN - SCOPUS:0036893270

VL - 81

SP - 185

EP - 194

JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 0022-4790

IS - 4

ER -