Prospective comparison of the Heine retinometer with the Mentor Guyton- Minkowski potential acuity meter for the assessment of potential visual acuity before cataract surgery

A. Tharp, Louis Cantor, C. W. Yung, J. Shoemaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Various techniques and devices have been developed to aid in the assessment of potential visual acuity prior to cataract surgery. We report a prospective comparison of two such assessments, one made using a new instrument, the hand-held Heine retinometer (HR) (Heine Instruments, Germany), and the other using the Mentor Guyton-Minkowski potential acuity meter (PAM) (Mentor, Inc, Norwell, Mass). A total of 37 eyes were assessed using both instruments just before cataract surgery. Three eyes were excluded from analysis due to postoperative complications affecting visual acuity that could not have been predicted with either instrument. The false-negative rate was 44% for the PAM and 32% for the HR. There were no false-positive results with either instrument. Neither instrument was particularly accurate in predicting actual final visual acuity (r2 = 0.290 and 0.144 for the PAM and HR, respectively). The HR was deemed easier to use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)576-579
Number of pages4
JournalOphthalmic Surgery
Volume25
Issue number9
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mentors
Cataract
Visual Acuity
Germany
Hand
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

@article{5d0d4e8878f04eab987cf5af930e4e23,
title = "Prospective comparison of the Heine retinometer with the Mentor Guyton- Minkowski potential acuity meter for the assessment of potential visual acuity before cataract surgery",
abstract = "Various techniques and devices have been developed to aid in the assessment of potential visual acuity prior to cataract surgery. We report a prospective comparison of two such assessments, one made using a new instrument, the hand-held Heine retinometer (HR) (Heine Instruments, Germany), and the other using the Mentor Guyton-Minkowski potential acuity meter (PAM) (Mentor, Inc, Norwell, Mass). A total of 37 eyes were assessed using both instruments just before cataract surgery. Three eyes were excluded from analysis due to postoperative complications affecting visual acuity that could not have been predicted with either instrument. The false-negative rate was 44{\%} for the PAM and 32{\%} for the HR. There were no false-positive results with either instrument. Neither instrument was particularly accurate in predicting actual final visual acuity (r2 = 0.290 and 0.144 for the PAM and HR, respectively). The HR was deemed easier to use.",
author = "A. Tharp and Louis Cantor and Yung, {C. W.} and J. Shoemaker",
year = "1994",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "576--579",
journal = "Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina",
issn = "2325-8160",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective comparison of the Heine retinometer with the Mentor Guyton- Minkowski potential acuity meter for the assessment of potential visual acuity before cataract surgery

AU - Tharp, A.

AU - Cantor, Louis

AU - Yung, C. W.

AU - Shoemaker, J.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Various techniques and devices have been developed to aid in the assessment of potential visual acuity prior to cataract surgery. We report a prospective comparison of two such assessments, one made using a new instrument, the hand-held Heine retinometer (HR) (Heine Instruments, Germany), and the other using the Mentor Guyton-Minkowski potential acuity meter (PAM) (Mentor, Inc, Norwell, Mass). A total of 37 eyes were assessed using both instruments just before cataract surgery. Three eyes were excluded from analysis due to postoperative complications affecting visual acuity that could not have been predicted with either instrument. The false-negative rate was 44% for the PAM and 32% for the HR. There were no false-positive results with either instrument. Neither instrument was particularly accurate in predicting actual final visual acuity (r2 = 0.290 and 0.144 for the PAM and HR, respectively). The HR was deemed easier to use.

AB - Various techniques and devices have been developed to aid in the assessment of potential visual acuity prior to cataract surgery. We report a prospective comparison of two such assessments, one made using a new instrument, the hand-held Heine retinometer (HR) (Heine Instruments, Germany), and the other using the Mentor Guyton-Minkowski potential acuity meter (PAM) (Mentor, Inc, Norwell, Mass). A total of 37 eyes were assessed using both instruments just before cataract surgery. Three eyes were excluded from analysis due to postoperative complications affecting visual acuity that could not have been predicted with either instrument. The false-negative rate was 44% for the PAM and 32% for the HR. There were no false-positive results with either instrument. Neither instrument was particularly accurate in predicting actual final visual acuity (r2 = 0.290 and 0.144 for the PAM and HR, respectively). The HR was deemed easier to use.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028037056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028037056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 576

EP - 579

JO - Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina

JF - Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina

SN - 2325-8160

IS - 9

ER -