Prospective evaluation of the performance and interobserver variation in endoscopic ultrasound staging of rectal cancer

Ihab I. El Hajj, John DeWitt, Stuart Sherman, Thomas Imperiale, Julia K. Leblanc, Lee McHenry, Gregory A. Cote, Cynthia S. Johnson, Mohammad Al-Haddad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Treatment and prognosis of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) are dependent on accurate locoregional staging. Objectives The aim of this study was to measure the performance characteristics of rectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) compared with surgical pathology, and to assess the interobserver variation of rectal EUS in the staging of RAC. Patients and methods Patients referred for rectal EUS staging of a recently diagnosed RAC were prospectively enrolled between 2012 and 2016. Tandem EUS exams were performed by two independent endosonographers (ES1 and ES2) blinded to each other's findings. Results Ninety-five patients were enrolled. Seventy-five (79%) underwent curative intent tumor resection, including 30 without neoadjuvant therapy. In this latter group, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography staging were 75, 83, and 82% for uT1; 50, 65, and 58% for uT2; 56, 81, and 73% for T3; 72, 44, and 63% for N0, and 38, 75, and 63% for N1, respectively. Experienced operators rendered a more accurate N stage and were less likely to overstage compared with less experienced ones (P=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). Overall, T staging agreement between endosonographers was substantial (κ=0.61) and N stage agreement was moderate (κ=0.45). Conclusion Rectal EUS is more accurate in staging T1 and T3 tumors compared with T2 tumors. Interobserver agreement of rectal EUS in rectal cancer staging is generally good.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1013-1018
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
Rectal Neoplasms
Adenocarcinoma
Neoplasms
Surgical Pathology
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Neoplasm Staging
Ultrasonography
Sensitivity and Specificity
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • endoscopic ultrasound
  • interobserver variation
  • rectal cancer
  • staging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Prospective evaluation of the performance and interobserver variation in endoscopic ultrasound staging of rectal cancer. / El Hajj, Ihab I.; DeWitt, John; Sherman, Stuart; Imperiale, Thomas; Leblanc, Julia K.; McHenry, Lee; Cote, Gregory A.; Johnson, Cynthia S.; Al-Haddad, Mohammad.

In: European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vol. 30, No. 9, 01.09.2018, p. 1013-1018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e681b883aa649469d147f02d12f7152,
title = "Prospective evaluation of the performance and interobserver variation in endoscopic ultrasound staging of rectal cancer",
abstract = "Background Treatment and prognosis of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) are dependent on accurate locoregional staging. Objectives The aim of this study was to measure the performance characteristics of rectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) compared with surgical pathology, and to assess the interobserver variation of rectal EUS in the staging of RAC. Patients and methods Patients referred for rectal EUS staging of a recently diagnosed RAC were prospectively enrolled between 2012 and 2016. Tandem EUS exams were performed by two independent endosonographers (ES1 and ES2) blinded to each other's findings. Results Ninety-five patients were enrolled. Seventy-five (79{\%}) underwent curative intent tumor resection, including 30 without neoadjuvant therapy. In this latter group, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography staging were 75, 83, and 82{\%} for uT1; 50, 65, and 58{\%} for uT2; 56, 81, and 73{\%} for T3; 72, 44, and 63{\%} for N0, and 38, 75, and 63{\%} for N1, respectively. Experienced operators rendered a more accurate N stage and were less likely to overstage compared with less experienced ones (P=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). Overall, T staging agreement between endosonographers was substantial (κ=0.61) and N stage agreement was moderate (κ=0.45). Conclusion Rectal EUS is more accurate in staging T1 and T3 tumors compared with T2 tumors. Interobserver agreement of rectal EUS in rectal cancer staging is generally good.",
keywords = "endoscopic ultrasound, interobserver variation, rectal cancer, staging",
author = "{El Hajj}, {Ihab I.} and John DeWitt and Stuart Sherman and Thomas Imperiale and Leblanc, {Julia K.} and Lee McHenry and Cote, {Gregory A.} and Johnson, {Cynthia S.} and Mohammad Al-Haddad",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MEG.0000000000001176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "1013--1018",
journal = "European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "0954-691X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prospective evaluation of the performance and interobserver variation in endoscopic ultrasound staging of rectal cancer

AU - El Hajj, Ihab I.

AU - DeWitt, John

AU - Sherman, Stuart

AU - Imperiale, Thomas

AU - Leblanc, Julia K.

AU - McHenry, Lee

AU - Cote, Gregory A.

AU - Johnson, Cynthia S.

AU - Al-Haddad, Mohammad

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Background Treatment and prognosis of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) are dependent on accurate locoregional staging. Objectives The aim of this study was to measure the performance characteristics of rectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) compared with surgical pathology, and to assess the interobserver variation of rectal EUS in the staging of RAC. Patients and methods Patients referred for rectal EUS staging of a recently diagnosed RAC were prospectively enrolled between 2012 and 2016. Tandem EUS exams were performed by two independent endosonographers (ES1 and ES2) blinded to each other's findings. Results Ninety-five patients were enrolled. Seventy-five (79%) underwent curative intent tumor resection, including 30 without neoadjuvant therapy. In this latter group, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography staging were 75, 83, and 82% for uT1; 50, 65, and 58% for uT2; 56, 81, and 73% for T3; 72, 44, and 63% for N0, and 38, 75, and 63% for N1, respectively. Experienced operators rendered a more accurate N stage and were less likely to overstage compared with less experienced ones (P=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). Overall, T staging agreement between endosonographers was substantial (κ=0.61) and N stage agreement was moderate (κ=0.45). Conclusion Rectal EUS is more accurate in staging T1 and T3 tumors compared with T2 tumors. Interobserver agreement of rectal EUS in rectal cancer staging is generally good.

AB - Background Treatment and prognosis of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) are dependent on accurate locoregional staging. Objectives The aim of this study was to measure the performance characteristics of rectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) compared with surgical pathology, and to assess the interobserver variation of rectal EUS in the staging of RAC. Patients and methods Patients referred for rectal EUS staging of a recently diagnosed RAC were prospectively enrolled between 2012 and 2016. Tandem EUS exams were performed by two independent endosonographers (ES1 and ES2) blinded to each other's findings. Results Ninety-five patients were enrolled. Seventy-five (79%) underwent curative intent tumor resection, including 30 without neoadjuvant therapy. In this latter group, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography staging were 75, 83, and 82% for uT1; 50, 65, and 58% for uT2; 56, 81, and 73% for T3; 72, 44, and 63% for N0, and 38, 75, and 63% for N1, respectively. Experienced operators rendered a more accurate N stage and were less likely to overstage compared with less experienced ones (P=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). Overall, T staging agreement between endosonographers was substantial (κ=0.61) and N stage agreement was moderate (κ=0.45). Conclusion Rectal EUS is more accurate in staging T1 and T3 tumors compared with T2 tumors. Interobserver agreement of rectal EUS in rectal cancer staging is generally good.

KW - endoscopic ultrasound

KW - interobserver variation

KW - rectal cancer

KW - staging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051123352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051123352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001176

DO - 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001176

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 1013

EP - 1018

JO - European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 0954-691X

IS - 9

ER -