Protecting Ideas: Ethical and Legal Considerations When a Grant’s Principal Investigator Changes

Leonidas Koniaris, Mary I. Coombs, Eric M. Meslin, Teresa Zimmers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Ethical issues related the responsible conduct of research involve questions concerning the rights and obligations of investigators to propose, design, implement, and publish research. When a principal investigator (PI) transfers institutions during a grant cycle, financial and recognition issues need to be addressed to preserve all parties’ obligations and best interests in a mutually beneficial way. Although grants often transfer with the PI, sometimes they do not. Maintaining a grant at an institution after the PI leaves does not negate the grantee institution’s obligation to recognize the PI’s original ideas, contributions, and potential rights to some forms of expression and compensation. Issues include maintaining a role for the PI in determining how to take credit for, share and publish results that involve his or her original ideas. Ascribing proper credit can become a thorny issue. This paper provides a framework for addressing situations and disagreements that may occur when a new PI continues the work after the original PI transfers. Included are suggestions for proactively developing institutional mechanisms that address such issues. Considerations include how to develop solutions that comply with the responsible conduct of research, equitably resolve claims regarding reporting of results, and avoid the possibility of plagiarism.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScience and Engineering Ethics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 31 2015

Fingerprint

Organized Financing
grant
obligation
Research Personnel
credit
Plagiarism
Research
Compensation and Redress
Ethics
Obligation

Keywords

  • Authorship
  • Grant awards
  • Grant stipulations
  • Grant transfers
  • PI transfer
  • Plagiarism
  • Principal investigator

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{025d871536f54e4dbef093e2e2c5a6e7,
title = "Protecting Ideas: Ethical and Legal Considerations When a Grant’s Principal Investigator Changes",
abstract = "Ethical issues related the responsible conduct of research involve questions concerning the rights and obligations of investigators to propose, design, implement, and publish research. When a principal investigator (PI) transfers institutions during a grant cycle, financial and recognition issues need to be addressed to preserve all parties’ obligations and best interests in a mutually beneficial way. Although grants often transfer with the PI, sometimes they do not. Maintaining a grant at an institution after the PI leaves does not negate the grantee institution’s obligation to recognize the PI’s original ideas, contributions, and potential rights to some forms of expression and compensation. Issues include maintaining a role for the PI in determining how to take credit for, share and publish results that involve his or her original ideas. Ascribing proper credit can become a thorny issue. This paper provides a framework for addressing situations and disagreements that may occur when a new PI continues the work after the original PI transfers. Included are suggestions for proactively developing institutional mechanisms that address such issues. Considerations include how to develop solutions that comply with the responsible conduct of research, equitably resolve claims regarding reporting of results, and avoid the possibility of plagiarism.",
keywords = "Authorship, Grant awards, Grant stipulations, Grant transfers, PI transfer, Plagiarism, Principal investigator",
author = "Leonidas Koniaris and Coombs, {Mary I.} and Meslin, {Eric M.} and Teresa Zimmers",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1007/s11948-015-9688-3",
language = "English",
journal = "Science and Engineering Ethics",
issn = "1353-3452",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protecting Ideas

T2 - Ethical and Legal Considerations When a Grant’s Principal Investigator Changes

AU - Koniaris, Leonidas

AU - Coombs, Mary I.

AU - Meslin, Eric M.

AU - Zimmers, Teresa

PY - 2015/7/31

Y1 - 2015/7/31

N2 - Ethical issues related the responsible conduct of research involve questions concerning the rights and obligations of investigators to propose, design, implement, and publish research. When a principal investigator (PI) transfers institutions during a grant cycle, financial and recognition issues need to be addressed to preserve all parties’ obligations and best interests in a mutually beneficial way. Although grants often transfer with the PI, sometimes they do not. Maintaining a grant at an institution after the PI leaves does not negate the grantee institution’s obligation to recognize the PI’s original ideas, contributions, and potential rights to some forms of expression and compensation. Issues include maintaining a role for the PI in determining how to take credit for, share and publish results that involve his or her original ideas. Ascribing proper credit can become a thorny issue. This paper provides a framework for addressing situations and disagreements that may occur when a new PI continues the work after the original PI transfers. Included are suggestions for proactively developing institutional mechanisms that address such issues. Considerations include how to develop solutions that comply with the responsible conduct of research, equitably resolve claims regarding reporting of results, and avoid the possibility of plagiarism.

AB - Ethical issues related the responsible conduct of research involve questions concerning the rights and obligations of investigators to propose, design, implement, and publish research. When a principal investigator (PI) transfers institutions during a grant cycle, financial and recognition issues need to be addressed to preserve all parties’ obligations and best interests in a mutually beneficial way. Although grants often transfer with the PI, sometimes they do not. Maintaining a grant at an institution after the PI leaves does not negate the grantee institution’s obligation to recognize the PI’s original ideas, contributions, and potential rights to some forms of expression and compensation. Issues include maintaining a role for the PI in determining how to take credit for, share and publish results that involve his or her original ideas. Ascribing proper credit can become a thorny issue. This paper provides a framework for addressing situations and disagreements that may occur when a new PI continues the work after the original PI transfers. Included are suggestions for proactively developing institutional mechanisms that address such issues. Considerations include how to develop solutions that comply with the responsible conduct of research, equitably resolve claims regarding reporting of results, and avoid the possibility of plagiarism.

KW - Authorship

KW - Grant awards

KW - Grant stipulations

KW - Grant transfers

KW - PI transfer

KW - Plagiarism

KW - Principal investigator

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938542765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938542765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11948-015-9688-3

DO - 10.1007/s11948-015-9688-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 26228741

AN - SCOPUS:84938542765

JO - Science and Engineering Ethics

JF - Science and Engineering Ethics

SN - 1353-3452

ER -