Protein content of human apatite and brushite kidney stones: Significant correlation with morphologic measures

Rocky Pramanik, John R. Asplin, Molly E. Jackson, James Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Apatite and brushite kidney stones share calcium and phosphate as their main inorganic components. We tested the hypothesis that these stone types differ in the amount of proteins present in the stones. Intact stones were intensively analyzed by microcomputed tomography (micro CT) for both morphology (including the volume of voids, i.e., space devoid of X-ray dense material) and mineral type. To extract all proteins present in kidney stones in soluble form we developed a three-step extraction procedure using the ground stone powder. Apatite stones had significantly higher levels of total protein content and void volume compared to brushite stones. The void volume was highly correlated with the total protein contents in all stones (r2 = 0.61, P < 0.0001), and brushite stones contained significantly fewer void regions and proteins than did apatite stones (3.2 ± 4.5% voids for brushite vs. 10.8 ± 11.2% for apatite, P < 0.005; 4.1 ± 1.6% protein for brushite vs. 6.0 ± 2.4% for apatite, P < 0.03). Morphological observations other than void volume did not correlate with protein content of stones, and neither did the presence or absence of minor mineral components. Our results show that protein content of brushite and apatite stones is higher than that was previously thought, and also suggest that micro CT-visible void regions are related to the presence of protein.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-258
Number of pages8
JournalUrological Research
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Fingerprint

Apatites
Kidney Calculi
Proteins
X-Ray Microtomography
Minerals
dibasic calcium phosphate dihydrate
Powders
X-Rays

Keywords

  • Micro CT
  • Organic matrix
  • Urolithiasis
  • Void volume

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Protein content of human apatite and brushite kidney stones : Significant correlation with morphologic measures. / Pramanik, Rocky; Asplin, John R.; Jackson, Molly E.; Williams, James.

In: Urological Research, Vol. 36, No. 5, 10.2008, p. 251-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pramanik, Rocky ; Asplin, John R. ; Jackson, Molly E. ; Williams, James. / Protein content of human apatite and brushite kidney stones : Significant correlation with morphologic measures. In: Urological Research. 2008 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 251-258.
@article{2a92b57ce2764189bc1f40792d5e5e5a,
title = "Protein content of human apatite and brushite kidney stones: Significant correlation with morphologic measures",
abstract = "Apatite and brushite kidney stones share calcium and phosphate as their main inorganic components. We tested the hypothesis that these stone types differ in the amount of proteins present in the stones. Intact stones were intensively analyzed by microcomputed tomography (micro CT) for both morphology (including the volume of voids, i.e., space devoid of X-ray dense material) and mineral type. To extract all proteins present in kidney stones in soluble form we developed a three-step extraction procedure using the ground stone powder. Apatite stones had significantly higher levels of total protein content and void volume compared to brushite stones. The void volume was highly correlated with the total protein contents in all stones (r2 = 0.61, P < 0.0001), and brushite stones contained significantly fewer void regions and proteins than did apatite stones (3.2 ± 4.5{\%} voids for brushite vs. 10.8 ± 11.2{\%} for apatite, P < 0.005; 4.1 ± 1.6{\%} protein for brushite vs. 6.0 ± 2.4{\%} for apatite, P < 0.03). Morphological observations other than void volume did not correlate with protein content of stones, and neither did the presence or absence of minor mineral components. Our results show that protein content of brushite and apatite stones is higher than that was previously thought, and also suggest that micro CT-visible void regions are related to the presence of protein.",
keywords = "Micro CT, Organic matrix, Urolithiasis, Void volume",
author = "Rocky Pramanik and Asplin, {John R.} and Jackson, {Molly E.} and James Williams",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s00240-008-0151-7",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "251--258",
journal = "Urolithiasis",
issn = "2194-7228",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protein content of human apatite and brushite kidney stones

T2 - Significant correlation with morphologic measures

AU - Pramanik, Rocky

AU - Asplin, John R.

AU - Jackson, Molly E.

AU - Williams, James

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - Apatite and brushite kidney stones share calcium and phosphate as their main inorganic components. We tested the hypothesis that these stone types differ in the amount of proteins present in the stones. Intact stones were intensively analyzed by microcomputed tomography (micro CT) for both morphology (including the volume of voids, i.e., space devoid of X-ray dense material) and mineral type. To extract all proteins present in kidney stones in soluble form we developed a three-step extraction procedure using the ground stone powder. Apatite stones had significantly higher levels of total protein content and void volume compared to brushite stones. The void volume was highly correlated with the total protein contents in all stones (r2 = 0.61, P < 0.0001), and brushite stones contained significantly fewer void regions and proteins than did apatite stones (3.2 ± 4.5% voids for brushite vs. 10.8 ± 11.2% for apatite, P < 0.005; 4.1 ± 1.6% protein for brushite vs. 6.0 ± 2.4% for apatite, P < 0.03). Morphological observations other than void volume did not correlate with protein content of stones, and neither did the presence or absence of minor mineral components. Our results show that protein content of brushite and apatite stones is higher than that was previously thought, and also suggest that micro CT-visible void regions are related to the presence of protein.

AB - Apatite and brushite kidney stones share calcium and phosphate as their main inorganic components. We tested the hypothesis that these stone types differ in the amount of proteins present in the stones. Intact stones were intensively analyzed by microcomputed tomography (micro CT) for both morphology (including the volume of voids, i.e., space devoid of X-ray dense material) and mineral type. To extract all proteins present in kidney stones in soluble form we developed a three-step extraction procedure using the ground stone powder. Apatite stones had significantly higher levels of total protein content and void volume compared to brushite stones. The void volume was highly correlated with the total protein contents in all stones (r2 = 0.61, P < 0.0001), and brushite stones contained significantly fewer void regions and proteins than did apatite stones (3.2 ± 4.5% voids for brushite vs. 10.8 ± 11.2% for apatite, P < 0.005; 4.1 ± 1.6% protein for brushite vs. 6.0 ± 2.4% for apatite, P < 0.03). Morphological observations other than void volume did not correlate with protein content of stones, and neither did the presence or absence of minor mineral components. Our results show that protein content of brushite and apatite stones is higher than that was previously thought, and also suggest that micro CT-visible void regions are related to the presence of protein.

KW - Micro CT

KW - Organic matrix

KW - Urolithiasis

KW - Void volume

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52949128735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52949128735&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00240-008-0151-7

DO - 10.1007/s00240-008-0151-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 18779958

AN - SCOPUS:52949128735

VL - 36

SP - 251

EP - 258

JO - Urolithiasis

JF - Urolithiasis

SN - 2194-7228

IS - 5

ER -