Proteomic evaluation of cell preparation methods in primary hepatocyte cell culture

Frank Witzmann, James W. Clack, Kevin Geiss, Saber Hussain, Martha J. Juhl, Carol M. Rice, Charles Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In vitro liver preparations are being used increasingly to study various aspects of chemical hepatotoxicity and thus have become powerful alternatives to in vivo toxicologic models. Primary hepatocyte culture systems are especially useful in screening cytotoxic and genotoxic compounds and assessing biochemical lesions associated with chemical exposure. We have begun to use this approach in combination with proteomic analysis to construct a molecular "toxicoproteomic" test system for a broad range of relevant and potentially toxic chemicals. Using a highly parallel two-dimensional electrophoretic (2-DE) protein separation system to analyze cells from culture systems, we previously observed significant variations in protein expression that were unrelated to chemical exposure. We hypothesized these artifactual protein alterations were the result of the variations in the culture conditions or cell manipulations, or both. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the expression of hepatocyte proteins cultured on 6-well plates and recovered for analysis either by scraping/pelleting or direct in-well solubilization. Following incubation of 1.2 × 106 hepatocytes in six-well plate, recovery and solubilization of the cells and 2-DE of the solubilized lysates of 100 000 cells, we detected 1388 proteins in the in-well solubilized samples compared to 899 proteins in the washed/scraped/pelleted cell samples, a loss of 35%. Based on protein identification by peptide mass fingerprinting, the subcellular location of nearly all of the proteins whose abundance decreased were cytosolic and those few that increased were either microsomal, mitochondrial, or cytoskeletal proteins. These results emphasize the variation introduced by cell-handling during recovery of hepatocytes from culture plates and may explain at least some of the artifactual differences observed in earlier in vitro experiments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2223-2232
Number of pages10
JournalElectrophoresis
Volume23
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2002

Fingerprint

Primary Cell Culture
Cell culture
Proteomics
Hepatocytes
Proteins
Pelletizing
Recovery
Peptide Mapping
Cytoskeletal Proteins
Poisons
Mitochondrial Proteins
Liver
Screening
Cell Culture Techniques
Peptides

Keywords

  • Cell-scraping
  • Hepatocytes
  • Peptide mass fingerprinting
  • Primary cell culture
  • Proteomics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Proteomic evaluation of cell preparation methods in primary hepatocyte cell culture. / Witzmann, Frank; Clack, James W.; Geiss, Kevin; Hussain, Saber; Juhl, Martha J.; Rice, Carol M.; Wang, Charles.

In: Electrophoresis, Vol. 23, No. 14, 07.2002, p. 2223-2232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Witzmann, Frank ; Clack, James W. ; Geiss, Kevin ; Hussain, Saber ; Juhl, Martha J. ; Rice, Carol M. ; Wang, Charles. / Proteomic evaluation of cell preparation methods in primary hepatocyte cell culture. In: Electrophoresis. 2002 ; Vol. 23, No. 14. pp. 2223-2232.
@article{c0988e38e675461d9ae17c2b7afa058c,
title = "Proteomic evaluation of cell preparation methods in primary hepatocyte cell culture",
abstract = "In vitro liver preparations are being used increasingly to study various aspects of chemical hepatotoxicity and thus have become powerful alternatives to in vivo toxicologic models. Primary hepatocyte culture systems are especially useful in screening cytotoxic and genotoxic compounds and assessing biochemical lesions associated with chemical exposure. We have begun to use this approach in combination with proteomic analysis to construct a molecular {"}toxicoproteomic{"} test system for a broad range of relevant and potentially toxic chemicals. Using a highly parallel two-dimensional electrophoretic (2-DE) protein separation system to analyze cells from culture systems, we previously observed significant variations in protein expression that were unrelated to chemical exposure. We hypothesized these artifactual protein alterations were the result of the variations in the culture conditions or cell manipulations, or both. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the expression of hepatocyte proteins cultured on 6-well plates and recovered for analysis either by scraping/pelleting or direct in-well solubilization. Following incubation of 1.2 × 106 hepatocytes in six-well plate, recovery and solubilization of the cells and 2-DE of the solubilized lysates of 100 000 cells, we detected 1388 proteins in the in-well solubilized samples compared to 899 proteins in the washed/scraped/pelleted cell samples, a loss of 35{\%}. Based on protein identification by peptide mass fingerprinting, the subcellular location of nearly all of the proteins whose abundance decreased were cytosolic and those few that increased were either microsomal, mitochondrial, or cytoskeletal proteins. These results emphasize the variation introduced by cell-handling during recovery of hepatocytes from culture plates and may explain at least some of the artifactual differences observed in earlier in vitro experiments.",
keywords = "Cell-scraping, Hepatocytes, Peptide mass fingerprinting, Primary cell culture, Proteomics",
author = "Frank Witzmann and Clack, {James W.} and Kevin Geiss and Saber Hussain and Juhl, {Martha J.} and Rice, {Carol M.} and Charles Wang",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/1522-2683(200207)23:14<2223::AID-ELPS2223>3.0.CO;2-D",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "2223--2232",
journal = "Electrophoresis",
issn = "0173-0835",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proteomic evaluation of cell preparation methods in primary hepatocyte cell culture

AU - Witzmann, Frank

AU - Clack, James W.

AU - Geiss, Kevin

AU - Hussain, Saber

AU - Juhl, Martha J.

AU - Rice, Carol M.

AU - Wang, Charles

PY - 2002/7

Y1 - 2002/7

N2 - In vitro liver preparations are being used increasingly to study various aspects of chemical hepatotoxicity and thus have become powerful alternatives to in vivo toxicologic models. Primary hepatocyte culture systems are especially useful in screening cytotoxic and genotoxic compounds and assessing biochemical lesions associated with chemical exposure. We have begun to use this approach in combination with proteomic analysis to construct a molecular "toxicoproteomic" test system for a broad range of relevant and potentially toxic chemicals. Using a highly parallel two-dimensional electrophoretic (2-DE) protein separation system to analyze cells from culture systems, we previously observed significant variations in protein expression that were unrelated to chemical exposure. We hypothesized these artifactual protein alterations were the result of the variations in the culture conditions or cell manipulations, or both. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the expression of hepatocyte proteins cultured on 6-well plates and recovered for analysis either by scraping/pelleting or direct in-well solubilization. Following incubation of 1.2 × 106 hepatocytes in six-well plate, recovery and solubilization of the cells and 2-DE of the solubilized lysates of 100 000 cells, we detected 1388 proteins in the in-well solubilized samples compared to 899 proteins in the washed/scraped/pelleted cell samples, a loss of 35%. Based on protein identification by peptide mass fingerprinting, the subcellular location of nearly all of the proteins whose abundance decreased were cytosolic and those few that increased were either microsomal, mitochondrial, or cytoskeletal proteins. These results emphasize the variation introduced by cell-handling during recovery of hepatocytes from culture plates and may explain at least some of the artifactual differences observed in earlier in vitro experiments.

AB - In vitro liver preparations are being used increasingly to study various aspects of chemical hepatotoxicity and thus have become powerful alternatives to in vivo toxicologic models. Primary hepatocyte culture systems are especially useful in screening cytotoxic and genotoxic compounds and assessing biochemical lesions associated with chemical exposure. We have begun to use this approach in combination with proteomic analysis to construct a molecular "toxicoproteomic" test system for a broad range of relevant and potentially toxic chemicals. Using a highly parallel two-dimensional electrophoretic (2-DE) protein separation system to analyze cells from culture systems, we previously observed significant variations in protein expression that were unrelated to chemical exposure. We hypothesized these artifactual protein alterations were the result of the variations in the culture conditions or cell manipulations, or both. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess the expression of hepatocyte proteins cultured on 6-well plates and recovered for analysis either by scraping/pelleting or direct in-well solubilization. Following incubation of 1.2 × 106 hepatocytes in six-well plate, recovery and solubilization of the cells and 2-DE of the solubilized lysates of 100 000 cells, we detected 1388 proteins in the in-well solubilized samples compared to 899 proteins in the washed/scraped/pelleted cell samples, a loss of 35%. Based on protein identification by peptide mass fingerprinting, the subcellular location of nearly all of the proteins whose abundance decreased were cytosolic and those few that increased were either microsomal, mitochondrial, or cytoskeletal proteins. These results emphasize the variation introduced by cell-handling during recovery of hepatocytes from culture plates and may explain at least some of the artifactual differences observed in earlier in vitro experiments.

KW - Cell-scraping

KW - Hepatocytes

KW - Peptide mass fingerprinting

KW - Primary cell culture

KW - Proteomics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036638466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036638466&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/1522-2683(200207)23:14<2223::AID-ELPS2223>3.0.CO;2-D

DO - 10.1002/1522-2683(200207)23:14<2223::AID-ELPS2223>3.0.CO;2-D

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 2223

EP - 2232

JO - Electrophoresis

JF - Electrophoresis

SN - 0173-0835

IS - 14

ER -