Public hospitals in financial distress

Is privatization a strategic choice?

Zo Ramamonjiarivelo, Robert Weech-Maldonado, Larry Hearld, Nir Menachemi, Josué Patien Epané, Stephen O'Connor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: As safety net providers, public hospitals operate in more challenging environments than private hospitals. Such environments put public hospitals at greater risk of financial distress, which may result in privatization and deterioration of the safety net. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether financial distress is associated with privatization among public hospitals. Methodology/Approach: We used panel data merged from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, Medicare Cost Reports, Area Resource File, and Local Area Unemployment Statistics. Our study population consisted of all U.S. nonfederal acute care public hospitals in 1997 tracked through 2009, resulting in 6,426 hospital-year observations. The dependent variable "privatization" was defined as conversion from public status to either private not-for-profit or private for-profit status. The main independent variable, "financial distress," was based on the Altman Z-score methodology. Control variables included market and organizational factors. Two random-effects logistic regression models with state and year fixed-effects were constructed. The independent and control variables were lagged by 1 year and 2 years for Models 1 and 2, respectively. Findings: Public hospitals in financial distress had greater odds of being privatized than public hospitals not in financial distress: (OR = 4.53, p <.001) for Model 1 and (OR = 3.05, p =.001) for Model 2. Practice Implications: Privatization eases access to resources and may provide financial relief to government entities from the burden of continuously funding a hospital operating at a loss, which in turn may help keep the hospital open and preserve access to care for the community. Privatizing a financially distressed public hospital may be a better strategic alternative than closure. The Altman Z-score could be used as a managerial tool to monitor hospitals' financial condition and take corrective actions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-347
Number of pages11
JournalHealth Care Management Review
Volume40
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Privatization
Public Hospitals
Safety-net Providers
Logistic Models
American Hospital Association
Private Hospitals
Unemployment
Medicare
Public hospitals
Financial distress
Strategic choice
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • financial distress
  • privatization
  • property rights theory
  • public hospitals
  • resource dependence theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Ramamonjiarivelo, Z., Weech-Maldonado, R., Hearld, L., Menachemi, N., Epané, J. P., & O'Connor, S. (2015). Public hospitals in financial distress: Is privatization a strategic choice? Health Care Management Review, 40(4), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000032

Public hospitals in financial distress : Is privatization a strategic choice? / Ramamonjiarivelo, Zo; Weech-Maldonado, Robert; Hearld, Larry; Menachemi, Nir; Epané, Josué Patien; O'Connor, Stephen.

In: Health Care Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.01.2015, p. 337-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ramamonjiarivelo, Z, Weech-Maldonado, R, Hearld, L, Menachemi, N, Epané, JP & O'Connor, S 2015, 'Public hospitals in financial distress: Is privatization a strategic choice?', Health Care Management Review, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000032
Ramamonjiarivelo, Zo ; Weech-Maldonado, Robert ; Hearld, Larry ; Menachemi, Nir ; Epané, Josué Patien ; O'Connor, Stephen. / Public hospitals in financial distress : Is privatization a strategic choice?. In: Health Care Management Review. 2015 ; Vol. 40, No. 4. pp. 337-347.
@article{2ab8ab0b6d124e32bca7a884decb4f42,
title = "Public hospitals in financial distress: Is privatization a strategic choice?",
abstract = "Background: As safety net providers, public hospitals operate in more challenging environments than private hospitals. Such environments put public hospitals at greater risk of financial distress, which may result in privatization and deterioration of the safety net. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether financial distress is associated with privatization among public hospitals. Methodology/Approach: We used panel data merged from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, Medicare Cost Reports, Area Resource File, and Local Area Unemployment Statistics. Our study population consisted of all U.S. nonfederal acute care public hospitals in 1997 tracked through 2009, resulting in 6,426 hospital-year observations. The dependent variable {"}privatization{"} was defined as conversion from public status to either private not-for-profit or private for-profit status. The main independent variable, {"}financial distress,{"} was based on the Altman Z-score methodology. Control variables included market and organizational factors. Two random-effects logistic regression models with state and year fixed-effects were constructed. The independent and control variables were lagged by 1 year and 2 years for Models 1 and 2, respectively. Findings: Public hospitals in financial distress had greater odds of being privatized than public hospitals not in financial distress: (OR = 4.53, p <.001) for Model 1 and (OR = 3.05, p =.001) for Model 2. Practice Implications: Privatization eases access to resources and may provide financial relief to government entities from the burden of continuously funding a hospital operating at a loss, which in turn may help keep the hospital open and preserve access to care for the community. Privatizing a financially distressed public hospital may be a better strategic alternative than closure. The Altman Z-score could be used as a managerial tool to monitor hospitals' financial condition and take corrective actions.",
keywords = "financial distress, privatization, property rights theory, public hospitals, resource dependence theory",
author = "Zo Ramamonjiarivelo and Robert Weech-Maldonado and Larry Hearld and Nir Menachemi and Epan{\'e}, {Josu{\'e} Patien} and Stephen O'Connor",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/HMR.0000000000000032",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "337--347",
journal = "Health Care Management Review",
issn = "0361-6274",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public hospitals in financial distress

T2 - Is privatization a strategic choice?

AU - Ramamonjiarivelo, Zo

AU - Weech-Maldonado, Robert

AU - Hearld, Larry

AU - Menachemi, Nir

AU - Epané, Josué Patien

AU - O'Connor, Stephen

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: As safety net providers, public hospitals operate in more challenging environments than private hospitals. Such environments put public hospitals at greater risk of financial distress, which may result in privatization and deterioration of the safety net. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether financial distress is associated with privatization among public hospitals. Methodology/Approach: We used panel data merged from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, Medicare Cost Reports, Area Resource File, and Local Area Unemployment Statistics. Our study population consisted of all U.S. nonfederal acute care public hospitals in 1997 tracked through 2009, resulting in 6,426 hospital-year observations. The dependent variable "privatization" was defined as conversion from public status to either private not-for-profit or private for-profit status. The main independent variable, "financial distress," was based on the Altman Z-score methodology. Control variables included market and organizational factors. Two random-effects logistic regression models with state and year fixed-effects were constructed. The independent and control variables were lagged by 1 year and 2 years for Models 1 and 2, respectively. Findings: Public hospitals in financial distress had greater odds of being privatized than public hospitals not in financial distress: (OR = 4.53, p <.001) for Model 1 and (OR = 3.05, p =.001) for Model 2. Practice Implications: Privatization eases access to resources and may provide financial relief to government entities from the burden of continuously funding a hospital operating at a loss, which in turn may help keep the hospital open and preserve access to care for the community. Privatizing a financially distressed public hospital may be a better strategic alternative than closure. The Altman Z-score could be used as a managerial tool to monitor hospitals' financial condition and take corrective actions.

AB - Background: As safety net providers, public hospitals operate in more challenging environments than private hospitals. Such environments put public hospitals at greater risk of financial distress, which may result in privatization and deterioration of the safety net. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether financial distress is associated with privatization among public hospitals. Methodology/Approach: We used panel data merged from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, Medicare Cost Reports, Area Resource File, and Local Area Unemployment Statistics. Our study population consisted of all U.S. nonfederal acute care public hospitals in 1997 tracked through 2009, resulting in 6,426 hospital-year observations. The dependent variable "privatization" was defined as conversion from public status to either private not-for-profit or private for-profit status. The main independent variable, "financial distress," was based on the Altman Z-score methodology. Control variables included market and organizational factors. Two random-effects logistic regression models with state and year fixed-effects were constructed. The independent and control variables were lagged by 1 year and 2 years for Models 1 and 2, respectively. Findings: Public hospitals in financial distress had greater odds of being privatized than public hospitals not in financial distress: (OR = 4.53, p <.001) for Model 1 and (OR = 3.05, p =.001) for Model 2. Practice Implications: Privatization eases access to resources and may provide financial relief to government entities from the burden of continuously funding a hospital operating at a loss, which in turn may help keep the hospital open and preserve access to care for the community. Privatizing a financially distressed public hospital may be a better strategic alternative than closure. The Altman Z-score could be used as a managerial tool to monitor hospitals' financial condition and take corrective actions.

KW - financial distress

KW - privatization

KW - property rights theory

KW - public hospitals

KW - resource dependence theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942195621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942195621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000032

DO - 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000032

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 337

EP - 347

JO - Health Care Management Review

JF - Health Care Management Review

SN - 0361-6274

IS - 4

ER -