Quality improvement and accreditation: What might it look like?

Kaye Bender, Paul Halverson

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Following the 2006 release of the Exploring Accreditation Project report on the desirability and feasibility of establishing a national voluntary public health accreditation program, the Public Health Accreditation Board was established. Since that time, standards, measures, and an assessment process have been developed. Beta testing of the full accreditation cycle is underway. The Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation program relies heavily on quality improvement as its cornerstone. In this commentary, we describe how accreditation and quality improvement can operate together synergistically to strengthen public health practice and improve outcomes at the community level.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-82
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Accreditation
Quality Improvement
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Public Health
Public Health Practice

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Accreditation
  • Exploring Accreditation Project
  • Performance improvement
  • Public health
  • Public health accreditation
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Quality improvement and accreditation : What might it look like? / Bender, Kaye; Halverson, Paul.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 79-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

@article{afd3df5b6e184dae940daea12e8daebb,
title = "Quality improvement and accreditation: What might it look like?",
abstract = "Following the 2006 release of the Exploring Accreditation Project report on the desirability and feasibility of establishing a national voluntary public health accreditation program, the Public Health Accreditation Board was established. Since that time, standards, measures, and an assessment process have been developed. Beta testing of the full accreditation cycle is underway. The Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation program relies heavily on quality improvement as its cornerstone. In this commentary, we describe how accreditation and quality improvement can operate together synergistically to strengthen public health practice and improve outcomes at the community level.",
keywords = "Accountability, Accreditation, Exploring Accreditation Project, Performance improvement, Public health, Public health accreditation, Quality improvement",
author = "Kaye Bender and Paul Halverson",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181c2c7b8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "79--82",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality improvement and accreditation

T2 - What might it look like?

AU - Bender, Kaye

AU - Halverson, Paul

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Following the 2006 release of the Exploring Accreditation Project report on the desirability and feasibility of establishing a national voluntary public health accreditation program, the Public Health Accreditation Board was established. Since that time, standards, measures, and an assessment process have been developed. Beta testing of the full accreditation cycle is underway. The Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation program relies heavily on quality improvement as its cornerstone. In this commentary, we describe how accreditation and quality improvement can operate together synergistically to strengthen public health practice and improve outcomes at the community level.

AB - Following the 2006 release of the Exploring Accreditation Project report on the desirability and feasibility of establishing a national voluntary public health accreditation program, the Public Health Accreditation Board was established. Since that time, standards, measures, and an assessment process have been developed. Beta testing of the full accreditation cycle is underway. The Public Health Accreditation Board accreditation program relies heavily on quality improvement as its cornerstone. In this commentary, we describe how accreditation and quality improvement can operate together synergistically to strengthen public health practice and improve outcomes at the community level.

KW - Accountability

KW - Accreditation

KW - Exploring Accreditation Project

KW - Performance improvement

KW - Public health

KW - Public health accreditation

KW - Quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74349119342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74349119342&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181c2c7b8

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181c2c7b8

M3 - Short survey

C2 - 20009649

AN - SCOPUS:74349119342

VL - 16

SP - 79

EP - 82

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 1

ER -