Quality in colonoscopy: Cecal intubation first, then what?

Douglas K. Rex

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2002, the U.S. MultiSociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer proposed multiple quality indicators for use in the continuous quality improvement (CQI) process for colonoscopy. The quality indicators were not prioritized for implementation in clinical practice. This editorial reviews evidence suggesting that after cecal intubation rates, two quality indicators should be the priorities for the CQI process for colonoscopy: (1) measurement of individual endoscopists' adenoma detection rates and (2) recommended intervals for postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)732-734
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume101
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Quality in colonoscopy: Cecal intubation first, then what?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this