Quality of life after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy

Long-term evaluation in patients with chronic pancreatitis

Thomas Howard, John B. Swofford, Dennis L. Wagner, Stuart Sherman, Glen Lehman, C. F. Frey, J. Disario, N. J. Soper, L. W. Traverso, L. W. Way, David W. Rattner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We prospectively evaluated quality of life and visual analogue scale pain scores after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy in 55 patients with small-duct chronic pancreatitis and abdominal pain. The perioperative morbidity rate was 11% and there were no perioperative deaths. Four late deaths occurred (7%), and three patients were lost to follow-up. Patients were divided into those who had prior operative or endoscopic interventions (N = 38) and those who did not (N = 17). Preoperatively there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, etiology, pain score, or narcotic use. Pain score, narcotic use, and symptoms scales improved significantly in both groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The group with no prior surgical or endoscopic intervention did significantly better initially (P < 0.007), and the improvements in their quality-of-life and pain scores continued for the remainder of the study. In contrast, quality-of-life and pain scores in patients who had undergone prior surgical or endoscopic intervention returned to baseline by 12 months postoperatively and remained poor throughout the remainder of the study. Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy appears to work best in patients who have had no prior operative or endoscopic interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)845-854
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Chronic Pancreatitis
Quality of Life
Pain
Narcotics
Lost to Follow-Up
Pain Measurement
Chronic Pain
Abdominal Pain
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Chronic abdominal pain
  • Chronic pancreatitis
  • Thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Quality of life after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy : Long-term evaluation in patients with chronic pancreatitis. / Howard, Thomas; Swofford, John B.; Wagner, Dennis L.; Sherman, Stuart; Lehman, Glen; Frey, C. F.; Disario, J.; Soper, N. J.; Traverso, L. W.; Way, L. W.; Rattner, David W.

In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 6, No. 6, 2002, p. 845-854.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Howard, Thomas ; Swofford, John B. ; Wagner, Dennis L. ; Sherman, Stuart ; Lehman, Glen ; Frey, C. F. ; Disario, J. ; Soper, N. J. ; Traverso, L. W. ; Way, L. W. ; Rattner, David W. / Quality of life after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy : Long-term evaluation in patients with chronic pancreatitis. In: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2002 ; Vol. 6, No. 6. pp. 845-854.
@article{fcd965afb1dd45df8f7d4c433db28afa,
title = "Quality of life after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy: Long-term evaluation in patients with chronic pancreatitis",
abstract = "We prospectively evaluated quality of life and visual analogue scale pain scores after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy in 55 patients with small-duct chronic pancreatitis and abdominal pain. The perioperative morbidity rate was 11{\%} and there were no perioperative deaths. Four late deaths occurred (7{\%}), and three patients were lost to follow-up. Patients were divided into those who had prior operative or endoscopic interventions (N = 38) and those who did not (N = 17). Preoperatively there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, etiology, pain score, or narcotic use. Pain score, narcotic use, and symptoms scales improved significantly in both groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The group with no prior surgical or endoscopic intervention did significantly better initially (P < 0.007), and the improvements in their quality-of-life and pain scores continued for the remainder of the study. In contrast, quality-of-life and pain scores in patients who had undergone prior surgical or endoscopic intervention returned to baseline by 12 months postoperatively and remained poor throughout the remainder of the study. Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy appears to work best in patients who have had no prior operative or endoscopic interventions.",
keywords = "Chronic abdominal pain, Chronic pancreatitis, Thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy",
author = "Thomas Howard and Swofford, {John B.} and Wagner, {Dennis L.} and Stuart Sherman and Glen Lehman and Frey, {C. F.} and J. Disario and Soper, {N. J.} and Traverso, {L. W.} and Way, {L. W.} and Rattner, {David W.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00123-3",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "845--854",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of life after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy

T2 - Long-term evaluation in patients with chronic pancreatitis

AU - Howard, Thomas

AU - Swofford, John B.

AU - Wagner, Dennis L.

AU - Sherman, Stuart

AU - Lehman, Glen

AU - Frey, C. F.

AU - Disario, J.

AU - Soper, N. J.

AU - Traverso, L. W.

AU - Way, L. W.

AU - Rattner, David W.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - We prospectively evaluated quality of life and visual analogue scale pain scores after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy in 55 patients with small-duct chronic pancreatitis and abdominal pain. The perioperative morbidity rate was 11% and there were no perioperative deaths. Four late deaths occurred (7%), and three patients were lost to follow-up. Patients were divided into those who had prior operative or endoscopic interventions (N = 38) and those who did not (N = 17). Preoperatively there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, etiology, pain score, or narcotic use. Pain score, narcotic use, and symptoms scales improved significantly in both groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The group with no prior surgical or endoscopic intervention did significantly better initially (P < 0.007), and the improvements in their quality-of-life and pain scores continued for the remainder of the study. In contrast, quality-of-life and pain scores in patients who had undergone prior surgical or endoscopic intervention returned to baseline by 12 months postoperatively and remained poor throughout the remainder of the study. Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy appears to work best in patients who have had no prior operative or endoscopic interventions.

AB - We prospectively evaluated quality of life and visual analogue scale pain scores after bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy in 55 patients with small-duct chronic pancreatitis and abdominal pain. The perioperative morbidity rate was 11% and there were no perioperative deaths. Four late deaths occurred (7%), and three patients were lost to follow-up. Patients were divided into those who had prior operative or endoscopic interventions (N = 38) and those who did not (N = 17). Preoperatively there were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, etiology, pain score, or narcotic use. Pain score, narcotic use, and symptoms scales improved significantly in both groups at 3 and 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.0001). The group with no prior surgical or endoscopic intervention did significantly better initially (P < 0.007), and the improvements in their quality-of-life and pain scores continued for the remainder of the study. In contrast, quality-of-life and pain scores in patients who had undergone prior surgical or endoscopic intervention returned to baseline by 12 months postoperatively and remained poor throughout the remainder of the study. Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy appears to work best in patients who have had no prior operative or endoscopic interventions.

KW - Chronic abdominal pain

KW - Chronic pancreatitis

KW - Thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19044365925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19044365925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00123-3

DO - 10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00123-3

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 845

EP - 854

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 6

ER -