Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida for Children (QUALAS-C): Development and Validation of a Novel Health-related Quality of Life Instrument

Konrad Szymanski, Rosalia Misseri, Benjamin Whittam, David Y. Yang, Sonia Maria Raposo, Shelly J. King, Martin Kaefer, Richard C. Rink, Mark P. Cain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To develop and validate a self-reported health-related QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Children (QUALAS-C). Methods We drafted a 27-question pilot instrument using a patient-centered comprehensive item generation and refinement process. It was administered to a sample of children 8-12 years old with spina bifida (SB) recruited online via social media and in person at an outpatient SB clinic (January 2013-September 2014). Healthy controls were recruited at routine pediatrician visits. Validation and final questions were determined based on clinical relevance, high loadings on factor analysis, and domain psychometrics. Children with SB also completed the validated generic Kidscreen-27 instrument. Results Median age of 150 participants was 9.6 years (60.7% male, 72.7% Caucasian), similar to 46 controls (P ≥.10). There were 97 online and 53 clinic participants (89.0% and 84.2% of eligible, respectively). Face and content validities of the 2-domain, 10-question QUALAS-C were established by patients, parents, and experts. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was high for the Esteem & Independence and Bladder & Bowel domains (Cronbach's alpha: 0.72-0.76, ICC: 0.74-0.77). Correlations between QUALAS-C domains were low (r = 0.51), indicating that QUALAS-C can differentiate between two distinct health-related quality of life components. Correlations between QUALAS-C and Kidscreen-27 were also low (r ≤ 0.44). QUALAS-C scores were significantly lower in children with SB than without (P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-184
Number of pages7
JournalUrology
Volume87
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Spinal Dysraphism
Child Development
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Social Media
Psychometrics
Statistical Factor Analysis
Urinary Bladder
Outpatients
Parents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida for Children (QUALAS-C) : Development and Validation of a Novel Health-related Quality of Life Instrument. / Szymanski, Konrad; Misseri, Rosalia; Whittam, Benjamin; Yang, David Y.; Raposo, Sonia Maria; King, Shelly J.; Kaefer, Martin; Rink, Richard C.; Cain, Mark P.

In: Urology, Vol. 87, 01.01.2016, p. 178-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Szymanski, Konrad ; Misseri, Rosalia ; Whittam, Benjamin ; Yang, David Y. ; Raposo, Sonia Maria ; King, Shelly J. ; Kaefer, Martin ; Rink, Richard C. ; Cain, Mark P. / Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida for Children (QUALAS-C) : Development and Validation of a Novel Health-related Quality of Life Instrument. In: Urology. 2016 ; Vol. 87. pp. 178-184.
@article{2a6fbbabd7c3453fa0f112f01c709d4e,
title = "Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida for Children (QUALAS-C): Development and Validation of a Novel Health-related Quality of Life Instrument",
abstract = "Objective To develop and validate a self-reported health-related QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Children (QUALAS-C). Methods We drafted a 27-question pilot instrument using a patient-centered comprehensive item generation and refinement process. It was administered to a sample of children 8-12 years old with spina bifida (SB) recruited online via social media and in person at an outpatient SB clinic (January 2013-September 2014). Healthy controls were recruited at routine pediatrician visits. Validation and final questions were determined based on clinical relevance, high loadings on factor analysis, and domain psychometrics. Children with SB also completed the validated generic Kidscreen-27 instrument. Results Median age of 150 participants was 9.6 years (60.7{\%} male, 72.7{\%} Caucasian), similar to 46 controls (P ≥.10). There were 97 online and 53 clinic participants (89.0{\%} and 84.2{\%} of eligible, respectively). Face and content validities of the 2-domain, 10-question QUALAS-C were established by patients, parents, and experts. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was high for the Esteem & Independence and Bladder & Bowel domains (Cronbach's alpha: 0.72-0.76, ICC: 0.74-0.77). Correlations between QUALAS-C domains were low (r = 0.51), indicating that QUALAS-C can differentiate between two distinct health-related quality of life components. Correlations between QUALAS-C and Kidscreen-27 were also low (r ≤ 0.44). QUALAS-C scores were significantly lower in children with SB than without (P",
author = "Konrad Szymanski and Rosalia Misseri and Benjamin Whittam and Yang, {David Y.} and Raposo, {Sonia Maria} and King, {Shelly J.} and Martin Kaefer and Rink, {Richard C.} and Cain, {Mark P.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "178--184",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida for Children (QUALAS-C)

T2 - Development and Validation of a Novel Health-related Quality of Life Instrument

AU - Szymanski, Konrad

AU - Misseri, Rosalia

AU - Whittam, Benjamin

AU - Yang, David Y.

AU - Raposo, Sonia Maria

AU - King, Shelly J.

AU - Kaefer, Martin

AU - Rink, Richard C.

AU - Cain, Mark P.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objective To develop and validate a self-reported health-related QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Children (QUALAS-C). Methods We drafted a 27-question pilot instrument using a patient-centered comprehensive item generation and refinement process. It was administered to a sample of children 8-12 years old with spina bifida (SB) recruited online via social media and in person at an outpatient SB clinic (January 2013-September 2014). Healthy controls were recruited at routine pediatrician visits. Validation and final questions were determined based on clinical relevance, high loadings on factor analysis, and domain psychometrics. Children with SB also completed the validated generic Kidscreen-27 instrument. Results Median age of 150 participants was 9.6 years (60.7% male, 72.7% Caucasian), similar to 46 controls (P ≥.10). There were 97 online and 53 clinic participants (89.0% and 84.2% of eligible, respectively). Face and content validities of the 2-domain, 10-question QUALAS-C were established by patients, parents, and experts. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was high for the Esteem & Independence and Bladder & Bowel domains (Cronbach's alpha: 0.72-0.76, ICC: 0.74-0.77). Correlations between QUALAS-C domains were low (r = 0.51), indicating that QUALAS-C can differentiate between two distinct health-related quality of life components. Correlations between QUALAS-C and Kidscreen-27 were also low (r ≤ 0.44). QUALAS-C scores were significantly lower in children with SB than without (P

AB - Objective To develop and validate a self-reported health-related QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Children (QUALAS-C). Methods We drafted a 27-question pilot instrument using a patient-centered comprehensive item generation and refinement process. It was administered to a sample of children 8-12 years old with spina bifida (SB) recruited online via social media and in person at an outpatient SB clinic (January 2013-September 2014). Healthy controls were recruited at routine pediatrician visits. Validation and final questions were determined based on clinical relevance, high loadings on factor analysis, and domain psychometrics. Children with SB also completed the validated generic Kidscreen-27 instrument. Results Median age of 150 participants was 9.6 years (60.7% male, 72.7% Caucasian), similar to 46 controls (P ≥.10). There were 97 online and 53 clinic participants (89.0% and 84.2% of eligible, respectively). Face and content validities of the 2-domain, 10-question QUALAS-C were established by patients, parents, and experts. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was high for the Esteem & Independence and Bladder & Bowel domains (Cronbach's alpha: 0.72-0.76, ICC: 0.74-0.77). Correlations between QUALAS-C domains were low (r = 0.51), indicating that QUALAS-C can differentiate between two distinct health-related quality of life components. Correlations between QUALAS-C and Kidscreen-27 were also low (r ≤ 0.44). QUALAS-C scores were significantly lower in children with SB than without (P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959497261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959497261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.027

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.027

M3 - Article

C2 - 26456744

AN - SCOPUS:84959497261

VL - 87

SP - 178

EP - 184

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

ER -