Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)

Barbara A. Smith, Hyeon Joo Lee, Ju Hee Lee, Mona Choi, Deborah E. Jones, R. Barker Bausell, Marion E. Broome

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the era of evidence-based practice (EBP), Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) may provide the best evidence of the efficacy of nursing interventions and yet the quality of RCT reporting in nursing literature has not been evaluated. The purposes of this study were to apply the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement to published reports of nursing science, examine how adequately the published reports adhere to the statement, and examine the effect of the adoption of CONSORT on the quality of the RCT published reports. One hundred RCTs from 2002-2005 were identified from 4 nursing journals. Articles were randomly assigned to 4 reviewers and the quality of the published reports was evaluated using a modified CONSORT checklist. There was no difference between the 4 journals in the quality of the published reports of RCTs based on the modified CONSORT checklist employed (F = 1.27, P =.29). The quality of reporting of RCTs improved significantly in the only journal, Nursing Research, to adopt the CONSORT statement during the study period (t =-2.70, P =.01). Adoption of CONSORT is recommended as it may lead to an overall improvement in quality of reporting of RCTs in nursing journals. The profession may also wish to explore the use or development of standards similar to CONSORT but ones more appropriate for the types of research typical of that published by nurse scientists.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNursing Outlook
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nursing
Randomized Controlled Trials
Checklist
Nursing Research
Evidence-Based Practice
Quality Improvement
Nurses
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature : Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). / Smith, Barbara A.; Lee, Hyeon Joo; Lee, Ju Hee; Choi, Mona; Jones, Deborah E.; Bausell, R. Barker; Broome, Marion E.

In: Nursing Outlook, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Barbara A. ; Lee, Hyeon Joo ; Lee, Ju Hee ; Choi, Mona ; Jones, Deborah E. ; Bausell, R. Barker ; Broome, Marion E. / Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature : Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). In: Nursing Outlook. 2008 ; Vol. 56, No. 1.
@article{e4b3ce2befe14ed6b6527421ac7e9a59,
title = "Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)",
abstract = "In the era of evidence-based practice (EBP), Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) may provide the best evidence of the efficacy of nursing interventions and yet the quality of RCT reporting in nursing literature has not been evaluated. The purposes of this study were to apply the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement to published reports of nursing science, examine how adequately the published reports adhere to the statement, and examine the effect of the adoption of CONSORT on the quality of the RCT published reports. One hundred RCTs from 2002-2005 were identified from 4 nursing journals. Articles were randomly assigned to 4 reviewers and the quality of the published reports was evaluated using a modified CONSORT checklist. There was no difference between the 4 journals in the quality of the published reports of RCTs based on the modified CONSORT checklist employed (F = 1.27, P =.29). The quality of reporting of RCTs improved significantly in the only journal, Nursing Research, to adopt the CONSORT statement during the study period (t =-2.70, P =.01). Adoption of CONSORT is recommended as it may lead to an overall improvement in quality of reporting of RCTs in nursing journals. The profession may also wish to explore the use or development of standards similar to CONSORT but ones more appropriate for the types of research typical of that published by nurse scientists.",
author = "Smith, {Barbara A.} and Lee, {Hyeon Joo} and Lee, {Ju Hee} and Mona Choi and Jones, {Deborah E.} and Bausell, {R. Barker} and Broome, {Marion E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.002",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
journal = "Nursing Outlook",
issn = "0029-6554",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature

T2 - Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)

AU - Smith, Barbara A.

AU - Lee, Hyeon Joo

AU - Lee, Ju Hee

AU - Choi, Mona

AU - Jones, Deborah E.

AU - Bausell, R. Barker

AU - Broome, Marion E.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - In the era of evidence-based practice (EBP), Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) may provide the best evidence of the efficacy of nursing interventions and yet the quality of RCT reporting in nursing literature has not been evaluated. The purposes of this study were to apply the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement to published reports of nursing science, examine how adequately the published reports adhere to the statement, and examine the effect of the adoption of CONSORT on the quality of the RCT published reports. One hundred RCTs from 2002-2005 were identified from 4 nursing journals. Articles were randomly assigned to 4 reviewers and the quality of the published reports was evaluated using a modified CONSORT checklist. There was no difference between the 4 journals in the quality of the published reports of RCTs based on the modified CONSORT checklist employed (F = 1.27, P =.29). The quality of reporting of RCTs improved significantly in the only journal, Nursing Research, to adopt the CONSORT statement during the study period (t =-2.70, P =.01). Adoption of CONSORT is recommended as it may lead to an overall improvement in quality of reporting of RCTs in nursing journals. The profession may also wish to explore the use or development of standards similar to CONSORT but ones more appropriate for the types of research typical of that published by nurse scientists.

AB - In the era of evidence-based practice (EBP), Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) may provide the best evidence of the efficacy of nursing interventions and yet the quality of RCT reporting in nursing literature has not been evaluated. The purposes of this study were to apply the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement to published reports of nursing science, examine how adequately the published reports adhere to the statement, and examine the effect of the adoption of CONSORT on the quality of the RCT published reports. One hundred RCTs from 2002-2005 were identified from 4 nursing journals. Articles were randomly assigned to 4 reviewers and the quality of the published reports was evaluated using a modified CONSORT checklist. There was no difference between the 4 journals in the quality of the published reports of RCTs based on the modified CONSORT checklist employed (F = 1.27, P =.29). The quality of reporting of RCTs improved significantly in the only journal, Nursing Research, to adopt the CONSORT statement during the study period (t =-2.70, P =.01). Adoption of CONSORT is recommended as it may lead to an overall improvement in quality of reporting of RCTs in nursing journals. The profession may also wish to explore the use or development of standards similar to CONSORT but ones more appropriate for the types of research typical of that published by nurse scientists.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38349101308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38349101308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.002

DO - 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 18237622

AN - SCOPUS:38349101308

VL - 56

JO - Nursing Outlook

JF - Nursing Outlook

SN - 0029-6554

IS - 1

ER -