Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones

Jessica C. Dai, Mathew D. Sorensen, Helena C. Chang, Patrick C. Samson, Barbrina Dunmire, Bryan W. Cunitz, Jeff Thiel, Ziyue Liu, Michael R. Bailey, Jonathan D. Harper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigative modality to noninvasively image and reposition urinary stones. Our goals were to test safety and effectiveness of new acoustic exposure conditions from a new transducer, and to use simultaneous ureteroscopic and ultrasonic observation to quantify stone repositioning. Materials and Methods: During operation, ultrasonic propulsion was applied transcutaneously, whereas stone targets were visualized ureteroscopically. Exposures were 350 kHz frequency, ≤200 W/cm2 focal intensity, and ≤3-second bursts per push. Ureteroscope and ultrasound (US) videos were recorded. Video clips with and without stone motion were randomized and scored for motion ≥3 mm by independent reviewers blinded to the exposures. Subjects were followed with telephone calls, imaging, and chart review for adverse events. Results: The investigative treatment was used in 18 subjects and 19 kidneys. A total of 62 stone targets were treated ranging in size from a collection of "dust" to 15 mm. Subjects received an average of 17 ± 14 propulsion bursts (per kidney) for a total average exposure time of 40 ± 40 seconds. Independent reviewers scored at least one stone movement ≥3 mm in 18 of 19 kidneys (95%) from the ureteroscope videos and in 15 of 19 kidneys (79%) from the US videos. This difference was probably because of motion out of the US imaging plane. Treatment repositioned stones in two cases that would have otherwise required basket repositioning. No serious adverse events were observed with the device or procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasonic propulsion was shown to be safe, and it effectively repositioned stones in 95%of kidneys despite positioning and access restrictions caused by working in an operating room on anesthetized subjects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)850-857
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume33
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Kidney Calculi
Ultrasonics
Kidney
Ureteroscopes
Urinary Calculi
Operating Rooms
Transducers
Dust
Surgical Instruments
Telephone
Acoustics
Ultrasonography
Observation
Safety
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • lithotripsy
  • ureteroscopy
  • urinary stones
  • urolithiasis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Dai, J. C., Sorensen, M. D., Chang, H. C., Samson, P. C., Dunmire, B., Cunitz, B. W., ... Harper, J. D. (2019). Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones. Journal of Endourology, 33(10), 850-857. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0340

Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones. / Dai, Jessica C.; Sorensen, Mathew D.; Chang, Helena C.; Samson, Patrick C.; Dunmire, Barbrina; Cunitz, Bryan W.; Thiel, Jeff; Liu, Ziyue; Bailey, Michael R.; Harper, Jonathan D.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 33, No. 10, 10.2019, p. 850-857.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dai, JC, Sorensen, MD, Chang, HC, Samson, PC, Dunmire, B, Cunitz, BW, Thiel, J, Liu, Z, Bailey, MR & Harper, JD 2019, 'Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones', Journal of Endourology, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 850-857. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0340
Dai JC, Sorensen MD, Chang HC, Samson PC, Dunmire B, Cunitz BW et al. Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones. Journal of Endourology. 2019 Oct;33(10):850-857. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0340
Dai, Jessica C. ; Sorensen, Mathew D. ; Chang, Helena C. ; Samson, Patrick C. ; Dunmire, Barbrina ; Cunitz, Bryan W. ; Thiel, Jeff ; Liu, Ziyue ; Bailey, Michael R. ; Harper, Jonathan D. / Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones. In: Journal of Endourology. 2019 ; Vol. 33, No. 10. pp. 850-857.
@article{9c4f0e78843642aaa0ad163d81ccb61e,
title = "Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones",
abstract = "Purpose: Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigative modality to noninvasively image and reposition urinary stones. Our goals were to test safety and effectiveness of new acoustic exposure conditions from a new transducer, and to use simultaneous ureteroscopic and ultrasonic observation to quantify stone repositioning. Materials and Methods: During operation, ultrasonic propulsion was applied transcutaneously, whereas stone targets were visualized ureteroscopically. Exposures were 350 kHz frequency, ≤200 W/cm2 focal intensity, and ≤3-second bursts per push. Ureteroscope and ultrasound (US) videos were recorded. Video clips with and without stone motion were randomized and scored for motion ≥3 mm by independent reviewers blinded to the exposures. Subjects were followed with telephone calls, imaging, and chart review for adverse events. Results: The investigative treatment was used in 18 subjects and 19 kidneys. A total of 62 stone targets were treated ranging in size from a collection of {"}dust{"} to 15 mm. Subjects received an average of 17 ± 14 propulsion bursts (per kidney) for a total average exposure time of 40 ± 40 seconds. Independent reviewers scored at least one stone movement ≥3 mm in 18 of 19 kidneys (95{\%}) from the ureteroscope videos and in 15 of 19 kidneys (79{\%}) from the US videos. This difference was probably because of motion out of the US imaging plane. Treatment repositioned stones in two cases that would have otherwise required basket repositioning. No serious adverse events were observed with the device or procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasonic propulsion was shown to be safe, and it effectively repositioned stones in 95{\%}of kidneys despite positioning and access restrictions caused by working in an operating room on anesthetized subjects.",
keywords = "lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, urinary stones, urolithiasis",
author = "Dai, {Jessica C.} and Sorensen, {Mathew D.} and Chang, {Helena C.} and Samson, {Patrick C.} and Barbrina Dunmire and Cunitz, {Bryan W.} and Jeff Thiel and Ziyue Liu and Bailey, {Michael R.} and Harper, {Jonathan D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1089/end.2019.0340",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "850--857",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative Assessment of Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Propulsion of Kidney Stones

AU - Dai, Jessica C.

AU - Sorensen, Mathew D.

AU - Chang, Helena C.

AU - Samson, Patrick C.

AU - Dunmire, Barbrina

AU - Cunitz, Bryan W.

AU - Thiel, Jeff

AU - Liu, Ziyue

AU - Bailey, Michael R.

AU - Harper, Jonathan D.

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Purpose: Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigative modality to noninvasively image and reposition urinary stones. Our goals were to test safety and effectiveness of new acoustic exposure conditions from a new transducer, and to use simultaneous ureteroscopic and ultrasonic observation to quantify stone repositioning. Materials and Methods: During operation, ultrasonic propulsion was applied transcutaneously, whereas stone targets were visualized ureteroscopically. Exposures were 350 kHz frequency, ≤200 W/cm2 focal intensity, and ≤3-second bursts per push. Ureteroscope and ultrasound (US) videos were recorded. Video clips with and without stone motion were randomized and scored for motion ≥3 mm by independent reviewers blinded to the exposures. Subjects were followed with telephone calls, imaging, and chart review for adverse events. Results: The investigative treatment was used in 18 subjects and 19 kidneys. A total of 62 stone targets were treated ranging in size from a collection of "dust" to 15 mm. Subjects received an average of 17 ± 14 propulsion bursts (per kidney) for a total average exposure time of 40 ± 40 seconds. Independent reviewers scored at least one stone movement ≥3 mm in 18 of 19 kidneys (95%) from the ureteroscope videos and in 15 of 19 kidneys (79%) from the US videos. This difference was probably because of motion out of the US imaging plane. Treatment repositioned stones in two cases that would have otherwise required basket repositioning. No serious adverse events were observed with the device or procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasonic propulsion was shown to be safe, and it effectively repositioned stones in 95%of kidneys despite positioning and access restrictions caused by working in an operating room on anesthetized subjects.

AB - Purpose: Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigative modality to noninvasively image and reposition urinary stones. Our goals were to test safety and effectiveness of new acoustic exposure conditions from a new transducer, and to use simultaneous ureteroscopic and ultrasonic observation to quantify stone repositioning. Materials and Methods: During operation, ultrasonic propulsion was applied transcutaneously, whereas stone targets were visualized ureteroscopically. Exposures were 350 kHz frequency, ≤200 W/cm2 focal intensity, and ≤3-second bursts per push. Ureteroscope and ultrasound (US) videos were recorded. Video clips with and without stone motion were randomized and scored for motion ≥3 mm by independent reviewers blinded to the exposures. Subjects were followed with telephone calls, imaging, and chart review for adverse events. Results: The investigative treatment was used in 18 subjects and 19 kidneys. A total of 62 stone targets were treated ranging in size from a collection of "dust" to 15 mm. Subjects received an average of 17 ± 14 propulsion bursts (per kidney) for a total average exposure time of 40 ± 40 seconds. Independent reviewers scored at least one stone movement ≥3 mm in 18 of 19 kidneys (95%) from the ureteroscope videos and in 15 of 19 kidneys (79%) from the US videos. This difference was probably because of motion out of the US imaging plane. Treatment repositioned stones in two cases that would have otherwise required basket repositioning. No serious adverse events were observed with the device or procedure. Conclusions: Ultrasonic propulsion was shown to be safe, and it effectively repositioned stones in 95%of kidneys despite positioning and access restrictions caused by working in an operating room on anesthetized subjects.

KW - lithotripsy

KW - ureteroscopy

KW - urinary stones

KW - urolithiasis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073577021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073577021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2019.0340

DO - 10.1089/end.2019.0340

M3 - Article

C2 - 31333058

AN - SCOPUS:85073577021

VL - 33

SP - 850

EP - 857

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 10

ER -