Quantitative Light Fluorescence (QLF) and Polarized White Light (PWL) assessments of dental fluorosis in an epidemiological setting

Iain A. Pretty, Michael McGrady, Christian Zakian, Roger P. Ellwood, Andrew Taylor, Mohammed Owaise Sharif, Timothy Iafolla, Esperanza Martinez Mier, Patcharawan Srisilapanan, Narumanas Korwanich, Michaela Goodwin, Bruce A. Dye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To determine if a novel dual camera imaging system employing both polarized white light (PWL) and quantitative light induced fluorescence imaging (QLF) is appropriate for measuring enamel fluorosis in an epidemiological setting. The use of remote and objective scoring systems is of importance in fluorosis assessments due to the potential risk of examiner bias using clinical methods. Methods. Subjects were recruited from a panel previously characterized for fluorosis and caries to ensure a range of fluorosis presentation. A total of 164 children, aged 11years (±1.3) participated following consent. Each child was examined using the novel imaging system, a traditional digital SLR camera, and clinically using the Deans and Thylstrup and Fejerskov (TF) Indices on the upper central and lateral incisors. Polarized white light and SLR images were scored for both Deans and TF indices by raters and fluorescence images were automatically scored using software. Results: Data from 164 children were available with a good distribution of fluorosis severity. The automated software analysis of QLF images demonstrated significant correlations with the clinical examinations for both Deans and TF index. Agreement (measured by weighted Kappas) between examiners scoring clinically, from polarized photographs and from SLR images ranged from 0.56 to 0.92. Conclusions: The study suggests that the use of a digital imaging system to capture images for either automated software analysis, or remote assessment by raters is suitable for epidemiological work. The use of recorded images enables study archiving, assessment by multiple examiners, remote assessment and objectivity due to the blinding of subject status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number366
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 21 2012

Fingerprint

Dental Fluorosis
Software
Fluorescence
Light
Optical Imaging
Incisor
Dental Enamel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Quantitative Light Fluorescence (QLF) and Polarized White Light (PWL) assessments of dental fluorosis in an epidemiological setting. / Pretty, Iain A.; McGrady, Michael; Zakian, Christian; Ellwood, Roger P.; Taylor, Andrew; Sharif, Mohammed Owaise; Iafolla, Timothy; Martinez Mier, Esperanza; Srisilapanan, Patcharawan; Korwanich, Narumanas; Goodwin, Michaela; Dye, Bruce A.

In: BMC Public Health, Vol. 12, No. 1, 366, 21.05.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pretty, IA, McGrady, M, Zakian, C, Ellwood, RP, Taylor, A, Sharif, MO, Iafolla, T, Martinez Mier, E, Srisilapanan, P, Korwanich, N, Goodwin, M & Dye, BA 2012, 'Quantitative Light Fluorescence (QLF) and Polarized White Light (PWL) assessments of dental fluorosis in an epidemiological setting', BMC Public Health, vol. 12, no. 1, 366. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-366
Pretty, Iain A. ; McGrady, Michael ; Zakian, Christian ; Ellwood, Roger P. ; Taylor, Andrew ; Sharif, Mohammed Owaise ; Iafolla, Timothy ; Martinez Mier, Esperanza ; Srisilapanan, Patcharawan ; Korwanich, Narumanas ; Goodwin, Michaela ; Dye, Bruce A. / Quantitative Light Fluorescence (QLF) and Polarized White Light (PWL) assessments of dental fluorosis in an epidemiological setting. In: BMC Public Health. 2012 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.
@article{8b064a28f6964f22a923bff23a953766,
title = "Quantitative Light Fluorescence (QLF) and Polarized White Light (PWL) assessments of dental fluorosis in an epidemiological setting",
abstract = "Background: To determine if a novel dual camera imaging system employing both polarized white light (PWL) and quantitative light induced fluorescence imaging (QLF) is appropriate for measuring enamel fluorosis in an epidemiological setting. The use of remote and objective scoring systems is of importance in fluorosis assessments due to the potential risk of examiner bias using clinical methods. Methods. Subjects were recruited from a panel previously characterized for fluorosis and caries to ensure a range of fluorosis presentation. A total of 164 children, aged 11years (±1.3) participated following consent. Each child was examined using the novel imaging system, a traditional digital SLR camera, and clinically using the Deans and Thylstrup and Fejerskov (TF) Indices on the upper central and lateral incisors. Polarized white light and SLR images were scored for both Deans and TF indices by raters and fluorescence images were automatically scored using software. Results: Data from 164 children were available with a good distribution of fluorosis severity. The automated software analysis of QLF images demonstrated significant correlations with the clinical examinations for both Deans and TF index. Agreement (measured by weighted Kappas) between examiners scoring clinically, from polarized photographs and from SLR images ranged from 0.56 to 0.92. Conclusions: The study suggests that the use of a digital imaging system to capture images for either automated software analysis, or remote assessment by raters is suitable for epidemiological work. The use of recorded images enables study archiving, assessment by multiple examiners, remote assessment and objectivity due to the blinding of subject status.",
author = "Pretty, {Iain A.} and Michael McGrady and Christian Zakian and Ellwood, {Roger P.} and Andrew Taylor and Sharif, {Mohammed Owaise} and Timothy Iafolla and {Martinez Mier}, Esperanza and Patcharawan Srisilapanan and Narumanas Korwanich and Michaela Goodwin and Dye, {Bruce A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2458-12-366",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "BMC Public Health",
issn = "1471-2458",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative Light Fluorescence (QLF) and Polarized White Light (PWL) assessments of dental fluorosis in an epidemiological setting

AU - Pretty, Iain A.

AU - McGrady, Michael

AU - Zakian, Christian

AU - Ellwood, Roger P.

AU - Taylor, Andrew

AU - Sharif, Mohammed Owaise

AU - Iafolla, Timothy

AU - Martinez Mier, Esperanza

AU - Srisilapanan, Patcharawan

AU - Korwanich, Narumanas

AU - Goodwin, Michaela

AU - Dye, Bruce A.

PY - 2012/5/21

Y1 - 2012/5/21

N2 - Background: To determine if a novel dual camera imaging system employing both polarized white light (PWL) and quantitative light induced fluorescence imaging (QLF) is appropriate for measuring enamel fluorosis in an epidemiological setting. The use of remote and objective scoring systems is of importance in fluorosis assessments due to the potential risk of examiner bias using clinical methods. Methods. Subjects were recruited from a panel previously characterized for fluorosis and caries to ensure a range of fluorosis presentation. A total of 164 children, aged 11years (±1.3) participated following consent. Each child was examined using the novel imaging system, a traditional digital SLR camera, and clinically using the Deans and Thylstrup and Fejerskov (TF) Indices on the upper central and lateral incisors. Polarized white light and SLR images were scored for both Deans and TF indices by raters and fluorescence images were automatically scored using software. Results: Data from 164 children were available with a good distribution of fluorosis severity. The automated software analysis of QLF images demonstrated significant correlations with the clinical examinations for both Deans and TF index. Agreement (measured by weighted Kappas) between examiners scoring clinically, from polarized photographs and from SLR images ranged from 0.56 to 0.92. Conclusions: The study suggests that the use of a digital imaging system to capture images for either automated software analysis, or remote assessment by raters is suitable for epidemiological work. The use of recorded images enables study archiving, assessment by multiple examiners, remote assessment and objectivity due to the blinding of subject status.

AB - Background: To determine if a novel dual camera imaging system employing both polarized white light (PWL) and quantitative light induced fluorescence imaging (QLF) is appropriate for measuring enamel fluorosis in an epidemiological setting. The use of remote and objective scoring systems is of importance in fluorosis assessments due to the potential risk of examiner bias using clinical methods. Methods. Subjects were recruited from a panel previously characterized for fluorosis and caries to ensure a range of fluorosis presentation. A total of 164 children, aged 11years (±1.3) participated following consent. Each child was examined using the novel imaging system, a traditional digital SLR camera, and clinically using the Deans and Thylstrup and Fejerskov (TF) Indices on the upper central and lateral incisors. Polarized white light and SLR images were scored for both Deans and TF indices by raters and fluorescence images were automatically scored using software. Results: Data from 164 children were available with a good distribution of fluorosis severity. The automated software analysis of QLF images demonstrated significant correlations with the clinical examinations for both Deans and TF index. Agreement (measured by weighted Kappas) between examiners scoring clinically, from polarized photographs and from SLR images ranged from 0.56 to 0.92. Conclusions: The study suggests that the use of a digital imaging system to capture images for either automated software analysis, or remote assessment by raters is suitable for epidemiological work. The use of recorded images enables study archiving, assessment by multiple examiners, remote assessment and objectivity due to the blinding of subject status.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861117547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861117547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-12-366

DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-12-366

M3 - Article

C2 - 22607363

AN - SCOPUS:84861117547

VL - 12

JO - BMC Public Health

JF - BMC Public Health

SN - 1471-2458

IS - 1

M1 - 366

ER -