Quantitative measurement of quality of life in adult patients undergoing bone marrow transplant or peripheral blood stem cell transplant: a decade in review.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To critically evaluate a decade of quantitative quality-of-life (QOL) measurement in adult patients undergoing bone marrow transplant (BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). DATA SOURCES: Quantitative research articles published between January 1990 and January 2000 in the nursing and medical literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: QOL measures reported in BMT and PBSCT literature support the multidimensional nature of the construct. The majority of studies used a single instrument to assess QOL. Variations in measurement included use of a single versus multiple instruments to assess QOL, theoretical underpinnings of instruments, and output (overall score, domain scores) provided by the instruments. CONCLUSIONS: A study's purpose, conceptual approach, patient burden, and resources available to the researcher should guide decisions regarding QOL instrumentation. No gold standard exists for assessing QOL in research or clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses can select from a variety of tools to measure QOL in the BMT and PBSCT patient populations. Clinicians must consider the clinical meaningfulness of changes in QOL before implementing changes in their practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)613-629
Number of pages17
JournalOncology Nursing Forum
Volume30
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bone Marrow
Quality of Life
Transplants
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells
Research
Nursing
Nurses
Research Personnel
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology(nursing)

Cite this

@article{cc8b652b1794498ebcdde9a701f63be5,
title = "Quantitative measurement of quality of life in adult patients undergoing bone marrow transplant or peripheral blood stem cell transplant: a decade in review.",
abstract = "PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To critically evaluate a decade of quantitative quality-of-life (QOL) measurement in adult patients undergoing bone marrow transplant (BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). DATA SOURCES: Quantitative research articles published between January 1990 and January 2000 in the nursing and medical literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: QOL measures reported in BMT and PBSCT literature support the multidimensional nature of the construct. The majority of studies used a single instrument to assess QOL. Variations in measurement included use of a single versus multiple instruments to assess QOL, theoretical underpinnings of instruments, and output (overall score, domain scores) provided by the instruments. CONCLUSIONS: A study's purpose, conceptual approach, patient burden, and resources available to the researcher should guide decisions regarding QOL instrumentation. No gold standard exists for assessing QOL in research or clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses can select from a variety of tools to measure QOL in the BMT and PBSCT patient populations. Clinicians must consider the clinical meaningfulness of changes in QOL before implementing changes in their practice.",
author = "Eileen Hacker",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "613--629",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "1538-0688",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative measurement of quality of life in adult patients undergoing bone marrow transplant or peripheral blood stem cell transplant

T2 - a decade in review.

AU - Hacker, Eileen

PY - 2003/7/1

Y1 - 2003/7/1

N2 - PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To critically evaluate a decade of quantitative quality-of-life (QOL) measurement in adult patients undergoing bone marrow transplant (BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). DATA SOURCES: Quantitative research articles published between January 1990 and January 2000 in the nursing and medical literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: QOL measures reported in BMT and PBSCT literature support the multidimensional nature of the construct. The majority of studies used a single instrument to assess QOL. Variations in measurement included use of a single versus multiple instruments to assess QOL, theoretical underpinnings of instruments, and output (overall score, domain scores) provided by the instruments. CONCLUSIONS: A study's purpose, conceptual approach, patient burden, and resources available to the researcher should guide decisions regarding QOL instrumentation. No gold standard exists for assessing QOL in research or clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses can select from a variety of tools to measure QOL in the BMT and PBSCT patient populations. Clinicians must consider the clinical meaningfulness of changes in QOL before implementing changes in their practice.

AB - PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To critically evaluate a decade of quantitative quality-of-life (QOL) measurement in adult patients undergoing bone marrow transplant (BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). DATA SOURCES: Quantitative research articles published between January 1990 and January 2000 in the nursing and medical literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: QOL measures reported in BMT and PBSCT literature support the multidimensional nature of the construct. The majority of studies used a single instrument to assess QOL. Variations in measurement included use of a single versus multiple instruments to assess QOL, theoretical underpinnings of instruments, and output (overall score, domain scores) provided by the instruments. CONCLUSIONS: A study's purpose, conceptual approach, patient burden, and resources available to the researcher should guide decisions regarding QOL instrumentation. No gold standard exists for assessing QOL in research or clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses can select from a variety of tools to measure QOL in the BMT and PBSCT patient populations. Clinicians must consider the clinical meaningfulness of changes in QOL before implementing changes in their practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042744054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042744054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 12861322

AN - SCOPUS:0042744054

VL - 30

SP - 613

EP - 629

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 1538-0688

IS - 4

ER -