Race and documentation of cognitive impairment in hospitalized older adults

Noll L. Campbell, Braca B. Cantor, Siu L. Hui, Anthony Perkins, Babar A. Khan, Mark O. Farber, Arif Nazir, Stephanie L. Garrett, E. Wesley Ely, Malaz A. Boustani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether race influences agreement between screening results and documentation of cognitive impairment and delirium. Design: Secondary data analysis. Setting: An urban, public hospital and healthcare system. Participants: Hospitalized older adults aged 65 and older admitted to general inpatient medical services evaluated for cognitive impairment (n = 851) and evaluated for delirium (n = 424). Measurements: Cognitive impairment and delirium were measured in each participant using the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) and the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), respectively, as the reference identification method. Clinical documentation of cognitive impairment and delirium was defined according to the presence of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), codes from within 1 year before hospitalization through discharge for cognitive impairment or from hospital admission through discharge for delirium. Results: Two hundred ninety-four participants (34%) had cognitive impairment based on SPMSQ performance, and 163 (38%) had delirium based on CAM results. One hundred seventy-one (20%) of those with cognitive impairment had an ICD-9 code for cognitive impairment, whereas 92 (22%) of those with delirium had an ICD-9 code for delirium. After considering age, sex, education, socioeconomic status, chronic comorbidity, and severity of acute illness, of those who screened positive on the SPMSQ, African Americans had a higher adjusted odds ratio (AOR) than non-African Americans for clinical documentation of cognitive impairment (AOR = 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95-2.89), and of those who screened negative on the SPMSQ, African Americans had higher odds of clinical documentation of cognitive impairment (AOR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.17-3.78) than non-African Americans. There were no differences in clinical documentation rates of delirium between African Americans and non-African Americans. Conclusion: Racial differences in coding for cognitive impairment may exist, resulting in higher documentation of cognitive impairment in African Americans screening positive or negative for cognitive impairment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)506-511
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Keywords

  • cognitive impairment
  • delirium
  • race

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Race and documentation of cognitive impairment in hospitalized older adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this