Radiographic detection of gravel in soft tissue

C. D. Chisholm, C. O. Wood, G. Chua, W. H. Cordell, D. R. Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: We sought to quantify the detectable size of varying compositions of gravel using a cadaveric chicken leg wound model and standard plain-film two-view radiographs. Methods: We conducted a randomized, blinded, descriptive study with the assistance of faculty from the emergency medicine and radiology residency programs of a private urban teaching hospital. A standardized wound was created in each of 160 cadaver chicken legs. Zero, one, or two pieces of gravel of four differing compositions, ranging in size from .25 to 2.0 mm, were inserted into the wounds as determined with computer-generated randomization. The legs were then radiographically imaged (anteroposterior and lateral views). Three faculty physicians independently interpreted the radiographs to determine the number of foreign bodies and rated the ease of visibility. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability. Results: The accuracy with which gravel was detected ranged from an average of 97.7% for 2-mm and 1-mm particles to less than 75% for .5-mm and .25-mm particles. Visibility ratings were also lower for particles in the smaller ranges. Sensitivity was greater for the emergency physicians than for the radiologists, but their specificity was lower. Salt-and-pepper gravel was the most easily identified foreign body. Conclusion: In this wound model, gravel particles of less than 1 mm were not accurately identified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)725-730
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume29
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1997

Fingerprint

Leg
Wounds and Injuries
Foreign Bodies
Chickens
Physicians
Private Hospitals
Emergency Medicine
Urban Hospitals
Internship and Residency
Random Allocation
Cadaver
Radiology
Teaching Hospitals
Emergencies
Salts
Sensitivity and Specificity
Radiologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Chisholm, C. D., Wood, C. O., Chua, G., Cordell, W. H., & Nelson, D. R. (1997). Radiographic detection of gravel in soft tissue. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 29(6), 725-730.

Radiographic detection of gravel in soft tissue. / Chisholm, C. D.; Wood, C. O.; Chua, G.; Cordell, W. H.; Nelson, D. R.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 6, 1997, p. 725-730.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chisholm, CD, Wood, CO, Chua, G, Cordell, WH & Nelson, DR 1997, 'Radiographic detection of gravel in soft tissue', Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 725-730.
Chisholm CD, Wood CO, Chua G, Cordell WH, Nelson DR. Radiographic detection of gravel in soft tissue. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1997;29(6):725-730.
Chisholm, C. D. ; Wood, C. O. ; Chua, G. ; Cordell, W. H. ; Nelson, D. R. / Radiographic detection of gravel in soft tissue. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1997 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 725-730.
@article{557d19ff441843de932e52763c5b1cfd,
title = "Radiographic detection of gravel in soft tissue",
abstract = "Study objective: We sought to quantify the detectable size of varying compositions of gravel using a cadaveric chicken leg wound model and standard plain-film two-view radiographs. Methods: We conducted a randomized, blinded, descriptive study with the assistance of faculty from the emergency medicine and radiology residency programs of a private urban teaching hospital. A standardized wound was created in each of 160 cadaver chicken legs. Zero, one, or two pieces of gravel of four differing compositions, ranging in size from .25 to 2.0 mm, were inserted into the wounds as determined with computer-generated randomization. The legs were then radiographically imaged (anteroposterior and lateral views). Three faculty physicians independently interpreted the radiographs to determine the number of foreign bodies and rated the ease of visibility. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability. Results: The accuracy with which gravel was detected ranged from an average of 97.7{\%} for 2-mm and 1-mm particles to less than 75{\%} for .5-mm and .25-mm particles. Visibility ratings were also lower for particles in the smaller ranges. Sensitivity was greater for the emergency physicians than for the radiologists, but their specificity was lower. Salt-and-pepper gravel was the most easily identified foreign body. Conclusion: In this wound model, gravel particles of less than 1 mm were not accurately identified.",
author = "Chisholm, {C. D.} and Wood, {C. O.} and G. Chua and Cordell, {W. H.} and Nelson, {D. R.}",
year = "1997",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "725--730",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiographic detection of gravel in soft tissue

AU - Chisholm, C. D.

AU - Wood, C. O.

AU - Chua, G.

AU - Cordell, W. H.

AU - Nelson, D. R.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - Study objective: We sought to quantify the detectable size of varying compositions of gravel using a cadaveric chicken leg wound model and standard plain-film two-view radiographs. Methods: We conducted a randomized, blinded, descriptive study with the assistance of faculty from the emergency medicine and radiology residency programs of a private urban teaching hospital. A standardized wound was created in each of 160 cadaver chicken legs. Zero, one, or two pieces of gravel of four differing compositions, ranging in size from .25 to 2.0 mm, were inserted into the wounds as determined with computer-generated randomization. The legs were then radiographically imaged (anteroposterior and lateral views). Three faculty physicians independently interpreted the radiographs to determine the number of foreign bodies and rated the ease of visibility. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability. Results: The accuracy with which gravel was detected ranged from an average of 97.7% for 2-mm and 1-mm particles to less than 75% for .5-mm and .25-mm particles. Visibility ratings were also lower for particles in the smaller ranges. Sensitivity was greater for the emergency physicians than for the radiologists, but their specificity was lower. Salt-and-pepper gravel was the most easily identified foreign body. Conclusion: In this wound model, gravel particles of less than 1 mm were not accurately identified.

AB - Study objective: We sought to quantify the detectable size of varying compositions of gravel using a cadaveric chicken leg wound model and standard plain-film two-view radiographs. Methods: We conducted a randomized, blinded, descriptive study with the assistance of faculty from the emergency medicine and radiology residency programs of a private urban teaching hospital. A standardized wound was created in each of 160 cadaver chicken legs. Zero, one, or two pieces of gravel of four differing compositions, ranging in size from .25 to 2.0 mm, were inserted into the wounds as determined with computer-generated randomization. The legs were then radiographically imaged (anteroposterior and lateral views). Three faculty physicians independently interpreted the radiographs to determine the number of foreign bodies and rated the ease of visibility. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability. Results: The accuracy with which gravel was detected ranged from an average of 97.7% for 2-mm and 1-mm particles to less than 75% for .5-mm and .25-mm particles. Visibility ratings were also lower for particles in the smaller ranges. Sensitivity was greater for the emergency physicians than for the radiologists, but their specificity was lower. Salt-and-pepper gravel was the most easily identified foreign body. Conclusion: In this wound model, gravel particles of less than 1 mm were not accurately identified.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030974337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030974337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9174515

AN - SCOPUS:0030974337

VL - 29

SP - 725

EP - 730

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 6

ER -