Radiology reporting in an academic children's hospital: What referring physicians think

Richard Gunderman, Walter T. Ambrosius, Mervyn Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Transcribed reports are the radiologist's most conspicuous and enduring product, yet relatively little investigation of report quality has been undertaken by radiologists. This paper reports the results of a survey of 266 referring physicians in an academic children's hospital regarding their needs and assessments of the quality of radiology reporting. The results outline the range and relative importance of report features from referring physicians' points of view, provide specific suggestions for how to improve reporting performance, and generally indicate that reporting should receive more attention in training and practice than it currently does.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)307-314
Number of pages8
JournalPediatric Radiology
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Radiology reporting in an academic children's hospital: What referring physicians think'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this