Abstract
Transcribed reports are the radiologist's most conspicuous and enduring product, yet relatively little investigation of report quality has been undertaken by radiologists. This paper reports the results of a survey of 266 referring physicians in an academic children's hospital regarding their needs and assessments of the quality of radiology reporting. The results outline the range and relative importance of report features from referring physicians' points of view, provide specific suggestions for how to improve reporting performance, and generally indicate that reporting should receive more attention in training and practice than it currently does.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 307-314 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Pediatric Radiology |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2000 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
- Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Cite this
Radiology reporting in an academic children's hospital : What referring physicians think. / Gunderman, Richard; Ambrosius, Walter T.; Cohen, Mervyn.
In: Pediatric Radiology, Vol. 30, No. 5, 05.2000, p. 307-314.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiology reporting in an academic children's hospital
T2 - What referring physicians think
AU - Gunderman, Richard
AU - Ambrosius, Walter T.
AU - Cohen, Mervyn
PY - 2000/5
Y1 - 2000/5
N2 - Transcribed reports are the radiologist's most conspicuous and enduring product, yet relatively little investigation of report quality has been undertaken by radiologists. This paper reports the results of a survey of 266 referring physicians in an academic children's hospital regarding their needs and assessments of the quality of radiology reporting. The results outline the range and relative importance of report features from referring physicians' points of view, provide specific suggestions for how to improve reporting performance, and generally indicate that reporting should receive more attention in training and practice than it currently does.
AB - Transcribed reports are the radiologist's most conspicuous and enduring product, yet relatively little investigation of report quality has been undertaken by radiologists. This paper reports the results of a survey of 266 referring physicians in an academic children's hospital regarding their needs and assessments of the quality of radiology reporting. The results outline the range and relative importance of report features from referring physicians' points of view, provide specific suggestions for how to improve reporting performance, and generally indicate that reporting should receive more attention in training and practice than it currently does.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034105916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034105916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s002470050746
DO - 10.1007/s002470050746
M3 - Article
C2 - 10836592
AN - SCOPUS:0034105916
VL - 30
SP - 307
EP - 314
JO - Pediatric Radiology
JF - Pediatric Radiology
SN - 0301-0449
IS - 5
ER -