Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma

Jonathan I. Epstein, John Srigley, David Grignon, Peter Humphrey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been evident for decades that pathology reports are very variable even within a single institution. Standardization of reporting is the optimal way to insure that information necessary for patient management, prognostic and predictive factor assessment, grading, staging, analysis of outcomes, and tumor registries are included in pathology reports. The ADASP has chosen a pathologist expert in each field to assemble a group from within the pathology community (with clinician input if desired) to write specific cancer protocols. These were then approved by the ADASP council and subsequently by the membership. The American College of Surgery Commission on Cancer (COC) accredits cancer centers in the United States. Recently, the COC decided to require elements, deemed as essential by the CAP, to be described in all pathology reports in their accredited cancer centers as of January 2004. Importantly, they do not require that the specific College of Pathologists (CAP) protocols or synoptic reports be used. ADASP has updated all of its protocols to comply with the COC requirements in the form of uniform checklists. The checklists use the staging criteria cited in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 2002 staging manual (sixth edition) but include a variety of other references listed in each of the checklists. Moreover, the checklists are formatted for ease of use. They may be used as templates for uniform reporting and are designed to be compatible with voice-activated transcription. The different elements in these revised ADASP diagnostic checklists have been divided into Required and Optional. The term Required in this context only signifies compliance with the COC guidelines. ADASP realizes that specimens and practices vary, and it will not be possible to report these elements in every case. However, ADASP hopes that pathologists will find these checklists useful in daily clinical practice while facilitating compliance with the new COC requirements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1305-1309
Number of pages5
JournalHuman Pathology
Volume38
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Prostate
Checklist
Carcinoma
Neoplasms
Pathology
Neoplasm Staging
Registries
Guidelines
Pathologists

Keywords

  • ADASP
  • Practice Guidelines
  • Prostate Practice Guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma. / Epstein, Jonathan I.; Srigley, John; Grignon, David; Humphrey, Peter.

In: Human Pathology, Vol. 38, No. 9, 09.2007, p. 1305-1309.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Epstein, Jonathan I. ; Srigley, John ; Grignon, David ; Humphrey, Peter. / Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma. In: Human Pathology. 2007 ; Vol. 38, No. 9. pp. 1305-1309.
@article{7a5659cf854b479890cee0f8fc23bab2,
title = "Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma",
abstract = "It has been evident for decades that pathology reports are very variable even within a single institution. Standardization of reporting is the optimal way to insure that information necessary for patient management, prognostic and predictive factor assessment, grading, staging, analysis of outcomes, and tumor registries are included in pathology reports. The ADASP has chosen a pathologist expert in each field to assemble a group from within the pathology community (with clinician input if desired) to write specific cancer protocols. These were then approved by the ADASP council and subsequently by the membership. The American College of Surgery Commission on Cancer (COC) accredits cancer centers in the United States. Recently, the COC decided to require elements, deemed as essential by the CAP, to be described in all pathology reports in their accredited cancer centers as of January 2004. Importantly, they do not require that the specific College of Pathologists (CAP) protocols or synoptic reports be used. ADASP has updated all of its protocols to comply with the COC requirements in the form of uniform checklists. The checklists use the staging criteria cited in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 2002 staging manual (sixth edition) but include a variety of other references listed in each of the checklists. Moreover, the checklists are formatted for ease of use. They may be used as templates for uniform reporting and are designed to be compatible with voice-activated transcription. The different elements in these revised ADASP diagnostic checklists have been divided into Required and Optional. The term Required in this context only signifies compliance with the COC guidelines. ADASP realizes that specimens and practices vary, and it will not be possible to report these elements in every case. However, ADASP hopes that pathologists will find these checklists useful in daily clinical practice while facilitating compliance with the new COC requirements.",
keywords = "ADASP, Practice Guidelines, Prostate Practice Guidelines",
author = "Epstein, {Jonathan I.} and John Srigley and David Grignon and Peter Humphrey",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.humpath.2007.05.015",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "1305--1309",
journal = "Human Pathology",
issn = "0046-8177",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations for the reporting of prostate carcinoma

AU - Epstein, Jonathan I.

AU - Srigley, John

AU - Grignon, David

AU - Humphrey, Peter

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - It has been evident for decades that pathology reports are very variable even within a single institution. Standardization of reporting is the optimal way to insure that information necessary for patient management, prognostic and predictive factor assessment, grading, staging, analysis of outcomes, and tumor registries are included in pathology reports. The ADASP has chosen a pathologist expert in each field to assemble a group from within the pathology community (with clinician input if desired) to write specific cancer protocols. These were then approved by the ADASP council and subsequently by the membership. The American College of Surgery Commission on Cancer (COC) accredits cancer centers in the United States. Recently, the COC decided to require elements, deemed as essential by the CAP, to be described in all pathology reports in their accredited cancer centers as of January 2004. Importantly, they do not require that the specific College of Pathologists (CAP) protocols or synoptic reports be used. ADASP has updated all of its protocols to comply with the COC requirements in the form of uniform checklists. The checklists use the staging criteria cited in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 2002 staging manual (sixth edition) but include a variety of other references listed in each of the checklists. Moreover, the checklists are formatted for ease of use. They may be used as templates for uniform reporting and are designed to be compatible with voice-activated transcription. The different elements in these revised ADASP diagnostic checklists have been divided into Required and Optional. The term Required in this context only signifies compliance with the COC guidelines. ADASP realizes that specimens and practices vary, and it will not be possible to report these elements in every case. However, ADASP hopes that pathologists will find these checklists useful in daily clinical practice while facilitating compliance with the new COC requirements.

AB - It has been evident for decades that pathology reports are very variable even within a single institution. Standardization of reporting is the optimal way to insure that information necessary for patient management, prognostic and predictive factor assessment, grading, staging, analysis of outcomes, and tumor registries are included in pathology reports. The ADASP has chosen a pathologist expert in each field to assemble a group from within the pathology community (with clinician input if desired) to write specific cancer protocols. These were then approved by the ADASP council and subsequently by the membership. The American College of Surgery Commission on Cancer (COC) accredits cancer centers in the United States. Recently, the COC decided to require elements, deemed as essential by the CAP, to be described in all pathology reports in their accredited cancer centers as of January 2004. Importantly, they do not require that the specific College of Pathologists (CAP) protocols or synoptic reports be used. ADASP has updated all of its protocols to comply with the COC requirements in the form of uniform checklists. The checklists use the staging criteria cited in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 2002 staging manual (sixth edition) but include a variety of other references listed in each of the checklists. Moreover, the checklists are formatted for ease of use. They may be used as templates for uniform reporting and are designed to be compatible with voice-activated transcription. The different elements in these revised ADASP diagnostic checklists have been divided into Required and Optional. The term Required in this context only signifies compliance with the COC guidelines. ADASP realizes that specimens and practices vary, and it will not be possible to report these elements in every case. However, ADASP hopes that pathologists will find these checklists useful in daily clinical practice while facilitating compliance with the new COC requirements.

KW - ADASP

KW - Practice Guidelines

KW - Prostate Practice Guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547828810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547828810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.05.015

DO - 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.05.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 17707261

AN - SCOPUS:34547828810

VL - 38

SP - 1305

EP - 1309

JO - Human Pathology

JF - Human Pathology

SN - 0046-8177

IS - 9

ER -