Reducing Operating Room Costs Through Real-Time Cost Information Feedback

A Pilot Study

Christian H. Tabib, Clinton Bahler, Thomas J. Hardacker, Kevin M. Ball, Chandru Sundaram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To create a protocol for providing real-time operating room (OR) cost feedback to surgeons. We hypothesize that this protocol will reduce costs in a responsible way without sacrificing quality of care. Methods: All OR costs were obtained and recorded for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Before the beginning of this project, costs pertaining to the 20 most recent cases were analyzed. Items were identified from previous cases as modifiable for replacement or omission. Timely feedback of total OR costs and cost of each item used was provided to the surgeon after each case, and costs were analyzed. Results: A cost analysis of the robot-assisted partial nephrectomy before the washout period indicates expenditures of $5243.04 per case. Ten recommended modifiable items were found to have an average per case cost of $1229.33 representing 23.4% of the total cost. A postwashout period cost analysis found the total OR cost decreased by $899.67 (17.2%) because of changes directly related to the modifiable items. Therefore, 73.2% of the possible identified savings was realized. The same stepwise approach was applied to laparoscopic donor nephrectomies. The average total cost per case before the washout period was $3530.05 with $457.54 attributed to modifiable items. After the washout period, modifiable items costs were reduced by $289.73 (8.0%). No complications occurred in the donor nephrectomy cases while one postoperative complication occurred in the partial nephrectomy group. Conclusion: Providing surgeons with feedback related to OR costs may lead to a change in surgeon behavior and decreased overall costs. Further studies are needed to show equivalence in patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)963-968
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Operating Rooms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Nephrectomy
Tissue Donors
Quality of Health Care
Health Expenditures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Reducing Operating Room Costs Through Real-Time Cost Information Feedback : A Pilot Study. / Tabib, Christian H.; Bahler, Clinton; Hardacker, Thomas J.; Ball, Kevin M.; Sundaram, Chandru.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 29, No. 8, 01.08.2015, p. 963-968.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tabib, Christian H. ; Bahler, Clinton ; Hardacker, Thomas J. ; Ball, Kevin M. ; Sundaram, Chandru. / Reducing Operating Room Costs Through Real-Time Cost Information Feedback : A Pilot Study. In: Journal of Endourology. 2015 ; Vol. 29, No. 8. pp. 963-968.
@article{8c63e52ac0f5430da8bd445dd81b00a0,
title = "Reducing Operating Room Costs Through Real-Time Cost Information Feedback: A Pilot Study",
abstract = "Purpose: To create a protocol for providing real-time operating room (OR) cost feedback to surgeons. We hypothesize that this protocol will reduce costs in a responsible way without sacrificing quality of care. Methods: All OR costs were obtained and recorded for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Before the beginning of this project, costs pertaining to the 20 most recent cases were analyzed. Items were identified from previous cases as modifiable for replacement or omission. Timely feedback of total OR costs and cost of each item used was provided to the surgeon after each case, and costs were analyzed. Results: A cost analysis of the robot-assisted partial nephrectomy before the washout period indicates expenditures of $5243.04 per case. Ten recommended modifiable items were found to have an average per case cost of $1229.33 representing 23.4{\%} of the total cost. A postwashout period cost analysis found the total OR cost decreased by $899.67 (17.2{\%}) because of changes directly related to the modifiable items. Therefore, 73.2{\%} of the possible identified savings was realized. The same stepwise approach was applied to laparoscopic donor nephrectomies. The average total cost per case before the washout period was $3530.05 with $457.54 attributed to modifiable items. After the washout period, modifiable items costs were reduced by $289.73 (8.0{\%}). No complications occurred in the donor nephrectomy cases while one postoperative complication occurred in the partial nephrectomy group. Conclusion: Providing surgeons with feedback related to OR costs may lead to a change in surgeon behavior and decreased overall costs. Further studies are needed to show equivalence in patient outcomes.",
author = "Tabib, {Christian H.} and Clinton Bahler and Hardacker, {Thomas J.} and Ball, {Kevin M.} and Chandru Sundaram",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2014.0858",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "963--968",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reducing Operating Room Costs Through Real-Time Cost Information Feedback

T2 - A Pilot Study

AU - Tabib, Christian H.

AU - Bahler, Clinton

AU - Hardacker, Thomas J.

AU - Ball, Kevin M.

AU - Sundaram, Chandru

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Purpose: To create a protocol for providing real-time operating room (OR) cost feedback to surgeons. We hypothesize that this protocol will reduce costs in a responsible way without sacrificing quality of care. Methods: All OR costs were obtained and recorded for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Before the beginning of this project, costs pertaining to the 20 most recent cases were analyzed. Items were identified from previous cases as modifiable for replacement or omission. Timely feedback of total OR costs and cost of each item used was provided to the surgeon after each case, and costs were analyzed. Results: A cost analysis of the robot-assisted partial nephrectomy before the washout period indicates expenditures of $5243.04 per case. Ten recommended modifiable items were found to have an average per case cost of $1229.33 representing 23.4% of the total cost. A postwashout period cost analysis found the total OR cost decreased by $899.67 (17.2%) because of changes directly related to the modifiable items. Therefore, 73.2% of the possible identified savings was realized. The same stepwise approach was applied to laparoscopic donor nephrectomies. The average total cost per case before the washout period was $3530.05 with $457.54 attributed to modifiable items. After the washout period, modifiable items costs were reduced by $289.73 (8.0%). No complications occurred in the donor nephrectomy cases while one postoperative complication occurred in the partial nephrectomy group. Conclusion: Providing surgeons with feedback related to OR costs may lead to a change in surgeon behavior and decreased overall costs. Further studies are needed to show equivalence in patient outcomes.

AB - Purpose: To create a protocol for providing real-time operating room (OR) cost feedback to surgeons. We hypothesize that this protocol will reduce costs in a responsible way without sacrificing quality of care. Methods: All OR costs were obtained and recorded for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Before the beginning of this project, costs pertaining to the 20 most recent cases were analyzed. Items were identified from previous cases as modifiable for replacement or omission. Timely feedback of total OR costs and cost of each item used was provided to the surgeon after each case, and costs were analyzed. Results: A cost analysis of the robot-assisted partial nephrectomy before the washout period indicates expenditures of $5243.04 per case. Ten recommended modifiable items were found to have an average per case cost of $1229.33 representing 23.4% of the total cost. A postwashout period cost analysis found the total OR cost decreased by $899.67 (17.2%) because of changes directly related to the modifiable items. Therefore, 73.2% of the possible identified savings was realized. The same stepwise approach was applied to laparoscopic donor nephrectomies. The average total cost per case before the washout period was $3530.05 with $457.54 attributed to modifiable items. After the washout period, modifiable items costs were reduced by $289.73 (8.0%). No complications occurred in the donor nephrectomy cases while one postoperative complication occurred in the partial nephrectomy group. Conclusion: Providing surgeons with feedback related to OR costs may lead to a change in surgeon behavior and decreased overall costs. Further studies are needed to show equivalence in patient outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939424960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939424960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2014.0858

DO - 10.1089/end.2014.0858

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 963

EP - 968

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 8

ER -