Referring physicians' decision making for pediatric anti-reflux procedures

Jonathan C. Papic, S. Maria Finnell, Charles M. Leys, William E. Bennett, Stephen Downs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Rates of anti-reflux procedures (ARP) vary greatly among pediatric hospitals. How pediatric subspecialists make referral decisions for ARPs has not been described. The aim of this study was to characterize pediatric subspecialists' decision making for referring children for ARPs. Methods Pediatric subspecialists at a single children's hospital were interviewed about their decision making when referring for ARPs. Qualitative analysis was performed on clinicians' perceptions of the risks and benefits of the treatment options. Clinical algorithms were derived from each interview and were compared using the Clinical Algorithm Nosology. Clinical Algorithm Structural Analysis (CASA) scores were calculated to assess algorithm complexity. Clinical Algorithm Patient Abstraction (CAPA) scores on a scale from 0 (different) to 10 (identical) were generated based on algorithm agreement. Results The interviews yielded 15 algorithms. There was substantial variation in the providers' perceived risks and benefits of the treatment options. CASA scores ranged from 8 to 28 and CAPA scores ranged from 0 to 5.7 (median, 0), indicating great variation in both complexity and patient management. Management variation included testing (33% of algorithms incorporated pH probe test, 67% upper gastrointestinal, and 47% small bowel follow-through), procedure contraindications (33% considered history of gagging a contraindication to ARP), and use of gastrojejunostomy tubes (20% using gastrojejunostomy tube before ARP). Conclusion No standards exist for the decision to refer children with gastroesophageal reflux disease for ARP. There is great variation among pediatric subspecialists in their decision making. Differences in providers' perception of the risks and benefits of these procedures contribute to this variation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)851-859
Number of pages9
JournalSurgery
Volume155
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Pediatrics
Physicians
Gastric Bypass
Gagging
Interviews
Pediatric Hospitals
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Referral and Consultation
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Referring physicians' decision making for pediatric anti-reflux procedures. / Papic, Jonathan C.; Finnell, S. Maria; Leys, Charles M.; Bennett, William E.; Downs, Stephen.

In: Surgery, Vol. 155, No. 5, 2014, p. 851-859.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Papic, Jonathan C. ; Finnell, S. Maria ; Leys, Charles M. ; Bennett, William E. ; Downs, Stephen. / Referring physicians' decision making for pediatric anti-reflux procedures. In: Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 155, No. 5. pp. 851-859.
@article{48f44f1e38d647e399f5711b127315c2,
title = "Referring physicians' decision making for pediatric anti-reflux procedures",
abstract = "Background Rates of anti-reflux procedures (ARP) vary greatly among pediatric hospitals. How pediatric subspecialists make referral decisions for ARPs has not been described. The aim of this study was to characterize pediatric subspecialists' decision making for referring children for ARPs. Methods Pediatric subspecialists at a single children's hospital were interviewed about their decision making when referring for ARPs. Qualitative analysis was performed on clinicians' perceptions of the risks and benefits of the treatment options. Clinical algorithms were derived from each interview and were compared using the Clinical Algorithm Nosology. Clinical Algorithm Structural Analysis (CASA) scores were calculated to assess algorithm complexity. Clinical Algorithm Patient Abstraction (CAPA) scores on a scale from 0 (different) to 10 (identical) were generated based on algorithm agreement. Results The interviews yielded 15 algorithms. There was substantial variation in the providers' perceived risks and benefits of the treatment options. CASA scores ranged from 8 to 28 and CAPA scores ranged from 0 to 5.7 (median, 0), indicating great variation in both complexity and patient management. Management variation included testing (33{\%} of algorithms incorporated pH probe test, 67{\%} upper gastrointestinal, and 47{\%} small bowel follow-through), procedure contraindications (33{\%} considered history of gagging a contraindication to ARP), and use of gastrojejunostomy tubes (20{\%} using gastrojejunostomy tube before ARP). Conclusion No standards exist for the decision to refer children with gastroesophageal reflux disease for ARP. There is great variation among pediatric subspecialists in their decision making. Differences in providers' perception of the risks and benefits of these procedures contribute to this variation.",
author = "Papic, {Jonathan C.} and Finnell, {S. Maria} and Leys, {Charles M.} and Bennett, {William E.} and Stephen Downs",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.014",
language = "English",
volume = "155",
pages = "851--859",
journal = "Surgery",
issn = "0039-6060",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Referring physicians' decision making for pediatric anti-reflux procedures

AU - Papic, Jonathan C.

AU - Finnell, S. Maria

AU - Leys, Charles M.

AU - Bennett, William E.

AU - Downs, Stephen

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background Rates of anti-reflux procedures (ARP) vary greatly among pediatric hospitals. How pediatric subspecialists make referral decisions for ARPs has not been described. The aim of this study was to characterize pediatric subspecialists' decision making for referring children for ARPs. Methods Pediatric subspecialists at a single children's hospital were interviewed about their decision making when referring for ARPs. Qualitative analysis was performed on clinicians' perceptions of the risks and benefits of the treatment options. Clinical algorithms were derived from each interview and were compared using the Clinical Algorithm Nosology. Clinical Algorithm Structural Analysis (CASA) scores were calculated to assess algorithm complexity. Clinical Algorithm Patient Abstraction (CAPA) scores on a scale from 0 (different) to 10 (identical) were generated based on algorithm agreement. Results The interviews yielded 15 algorithms. There was substantial variation in the providers' perceived risks and benefits of the treatment options. CASA scores ranged from 8 to 28 and CAPA scores ranged from 0 to 5.7 (median, 0), indicating great variation in both complexity and patient management. Management variation included testing (33% of algorithms incorporated pH probe test, 67% upper gastrointestinal, and 47% small bowel follow-through), procedure contraindications (33% considered history of gagging a contraindication to ARP), and use of gastrojejunostomy tubes (20% using gastrojejunostomy tube before ARP). Conclusion No standards exist for the decision to refer children with gastroesophageal reflux disease for ARP. There is great variation among pediatric subspecialists in their decision making. Differences in providers' perception of the risks and benefits of these procedures contribute to this variation.

AB - Background Rates of anti-reflux procedures (ARP) vary greatly among pediatric hospitals. How pediatric subspecialists make referral decisions for ARPs has not been described. The aim of this study was to characterize pediatric subspecialists' decision making for referring children for ARPs. Methods Pediatric subspecialists at a single children's hospital were interviewed about their decision making when referring for ARPs. Qualitative analysis was performed on clinicians' perceptions of the risks and benefits of the treatment options. Clinical algorithms were derived from each interview and were compared using the Clinical Algorithm Nosology. Clinical Algorithm Structural Analysis (CASA) scores were calculated to assess algorithm complexity. Clinical Algorithm Patient Abstraction (CAPA) scores on a scale from 0 (different) to 10 (identical) were generated based on algorithm agreement. Results The interviews yielded 15 algorithms. There was substantial variation in the providers' perceived risks and benefits of the treatment options. CASA scores ranged from 8 to 28 and CAPA scores ranged from 0 to 5.7 (median, 0), indicating great variation in both complexity and patient management. Management variation included testing (33% of algorithms incorporated pH probe test, 67% upper gastrointestinal, and 47% small bowel follow-through), procedure contraindications (33% considered history of gagging a contraindication to ARP), and use of gastrojejunostomy tubes (20% using gastrojejunostomy tube before ARP). Conclusion No standards exist for the decision to refer children with gastroesophageal reflux disease for ARP. There is great variation among pediatric subspecialists in their decision making. Differences in providers' perception of the risks and benefits of these procedures contribute to this variation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899628660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899628660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.014

DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 24787112

AN - SCOPUS:84899628660

VL - 155

SP - 851

EP - 859

JO - Surgery

JF - Surgery

SN - 0039-6060

IS - 5

ER -