Refining a questionnaire to assess breast cancer knowledge and barriers to screening in Kenya

Psychometric assessment of the BCAM

J. Wachira, A. Busakhala, F. Chite, V. Naanyu, J. Kisuya, G. Otieno, A. Keter, A. Mwangi, Thomas Inui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Our study objective was to determine the validity and reliability of the breast module of a cancer awareness measure (BCAM) among adult women in western Kenya. Methods: The study was conducted between October and November 2012, following three breast cancer screening events. Purposive and systematic random sampling methods were used to identity 48 women for cognitive focus group discussions, and 1061 (594 who attended vs. 467 who did not attend screening events) for surveys, respectively. Face and psychometric validity of the BCAM survey was assessed using cognitive testing, factor analysis of survey data, and correlations. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results: Among survey participants, the overall median age was 34 (IQR: 26-44) years. Compared to those women who did not attend the screening events, women attendees were older (median: 35 vs. 32 years, p = 0.001) more often married (79% vs. 72%, p = 0.006), more educated (52% vs. 46% with more than an elementary level of education, p = 0.001), more unemployed (59% vs. 11%, p = 0.001), more likely to report doing breast self-examination (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.001) and more likely to report having felt a breast lump (16% vs. 7%, p = 0.001). For domain 1 on knowledge of breast cancer symptoms, one factor (three items) with Eigen value of 1.76 emerged for the group that did not attend screening, and 1.50 for the group that attended screening. For both groups two factors (factor 1 "internal influences" and factor 2 "external influences") emerged among domain 4 on barriers to screening, with varied item loadings and Eigen values. There were no statistically significant differences in the factor scores between attendees and non-attendees. There were significant associations between factor scores and other attributes of the surveyed population, including associations with occupation, transportation type, and training for and practice of breast self-examination. Cronbach's alpha showed an acceptable internal consistency. Conclusion: Certain subpopulations are less likely than others to attend breast screening in Kenya. A survey measure of breast cancer knowledge and perceived barriers to screening shows promise for use in Kenya for characterizing clinical and community population beliefs, but needs adaptation for setting, language and culture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number110
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 3 2017

Fingerprint

Kenya
Psychometrics
Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Breast Self-Examination
Neoplasms
Reproducibility of Results
Focus Groups
Early Detection of Cancer
Occupations
Population
Statistical Factor Analysis
Language
Surveys and Questionnaires
Education

Keywords

  • Barriers to screening
  • Breast cancer
  • Kenya
  • Knowledge
  • Psychometric assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Refining a questionnaire to assess breast cancer knowledge and barriers to screening in Kenya : Psychometric assessment of the BCAM. / Wachira, J.; Busakhala, A.; Chite, F.; Naanyu, V.; Kisuya, J.; Otieno, G.; Keter, A.; Mwangi, A.; Inui, Thomas.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 17, No. 1, 110, 03.02.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wachira, J. ; Busakhala, A. ; Chite, F. ; Naanyu, V. ; Kisuya, J. ; Otieno, G. ; Keter, A. ; Mwangi, A. ; Inui, Thomas. / Refining a questionnaire to assess breast cancer knowledge and barriers to screening in Kenya : Psychometric assessment of the BCAM. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 1.
@article{202705f7534048c8a6cc8c83464e32cb,
title = "Refining a questionnaire to assess breast cancer knowledge and barriers to screening in Kenya: Psychometric assessment of the BCAM",
abstract = "Background: Our study objective was to determine the validity and reliability of the breast module of a cancer awareness measure (BCAM) among adult women in western Kenya. Methods: The study was conducted between October and November 2012, following three breast cancer screening events. Purposive and systematic random sampling methods were used to identity 48 women for cognitive focus group discussions, and 1061 (594 who attended vs. 467 who did not attend screening events) for surveys, respectively. Face and psychometric validity of the BCAM survey was assessed using cognitive testing, factor analysis of survey data, and correlations. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results: Among survey participants, the overall median age was 34 (IQR: 26-44) years. Compared to those women who did not attend the screening events, women attendees were older (median: 35 vs. 32 years, p = 0.001) more often married (79{\%} vs. 72{\%}, p = 0.006), more educated (52{\%} vs. 46{\%} with more than an elementary level of education, p = 0.001), more unemployed (59{\%} vs. 11{\%}, p = 0.001), more likely to report doing breast self-examination (56{\%} vs. 40{\%}, p = 0.001) and more likely to report having felt a breast lump (16{\%} vs. 7{\%}, p = 0.001). For domain 1 on knowledge of breast cancer symptoms, one factor (three items) with Eigen value of 1.76 emerged for the group that did not attend screening, and 1.50 for the group that attended screening. For both groups two factors (factor 1 {"}internal influences{"} and factor 2 {"}external influences{"}) emerged among domain 4 on barriers to screening, with varied item loadings and Eigen values. There were no statistically significant differences in the factor scores between attendees and non-attendees. There were significant associations between factor scores and other attributes of the surveyed population, including associations with occupation, transportation type, and training for and practice of breast self-examination. Cronbach's alpha showed an acceptable internal consistency. Conclusion: Certain subpopulations are less likely than others to attend breast screening in Kenya. A survey measure of breast cancer knowledge and perceived barriers to screening shows promise for use in Kenya for characterizing clinical and community population beliefs, but needs adaptation for setting, language and culture.",
keywords = "Barriers to screening, Breast cancer, Kenya, Knowledge, Psychometric assessment",
author = "J. Wachira and A. Busakhala and F. Chite and V. Naanyu and J. Kisuya and G. Otieno and A. Keter and A. Mwangi and Thomas Inui",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1186/s12913-017-2058-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refining a questionnaire to assess breast cancer knowledge and barriers to screening in Kenya

T2 - Psychometric assessment of the BCAM

AU - Wachira, J.

AU - Busakhala, A.

AU - Chite, F.

AU - Naanyu, V.

AU - Kisuya, J.

AU - Otieno, G.

AU - Keter, A.

AU - Mwangi, A.

AU - Inui, Thomas

PY - 2017/2/3

Y1 - 2017/2/3

N2 - Background: Our study objective was to determine the validity and reliability of the breast module of a cancer awareness measure (BCAM) among adult women in western Kenya. Methods: The study was conducted between October and November 2012, following three breast cancer screening events. Purposive and systematic random sampling methods were used to identity 48 women for cognitive focus group discussions, and 1061 (594 who attended vs. 467 who did not attend screening events) for surveys, respectively. Face and psychometric validity of the BCAM survey was assessed using cognitive testing, factor analysis of survey data, and correlations. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results: Among survey participants, the overall median age was 34 (IQR: 26-44) years. Compared to those women who did not attend the screening events, women attendees were older (median: 35 vs. 32 years, p = 0.001) more often married (79% vs. 72%, p = 0.006), more educated (52% vs. 46% with more than an elementary level of education, p = 0.001), more unemployed (59% vs. 11%, p = 0.001), more likely to report doing breast self-examination (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.001) and more likely to report having felt a breast lump (16% vs. 7%, p = 0.001). For domain 1 on knowledge of breast cancer symptoms, one factor (three items) with Eigen value of 1.76 emerged for the group that did not attend screening, and 1.50 for the group that attended screening. For both groups two factors (factor 1 "internal influences" and factor 2 "external influences") emerged among domain 4 on barriers to screening, with varied item loadings and Eigen values. There were no statistically significant differences in the factor scores between attendees and non-attendees. There were significant associations between factor scores and other attributes of the surveyed population, including associations with occupation, transportation type, and training for and practice of breast self-examination. Cronbach's alpha showed an acceptable internal consistency. Conclusion: Certain subpopulations are less likely than others to attend breast screening in Kenya. A survey measure of breast cancer knowledge and perceived barriers to screening shows promise for use in Kenya for characterizing clinical and community population beliefs, but needs adaptation for setting, language and culture.

AB - Background: Our study objective was to determine the validity and reliability of the breast module of a cancer awareness measure (BCAM) among adult women in western Kenya. Methods: The study was conducted between October and November 2012, following three breast cancer screening events. Purposive and systematic random sampling methods were used to identity 48 women for cognitive focus group discussions, and 1061 (594 who attended vs. 467 who did not attend screening events) for surveys, respectively. Face and psychometric validity of the BCAM survey was assessed using cognitive testing, factor analysis of survey data, and correlations. Internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Results: Among survey participants, the overall median age was 34 (IQR: 26-44) years. Compared to those women who did not attend the screening events, women attendees were older (median: 35 vs. 32 years, p = 0.001) more often married (79% vs. 72%, p = 0.006), more educated (52% vs. 46% with more than an elementary level of education, p = 0.001), more unemployed (59% vs. 11%, p = 0.001), more likely to report doing breast self-examination (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.001) and more likely to report having felt a breast lump (16% vs. 7%, p = 0.001). For domain 1 on knowledge of breast cancer symptoms, one factor (three items) with Eigen value of 1.76 emerged for the group that did not attend screening, and 1.50 for the group that attended screening. For both groups two factors (factor 1 "internal influences" and factor 2 "external influences") emerged among domain 4 on barriers to screening, with varied item loadings and Eigen values. There were no statistically significant differences in the factor scores between attendees and non-attendees. There were significant associations between factor scores and other attributes of the surveyed population, including associations with occupation, transportation type, and training for and practice of breast self-examination. Cronbach's alpha showed an acceptable internal consistency. Conclusion: Certain subpopulations are less likely than others to attend breast screening in Kenya. A survey measure of breast cancer knowledge and perceived barriers to screening shows promise for use in Kenya for characterizing clinical and community population beliefs, but needs adaptation for setting, language and culture.

KW - Barriers to screening

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Kenya

KW - Knowledge

KW - Psychometric assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011369897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011369897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12913-017-2058-x

DO - 10.1186/s12913-017-2058-x

M3 - Article

VL - 17

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 1

M1 - 110

ER -