Relation of the intraoperative defibrillation threshold to successful postoperative defibrillation with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Francis E. Marchlinski, Belinda Flores, John Miller, Charles D. Gottlieb, W. Clark Hargrove

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine the relation between the intraoperative defibrillation threshold and successful postoperative termination of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) with the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD), 33 patients who underwent AICD implantation were studied. The defibrillation threshold, determined after at least 10 seconds of VF, was 5 J in 2, 10 J in 6, 15 J in 10, 20 J in 10 and 25 J in 5 patients. The AICD energy rating on the first discharge was 28 ± 1.8 J. Defibrillation of induced VF was demonstrated postoperatively in 29 of 33 (88%) patients. The AICD terminated VF postoperatively in all 18 patients with a defibrillation threshold ≤ 15 J. Only 11 of the 15 (73%) patients with a defibrillation threshold ≥ 20 J (p <0.04) had VF terminated postoperatively. In all 4 patients in whom the AICD failed to terminate induced VF, the energy difference between the AICD rating and the defibrillation threshold was ≤ 10 J. Among the 14 patients with a difference of ≤ 10 J between the AICD energy rating and the defibrillation threshold, there were no significant differences between the 4 patients with and the 10 without successful VF termination with respect to the duration of VF induced postoperatively or the AICD lead system. In summary, failure to terminate VF with the AICD is not uncommon (27%) when the defibrillation threshold approaches the energy delivering capacity of the AICD. A margin of >10 J between the AICD energy rating and the defibrillation threshold should be sought by modifying lead type, size and position or by selecting the appropriate energy rating of the AICD device.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)393-398
Number of pages6
JournalThe American Journal of Cardiology
Volume62
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Ventricular Fibrillation
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Relation of the intraoperative defibrillation threshold to successful postoperative defibrillation with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator. / Marchlinski, Francis E.; Flores, Belinda; Miller, John; Gottlieb, Charles D.; Hargrove, W. Clark.

In: The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 62, No. 7, 01.09.1988, p. 393-398.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3942dac3cc284a61be5a35114980ca13,
title = "Relation of the intraoperative defibrillation threshold to successful postoperative defibrillation with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator",
abstract = "To determine the relation between the intraoperative defibrillation threshold and successful postoperative termination of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) with the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD), 33 patients who underwent AICD implantation were studied. The defibrillation threshold, determined after at least 10 seconds of VF, was 5 J in 2, 10 J in 6, 15 J in 10, 20 J in 10 and 25 J in 5 patients. The AICD energy rating on the first discharge was 28 ± 1.8 J. Defibrillation of induced VF was demonstrated postoperatively in 29 of 33 (88{\%}) patients. The AICD terminated VF postoperatively in all 18 patients with a defibrillation threshold ≤ 15 J. Only 11 of the 15 (73{\%}) patients with a defibrillation threshold ≥ 20 J (p <0.04) had VF terminated postoperatively. In all 4 patients in whom the AICD failed to terminate induced VF, the energy difference between the AICD rating and the defibrillation threshold was ≤ 10 J. Among the 14 patients with a difference of ≤ 10 J between the AICD energy rating and the defibrillation threshold, there were no significant differences between the 4 patients with and the 10 without successful VF termination with respect to the duration of VF induced postoperatively or the AICD lead system. In summary, failure to terminate VF with the AICD is not uncommon (27{\%}) when the defibrillation threshold approaches the energy delivering capacity of the AICD. A margin of >10 J between the AICD energy rating and the defibrillation threshold should be sought by modifying lead type, size and position or by selecting the appropriate energy rating of the AICD device.",
author = "Marchlinski, {Francis E.} and Belinda Flores and John Miller and Gottlieb, {Charles D.} and Hargrove, {W. Clark}",
year = "1988",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9149(88)90965-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "393--398",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relation of the intraoperative defibrillation threshold to successful postoperative defibrillation with an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator

AU - Marchlinski, Francis E.

AU - Flores, Belinda

AU - Miller, John

AU - Gottlieb, Charles D.

AU - Hargrove, W. Clark

PY - 1988/9/1

Y1 - 1988/9/1

N2 - To determine the relation between the intraoperative defibrillation threshold and successful postoperative termination of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) with the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD), 33 patients who underwent AICD implantation were studied. The defibrillation threshold, determined after at least 10 seconds of VF, was 5 J in 2, 10 J in 6, 15 J in 10, 20 J in 10 and 25 J in 5 patients. The AICD energy rating on the first discharge was 28 ± 1.8 J. Defibrillation of induced VF was demonstrated postoperatively in 29 of 33 (88%) patients. The AICD terminated VF postoperatively in all 18 patients with a defibrillation threshold ≤ 15 J. Only 11 of the 15 (73%) patients with a defibrillation threshold ≥ 20 J (p <0.04) had VF terminated postoperatively. In all 4 patients in whom the AICD failed to terminate induced VF, the energy difference between the AICD rating and the defibrillation threshold was ≤ 10 J. Among the 14 patients with a difference of ≤ 10 J between the AICD energy rating and the defibrillation threshold, there were no significant differences between the 4 patients with and the 10 without successful VF termination with respect to the duration of VF induced postoperatively or the AICD lead system. In summary, failure to terminate VF with the AICD is not uncommon (27%) when the defibrillation threshold approaches the energy delivering capacity of the AICD. A margin of >10 J between the AICD energy rating and the defibrillation threshold should be sought by modifying lead type, size and position or by selecting the appropriate energy rating of the AICD device.

AB - To determine the relation between the intraoperative defibrillation threshold and successful postoperative termination of induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) with the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD), 33 patients who underwent AICD implantation were studied. The defibrillation threshold, determined after at least 10 seconds of VF, was 5 J in 2, 10 J in 6, 15 J in 10, 20 J in 10 and 25 J in 5 patients. The AICD energy rating on the first discharge was 28 ± 1.8 J. Defibrillation of induced VF was demonstrated postoperatively in 29 of 33 (88%) patients. The AICD terminated VF postoperatively in all 18 patients with a defibrillation threshold ≤ 15 J. Only 11 of the 15 (73%) patients with a defibrillation threshold ≥ 20 J (p <0.04) had VF terminated postoperatively. In all 4 patients in whom the AICD failed to terminate induced VF, the energy difference between the AICD rating and the defibrillation threshold was ≤ 10 J. Among the 14 patients with a difference of ≤ 10 J between the AICD energy rating and the defibrillation threshold, there were no significant differences between the 4 patients with and the 10 without successful VF termination with respect to the duration of VF induced postoperatively or the AICD lead system. In summary, failure to terminate VF with the AICD is not uncommon (27%) when the defibrillation threshold approaches the energy delivering capacity of the AICD. A margin of >10 J between the AICD energy rating and the defibrillation threshold should be sought by modifying lead type, size and position or by selecting the appropriate energy rating of the AICD device.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023786718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023786718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90965-4

DO - 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90965-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 3414516

AN - SCOPUS:0023786718

VL - 62

SP - 393

EP - 398

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 7

ER -