Relations among clinical scales in schizophrenia

Raquel E. Gur, P. David Mozley, Susan M. Resnick, Stephen Levick, Roland Erwin, Andrew Saykin, Ruben C. Gur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

140 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Clinical scales have become established as tools to quantify phenomenological features of schizophrenia. The goal of this study was to examine relations among the following: the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and the aeficit-nonaeficit classification. Method: Forty-seven patients with schizophrenia were recruited according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The standardized assessment procedures were administered by a trained psychiatric research team. Results: Examination of the BPRS showed that the patients had highest scores on the thought disorder factor and the symptoms specific to schizophrenia. Classification of patients as having the positive, negative, or mixed type of schizophrenia resulted in a finding of seven with the positive, seven with the negative, and 33 with the mixed type. The division of patients into those with the deficit syndrome (N=29) and those without (N=18) was related to symptom specificity and to positive and negative symptoms. Deficit syndrome patients had more symptoms specific to schizophrenia, fewer nonspecific symptoms, and, as expected, greater severity of negative symptoms. Cluster analysis revealed three clusters of patients: those with low negative symptom scores and high scores on specific symptoms (the majority were without the deficit syndrome); those with high scores on negative, positive, and specific symptoms (the majority had the deficit syndrome); and those with lower scores on specific symptoms and high scores on negative and positive symptoms (the majority had the deficit syndrome). Conclusions: The scales showed some overlap but also seemed to measure complementary aspects of the phenomenology of schizophrenia. Subtypes of patients identified by the combined use of these scales may differ in underlying pathology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)472-478
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume148
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Schizophrenia
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale
Symptom Assessment
Cluster Analysis
Psychiatry
Pathology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Gur, R. E., Mozley, P. D., Resnick, S. M., Levick, S., Erwin, R., Saykin, A., & Gur, R. C. (1991). Relations among clinical scales in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(4), 472-478.

Relations among clinical scales in schizophrenia. / Gur, Raquel E.; Mozley, P. David; Resnick, Susan M.; Levick, Stephen; Erwin, Roland; Saykin, Andrew; Gur, Ruben C.

In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 148, No. 4, 04.1991, p. 472-478.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gur, RE, Mozley, PD, Resnick, SM, Levick, S, Erwin, R, Saykin, A & Gur, RC 1991, 'Relations among clinical scales in schizophrenia', American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 472-478.
Gur RE, Mozley PD, Resnick SM, Levick S, Erwin R, Saykin A et al. Relations among clinical scales in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1991 Apr;148(4):472-478.
Gur, Raquel E. ; Mozley, P. David ; Resnick, Susan M. ; Levick, Stephen ; Erwin, Roland ; Saykin, Andrew ; Gur, Ruben C. / Relations among clinical scales in schizophrenia. In: American Journal of Psychiatry. 1991 ; Vol. 148, No. 4. pp. 472-478.
@article{39c018590ea34912b6827f91c1f4f686,
title = "Relations among clinical scales in schizophrenia",
abstract = "Objective: Clinical scales have become established as tools to quantify phenomenological features of schizophrenia. The goal of this study was to examine relations among the following: the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and the aeficit-nonaeficit classification. Method: Forty-seven patients with schizophrenia were recruited according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The standardized assessment procedures were administered by a trained psychiatric research team. Results: Examination of the BPRS showed that the patients had highest scores on the thought disorder factor and the symptoms specific to schizophrenia. Classification of patients as having the positive, negative, or mixed type of schizophrenia resulted in a finding of seven with the positive, seven with the negative, and 33 with the mixed type. The division of patients into those with the deficit syndrome (N=29) and those without (N=18) was related to symptom specificity and to positive and negative symptoms. Deficit syndrome patients had more symptoms specific to schizophrenia, fewer nonspecific symptoms, and, as expected, greater severity of negative symptoms. Cluster analysis revealed three clusters of patients: those with low negative symptom scores and high scores on specific symptoms (the majority were without the deficit syndrome); those with high scores on negative, positive, and specific symptoms (the majority had the deficit syndrome); and those with lower scores on specific symptoms and high scores on negative and positive symptoms (the majority had the deficit syndrome). Conclusions: The scales showed some overlap but also seemed to measure complementary aspects of the phenomenology of schizophrenia. Subtypes of patients identified by the combined use of these scales may differ in underlying pathology.",
author = "Gur, {Raquel E.} and Mozley, {P. David} and Resnick, {Susan M.} and Stephen Levick and Roland Erwin and Andrew Saykin and Gur, {Ruben C.}",
year = "1991",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "472--478",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relations among clinical scales in schizophrenia

AU - Gur, Raquel E.

AU - Mozley, P. David

AU - Resnick, Susan M.

AU - Levick, Stephen

AU - Erwin, Roland

AU - Saykin, Andrew

AU - Gur, Ruben C.

PY - 1991/4

Y1 - 1991/4

N2 - Objective: Clinical scales have become established as tools to quantify phenomenological features of schizophrenia. The goal of this study was to examine relations among the following: the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and the aeficit-nonaeficit classification. Method: Forty-seven patients with schizophrenia were recruited according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The standardized assessment procedures were administered by a trained psychiatric research team. Results: Examination of the BPRS showed that the patients had highest scores on the thought disorder factor and the symptoms specific to schizophrenia. Classification of patients as having the positive, negative, or mixed type of schizophrenia resulted in a finding of seven with the positive, seven with the negative, and 33 with the mixed type. The division of patients into those with the deficit syndrome (N=29) and those without (N=18) was related to symptom specificity and to positive and negative symptoms. Deficit syndrome patients had more symptoms specific to schizophrenia, fewer nonspecific symptoms, and, as expected, greater severity of negative symptoms. Cluster analysis revealed three clusters of patients: those with low negative symptom scores and high scores on specific symptoms (the majority were without the deficit syndrome); those with high scores on negative, positive, and specific symptoms (the majority had the deficit syndrome); and those with lower scores on specific symptoms and high scores on negative and positive symptoms (the majority had the deficit syndrome). Conclusions: The scales showed some overlap but also seemed to measure complementary aspects of the phenomenology of schizophrenia. Subtypes of patients identified by the combined use of these scales may differ in underlying pathology.

AB - Objective: Clinical scales have become established as tools to quantify phenomenological features of schizophrenia. The goal of this study was to examine relations among the following: the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and the aeficit-nonaeficit classification. Method: Forty-seven patients with schizophrenia were recruited according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The standardized assessment procedures were administered by a trained psychiatric research team. Results: Examination of the BPRS showed that the patients had highest scores on the thought disorder factor and the symptoms specific to schizophrenia. Classification of patients as having the positive, negative, or mixed type of schizophrenia resulted in a finding of seven with the positive, seven with the negative, and 33 with the mixed type. The division of patients into those with the deficit syndrome (N=29) and those without (N=18) was related to symptom specificity and to positive and negative symptoms. Deficit syndrome patients had more symptoms specific to schizophrenia, fewer nonspecific symptoms, and, as expected, greater severity of negative symptoms. Cluster analysis revealed three clusters of patients: those with low negative symptom scores and high scores on specific symptoms (the majority were without the deficit syndrome); those with high scores on negative, positive, and specific symptoms (the majority had the deficit syndrome); and those with lower scores on specific symptoms and high scores on negative and positive symptoms (the majority had the deficit syndrome). Conclusions: The scales showed some overlap but also seemed to measure complementary aspects of the phenomenology of schizophrenia. Subtypes of patients identified by the combined use of these scales may differ in underlying pathology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025963326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025963326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 148

SP - 472

EP - 478

JO - American Journal of Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 4

ER -