Reliability and validity of a tool to assess oncology nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication

Amy R. Newman, Paul Helft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To establish the reliability and validity of a previously developed survey measuring nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication.

DESIGN: Psychometric testing of survey.

SETTING: Mailed survey of Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) members.

SAMPLE: 392 ONS members.

METHODS: Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Total scale and subscale characteristics were evaluated through inter-item correlation matrices, average inter-item correlations, corrected item-to-total correlations, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients if the items were removed. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis and contrasted group comparisons.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Measures of attitudes toward prognosis-related communication, demographic variables.

FINDINGS: A three-factor structure emerged with acceptable reliability and validity. Contrasted group comparisons revealed differences in prognosis-related communication by nurses' years of experience with patients with cancer, level of education, and extent of education about prognosis-related communication.

CONCLUSIONS: The final three-factor instrument, Prognosis-Related Communication in Oncology Nursing, was found to have acceptable reliability and validity.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The final instrument can serve as a tool to measure nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication. Such measurements may guide interventions that aim to improve the process of prognostic disclosure and elucidate the role of the nurse in the process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-73
Number of pages10
JournalOncology Nursing Forum
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Nurses
Communication
Oncology Nursing
Nursing Societies
Education
Nurse's Role
Disclosure
Psychometrics
Statistical Factor Analysis
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • communication
  • disclosure
  • nurses' experiences
  • prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Reliability and validity of a tool to assess oncology nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication. / Newman, Amy R.; Helft, Paul.

In: Oncology Nursing Forum, Vol. 42, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 64-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{680fe95da651427fabf0945f60a04db1,
title = "Reliability and validity of a tool to assess oncology nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication",
abstract = "PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To establish the reliability and validity of a previously developed survey measuring nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication.DESIGN: Psychometric testing of survey.SETTING: Mailed survey of Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) members.SAMPLE: 392 ONS members.METHODS: Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Total scale and subscale characteristics were evaluated through inter-item correlation matrices, average inter-item correlations, corrected item-to-total correlations, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients if the items were removed. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis and contrasted group comparisons.MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Measures of attitudes toward prognosis-related communication, demographic variables.FINDINGS: A three-factor structure emerged with acceptable reliability and validity. Contrasted group comparisons revealed differences in prognosis-related communication by nurses' years of experience with patients with cancer, level of education, and extent of education about prognosis-related communication.CONCLUSIONS: The final three-factor instrument, Prognosis-Related Communication in Oncology Nursing, was found to have acceptable reliability and validity.IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The final instrument can serve as a tool to measure nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication. Such measurements may guide interventions that aim to improve the process of prognostic disclosure and elucidate the role of the nurse in the process.",
keywords = "communication, disclosure, nurses' experiences, prognosis",
author = "Newman, {Amy R.} and Paul Helft",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1188/15.ONF.64-73",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "64--73",
journal = "Oncology Nursing Forum",
issn = "1538-0688",
publisher = "Oncology Nursing Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and validity of a tool to assess oncology nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication

AU - Newman, Amy R.

AU - Helft, Paul

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To establish the reliability and validity of a previously developed survey measuring nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication.DESIGN: Psychometric testing of survey.SETTING: Mailed survey of Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) members.SAMPLE: 392 ONS members.METHODS: Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Total scale and subscale characteristics were evaluated through inter-item correlation matrices, average inter-item correlations, corrected item-to-total correlations, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients if the items were removed. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis and contrasted group comparisons.MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Measures of attitudes toward prognosis-related communication, demographic variables.FINDINGS: A three-factor structure emerged with acceptable reliability and validity. Contrasted group comparisons revealed differences in prognosis-related communication by nurses' years of experience with patients with cancer, level of education, and extent of education about prognosis-related communication.CONCLUSIONS: The final three-factor instrument, Prognosis-Related Communication in Oncology Nursing, was found to have acceptable reliability and validity.IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The final instrument can serve as a tool to measure nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication. Such measurements may guide interventions that aim to improve the process of prognostic disclosure and elucidate the role of the nurse in the process.

AB - PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To establish the reliability and validity of a previously developed survey measuring nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication.DESIGN: Psychometric testing of survey.SETTING: Mailed survey of Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) members.SAMPLE: 392 ONS members.METHODS: Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha. Total scale and subscale characteristics were evaluated through inter-item correlation matrices, average inter-item correlations, corrected item-to-total correlations, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients if the items were removed. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis and contrasted group comparisons.MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Measures of attitudes toward prognosis-related communication, demographic variables.FINDINGS: A three-factor structure emerged with acceptable reliability and validity. Contrasted group comparisons revealed differences in prognosis-related communication by nurses' years of experience with patients with cancer, level of education, and extent of education about prognosis-related communication.CONCLUSIONS: The final three-factor instrument, Prognosis-Related Communication in Oncology Nursing, was found to have acceptable reliability and validity.IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The final instrument can serve as a tool to measure nurses' experiences with prognosis-related communication. Such measurements may guide interventions that aim to improve the process of prognostic disclosure and elucidate the role of the nurse in the process.

KW - communication

KW - disclosure

KW - nurses' experiences

KW - prognosis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937512087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937512087&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1188/15.ONF.64-73

DO - 10.1188/15.ONF.64-73

M3 - Article

C2 - 25542322

AN - SCOPUS:84937512087

VL - 42

SP - 64

EP - 73

JO - Oncology Nursing Forum

JF - Oncology Nursing Forum

SN - 1538-0688

IS - 1

ER -