Reliability of adolescents' reports of height and weight

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to compare adolescents' self-reports of height and weight with measured height and weight to assess possible bias in self-report. The study was designed to be a cross-sectional, clinical study in a primary care Adolescent Medicine Clinic in an urban teaching hospital. The subjects were 725 consecutive patients aged 14-20 years (564 females, 161 males) with initial visite during a 2-month period. Our results showed that height was overreported by 0.5 cm and 0.6 cm by females and males, respectively. Weight was underreported by 1.5 and 1.2 kg by females and males, respectively. Differences in height or weight reports were not due to subjects' age. Females and males in the heaviest quartiles of measured weight underreported weight by significantly more than those in lighter quartiles. There were no differences in the accuracy of height or weight reports when subjects were grouped by height quartile. in conclusion, adolescents' self-reports of weight are particularly likely to differ from measured values, and these differences are largest for heavier individuals. This bias In self-report could affect results of clinical and survey research using self-report. The magnitude of such an effect would likely be small.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)114-117
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1992

Fingerprint

Weights and Measures
Self Report
Adolescent Medicine
Urban Hospitals
Teaching Hospitals
Primary Health Care
Cross-Sectional Studies
Research

Keywords

  • Self-reports Height Weight

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Reliability of adolescents' reports of height and weight. / Fortenberry, J. Dennis.

In: Journal of Adolescent Health, Vol. 13, No. 2, 03.1992, p. 114-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ffe42e431ea406cbe822994812ecb4c,
title = "Reliability of adolescents' reports of height and weight",
abstract = "The purpose of our study was to compare adolescents' self-reports of height and weight with measured height and weight to assess possible bias in self-report. The study was designed to be a cross-sectional, clinical study in a primary care Adolescent Medicine Clinic in an urban teaching hospital. The subjects were 725 consecutive patients aged 14-20 years (564 females, 161 males) with initial visite during a 2-month period. Our results showed that height was overreported by 0.5 cm and 0.6 cm by females and males, respectively. Weight was underreported by 1.5 and 1.2 kg by females and males, respectively. Differences in height or weight reports were not due to subjects' age. Females and males in the heaviest quartiles of measured weight underreported weight by significantly more than those in lighter quartiles. There were no differences in the accuracy of height or weight reports when subjects were grouped by height quartile. in conclusion, adolescents' self-reports of weight are particularly likely to differ from measured values, and these differences are largest for heavier individuals. This bias In self-report could affect results of clinical and survey research using self-report. The magnitude of such an effect would likely be small.",
keywords = "Self-reports Height Weight",
author = "Fortenberry, {J. Dennis}",
year = "1992",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/1054-139X(92)90076-N",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "114--117",
journal = "Journal of Adolescent Health",
issn = "1054-139X",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of adolescents' reports of height and weight

AU - Fortenberry, J. Dennis

PY - 1992/3

Y1 - 1992/3

N2 - The purpose of our study was to compare adolescents' self-reports of height and weight with measured height and weight to assess possible bias in self-report. The study was designed to be a cross-sectional, clinical study in a primary care Adolescent Medicine Clinic in an urban teaching hospital. The subjects were 725 consecutive patients aged 14-20 years (564 females, 161 males) with initial visite during a 2-month period. Our results showed that height was overreported by 0.5 cm and 0.6 cm by females and males, respectively. Weight was underreported by 1.5 and 1.2 kg by females and males, respectively. Differences in height or weight reports were not due to subjects' age. Females and males in the heaviest quartiles of measured weight underreported weight by significantly more than those in lighter quartiles. There were no differences in the accuracy of height or weight reports when subjects were grouped by height quartile. in conclusion, adolescents' self-reports of weight are particularly likely to differ from measured values, and these differences are largest for heavier individuals. This bias In self-report could affect results of clinical and survey research using self-report. The magnitude of such an effect would likely be small.

AB - The purpose of our study was to compare adolescents' self-reports of height and weight with measured height and weight to assess possible bias in self-report. The study was designed to be a cross-sectional, clinical study in a primary care Adolescent Medicine Clinic in an urban teaching hospital. The subjects were 725 consecutive patients aged 14-20 years (564 females, 161 males) with initial visite during a 2-month period. Our results showed that height was overreported by 0.5 cm and 0.6 cm by females and males, respectively. Weight was underreported by 1.5 and 1.2 kg by females and males, respectively. Differences in height or weight reports were not due to subjects' age. Females and males in the heaviest quartiles of measured weight underreported weight by significantly more than those in lighter quartiles. There were no differences in the accuracy of height or weight reports when subjects were grouped by height quartile. in conclusion, adolescents' self-reports of weight are particularly likely to differ from measured values, and these differences are largest for heavier individuals. This bias In self-report could affect results of clinical and survey research using self-report. The magnitude of such an effect would likely be small.

KW - Self-reports Height Weight

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026580851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026580851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/1054-139X(92)90076-N

DO - 10.1016/1054-139X(92)90076-N

M3 - Article

C2 - 1627577

AN - SCOPUS:0026580851

VL - 13

SP - 114

EP - 117

JO - Journal of Adolescent Health

JF - Journal of Adolescent Health

SN - 1054-139X

IS - 2

ER -