Reliability of AIDS knowledge scales: Conceptual issues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

A common approach to evaluating the reliability of AIDS knowledge scales has relied on the demonstration of internal consistency through the use of Kuder-Richardson formula 20 (KR-20) or coefficient alpha. In this study, the argument was made that, in a knowledge-based scale with diverse content (exemplified by AIDS knowledge scales), internal consistency does not make sense conceptually and underestimates the scale's true reliability. It was therefore hypothesized that a split-half approach, in which items in each half were matched for content, would provide superior estimates of reliability when compared to either KR-20 or an odd-even split-half approach. Reliability analyses performed on a knowledge scale developed by the author supported this hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)338-344
Number of pages7
JournalAIDS Education and Prevention
Volume4
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 1992
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of AIDS knowledge scales: Conceptual issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this