Reply to "comment on 'Lack of evidence for a superdeformed band in '192"

A. J.M. Plompen, M. N. Harakeh, W. H.A. Hesselink, G. Van 'T Hof, N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, J. P.S. Van Schagen, R. V.F. Janssens, I. Ahmad, I. G. Bearden, M. P. Carpenter, T. L. Khoo, T. Lauritsen, Y. Liang, U. Garg, W. Reviol, D. Ye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

In reply to the preceding Comment, we wish to stress that lack of consistency between experiments of similar quality justifies our claim that further searches for a superdeformed band in Pb192 with more powerful instruments are called for. We believe that the main results presented in the Comment support this conclusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalPhysical Review C
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Cite this

Plompen, A. J. M., Harakeh, M. N., Hesselink, W. H. A., Van 'T Hof, G., Kalantar-Nayestanaki, N., Van Schagen, J. P. S., Janssens, R. V. F., Ahmad, I., Bearden, I. G., Carpenter, M. P., Khoo, T. L., Lauritsen, T., Liang, Y., Garg, U., Reviol, W., & Ye, D. (1994). Reply to "comment on 'Lack of evidence for a superdeformed band in '192". Physical Review C, 49(5). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.49.2851