Reproducibility of the villous component and high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas <1 cm

Implications for endoscopic surveillance

Dipti Mahajan, Erinn Downs-Kelly, Xiuli Liu, Rish K. Pai, Deepa T. Patil, Lisa Rybicki, Ana E. Bennett, Thomas Plesec, Oscar Cummings, Douglas Rex, John R. Goldblum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or villous component (VC) defines an advanced adenoma (AA) in patients with 1 or 2 adenomas <1 cm in size. Current consensus guidelines recommend that patients with AA undergo more intense postpolypectomy surveillance. In these clinical situations, the interobserver reliability in determining VC and HGD would play a major role in the credibility of these consensus guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability of VC and HGD in polyps <1 cm before and after the development of consensus criteria among gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists. Five GI pathologists independently evaluated 107 colorectal adenomas <1 cm, and classified them into tubular adenomas or adenomas with a VC (A-VC) and into low-grade dysplasia or HGD. Then a consensus conference was held and consensus criteria for VC and HGD were developed by group review. The same set of 107 slides were rereviewed independently by the same 5 GI pathologists. Interobserver variability using κ statistical analysis before and after the application of consensus criteria was assessed. A 1-sided z-test was used to determine whether κ scores increased after the consensus conference. Interobserver agreement before and after the consensus conference was poor for assessment of A-VC, HGD, and AA. These data calls into question the validity of basing clinical decisions on this distinction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-433
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2013

Fingerprint

Adenoma
Consensus
Observer Variation
Guidelines
Polyps
Pathologists

Keywords

  • adenoma
  • advanced adenoma
  • High-grade dysplasia
  • villous component

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Reproducibility of the villous component and high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas <1 cm : Implications for endoscopic surveillance. / Mahajan, Dipti; Downs-Kelly, Erinn; Liu, Xiuli; Pai, Rish K.; Patil, Deepa T.; Rybicki, Lisa; Bennett, Ana E.; Plesec, Thomas; Cummings, Oscar; Rex, Douglas; Goldblum, John R.

In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Vol. 37, No. 3, 03.2013, p. 427-433.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mahajan, D, Downs-Kelly, E, Liu, X, Pai, RK, Patil, DT, Rybicki, L, Bennett, AE, Plesec, T, Cummings, O, Rex, D & Goldblum, JR 2013, 'Reproducibility of the villous component and high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas <1 cm: Implications for endoscopic surveillance', American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 427-433. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826cf50f
Mahajan, Dipti ; Downs-Kelly, Erinn ; Liu, Xiuli ; Pai, Rish K. ; Patil, Deepa T. ; Rybicki, Lisa ; Bennett, Ana E. ; Plesec, Thomas ; Cummings, Oscar ; Rex, Douglas ; Goldblum, John R. / Reproducibility of the villous component and high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas <1 cm : Implications for endoscopic surveillance. In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2013 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 427-433.
@article{a47ac2e2e0914bca9c37556ea18d2498,
title = "Reproducibility of the villous component and high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas <1 cm: Implications for endoscopic surveillance",
abstract = "The presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or villous component (VC) defines an advanced adenoma (AA) in patients with 1 or 2 adenomas <1 cm in size. Current consensus guidelines recommend that patients with AA undergo more intense postpolypectomy surveillance. In these clinical situations, the interobserver reliability in determining VC and HGD would play a major role in the credibility of these consensus guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability of VC and HGD in polyps <1 cm before and after the development of consensus criteria among gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists. Five GI pathologists independently evaluated 107 colorectal adenomas <1 cm, and classified them into tubular adenomas or adenomas with a VC (A-VC) and into low-grade dysplasia or HGD. Then a consensus conference was held and consensus criteria for VC and HGD were developed by group review. The same set of 107 slides were rereviewed independently by the same 5 GI pathologists. Interobserver variability using κ statistical analysis before and after the application of consensus criteria was assessed. A 1-sided z-test was used to determine whether κ scores increased after the consensus conference. Interobserver agreement before and after the consensus conference was poor for assessment of A-VC, HGD, and AA. These data calls into question the validity of basing clinical decisions on this distinction.",
keywords = "adenoma, advanced adenoma, High-grade dysplasia, villous component",
author = "Dipti Mahajan and Erinn Downs-Kelly and Xiuli Liu and Pai, {Rish K.} and Patil, {Deepa T.} and Lisa Rybicki and Bennett, {Ana E.} and Thomas Plesec and Oscar Cummings and Douglas Rex and Goldblum, {John R.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826cf50f",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "427--433",
journal = "American Journal of Surgical Pathology",
issn = "0147-5185",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of the villous component and high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas <1 cm

T2 - Implications for endoscopic surveillance

AU - Mahajan, Dipti

AU - Downs-Kelly, Erinn

AU - Liu, Xiuli

AU - Pai, Rish K.

AU - Patil, Deepa T.

AU - Rybicki, Lisa

AU - Bennett, Ana E.

AU - Plesec, Thomas

AU - Cummings, Oscar

AU - Rex, Douglas

AU - Goldblum, John R.

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - The presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or villous component (VC) defines an advanced adenoma (AA) in patients with 1 or 2 adenomas <1 cm in size. Current consensus guidelines recommend that patients with AA undergo more intense postpolypectomy surveillance. In these clinical situations, the interobserver reliability in determining VC and HGD would play a major role in the credibility of these consensus guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability of VC and HGD in polyps <1 cm before and after the development of consensus criteria among gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists. Five GI pathologists independently evaluated 107 colorectal adenomas <1 cm, and classified them into tubular adenomas or adenomas with a VC (A-VC) and into low-grade dysplasia or HGD. Then a consensus conference was held and consensus criteria for VC and HGD were developed by group review. The same set of 107 slides were rereviewed independently by the same 5 GI pathologists. Interobserver variability using κ statistical analysis before and after the application of consensus criteria was assessed. A 1-sided z-test was used to determine whether κ scores increased after the consensus conference. Interobserver agreement before and after the consensus conference was poor for assessment of A-VC, HGD, and AA. These data calls into question the validity of basing clinical decisions on this distinction.

AB - The presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or villous component (VC) defines an advanced adenoma (AA) in patients with 1 or 2 adenomas <1 cm in size. Current consensus guidelines recommend that patients with AA undergo more intense postpolypectomy surveillance. In these clinical situations, the interobserver reliability in determining VC and HGD would play a major role in the credibility of these consensus guidelines. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability of VC and HGD in polyps <1 cm before and after the development of consensus criteria among gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists. Five GI pathologists independently evaluated 107 colorectal adenomas <1 cm, and classified them into tubular adenomas or adenomas with a VC (A-VC) and into low-grade dysplasia or HGD. Then a consensus conference was held and consensus criteria for VC and HGD were developed by group review. The same set of 107 slides were rereviewed independently by the same 5 GI pathologists. Interobserver variability using κ statistical analysis before and after the application of consensus criteria was assessed. A 1-sided z-test was used to determine whether κ scores increased after the consensus conference. Interobserver agreement before and after the consensus conference was poor for assessment of A-VC, HGD, and AA. These data calls into question the validity of basing clinical decisions on this distinction.

KW - adenoma

KW - advanced adenoma

KW - High-grade dysplasia

KW - villous component

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873992017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873992017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826cf50f

DO - 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31826cf50f

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 427

EP - 433

JO - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

SN - 0147-5185

IS - 3

ER -