Research ethics in the era of personalized medicine

Updating science's contract with society

Eric M. Meslin, Mildred K. Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the completed sequence of the human genome has come the prospect of substantially improving the quality of life for millions through personalized medicine approaches. Still, any advances in this direction require research involving human subjects. For decades science and ethics have enjoyed an allegiance reflected in a common set of ethical principles and procedures guiding the conduct of research with human subjects. Some of these principles emphasize avoiding harm over maximizing benefit. In this paper we revisit the priority given to these ethical principles - particularly the principles that support a cautious approach to science - and propose a reframing of the 'social contract' between science and society that emphasizes reciprocity and meeting public needs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)378-384
Number of pages7
JournalPublic Health Genomics
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

Research Ethics
Precision Medicine
Contracts
Human Genome
Research
Ethics
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • Personalized medicine
  • Research ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Research ethics in the era of personalized medicine : Updating science's contract with society. / Meslin, Eric M.; Cho, Mildred K.

In: Public Health Genomics, Vol. 13, No. 6, 08.2010, p. 378-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meslin, Eric M. ; Cho, Mildred K. / Research ethics in the era of personalized medicine : Updating science's contract with society. In: Public Health Genomics. 2010 ; Vol. 13, No. 6. pp. 378-384.
@article{f58cd5eef012434488981ffe29d24e58,
title = "Research ethics in the era of personalized medicine: Updating science's contract with society",
abstract = "With the completed sequence of the human genome has come the prospect of substantially improving the quality of life for millions through personalized medicine approaches. Still, any advances in this direction require research involving human subjects. For decades science and ethics have enjoyed an allegiance reflected in a common set of ethical principles and procedures guiding the conduct of research with human subjects. Some of these principles emphasize avoiding harm over maximizing benefit. In this paper we revisit the priority given to these ethical principles - particularly the principles that support a cautious approach to science - and propose a reframing of the 'social contract' between science and society that emphasizes reciprocity and meeting public needs.",
keywords = "Personalized medicine, Research ethics",
author = "Meslin, {Eric M.} and Cho, {Mildred K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1159/000319473",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "378--384",
journal = "Public Health Genomics",
issn = "1662-4246",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research ethics in the era of personalized medicine

T2 - Updating science's contract with society

AU - Meslin, Eric M.

AU - Cho, Mildred K.

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - With the completed sequence of the human genome has come the prospect of substantially improving the quality of life for millions through personalized medicine approaches. Still, any advances in this direction require research involving human subjects. For decades science and ethics have enjoyed an allegiance reflected in a common set of ethical principles and procedures guiding the conduct of research with human subjects. Some of these principles emphasize avoiding harm over maximizing benefit. In this paper we revisit the priority given to these ethical principles - particularly the principles that support a cautious approach to science - and propose a reframing of the 'social contract' between science and society that emphasizes reciprocity and meeting public needs.

AB - With the completed sequence of the human genome has come the prospect of substantially improving the quality of life for millions through personalized medicine approaches. Still, any advances in this direction require research involving human subjects. For decades science and ethics have enjoyed an allegiance reflected in a common set of ethical principles and procedures guiding the conduct of research with human subjects. Some of these principles emphasize avoiding harm over maximizing benefit. In this paper we revisit the priority given to these ethical principles - particularly the principles that support a cautious approach to science - and propose a reframing of the 'social contract' between science and society that emphasizes reciprocity and meeting public needs.

KW - Personalized medicine

KW - Research ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956312960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956312960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000319473

DO - 10.1159/000319473

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 378

EP - 384

JO - Public Health Genomics

JF - Public Health Genomics

SN - 1662-4246

IS - 6

ER -