Research on the cognitively impaired: Lessons and warnings from the emergency research debate

Jason H T Karlawish, Greg Sachs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that the recent events in emergency research have broad implications for the conduct of human subjects research with the cognitively impaired. This essay illustrates the similarities between the two kinds of research and suggests how understanding these similarities might help to resolve issues in human subjects research on the cognitively impaired. METHODS: A review of pertinent journal articles, books, regulations, and court cases. RESULTS: The emergency research controversy resulted in large part because of conflicting interpretations of arguably inadequate research regulations. The proposed Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations include advance in formed consent, a broad role for family in approving a subject's participation, replacement of a threshold of permissible risk, called minimal risk, with a more sensible balancing of risks and benefits, and a role for the community in research approval. The current state of research on the cognitively impaired suggests that many of the same problems exist now that existed in emergency research before the FDA issued its proposed regulations. The ongoing case of T.D. et al. vs N.Y. State Office of Mental Health suggests that unless steps are taken similar to those taken in emergency research, much of clinical research on the cognitively impaired could cease. CONCLUSION: Representatives of the government, medicine, and the public must recognize the unresolved issues and inadequate regulations relating to research on the cognitively impaired. The proposed FDA regulations for emergency research may provide guidance for a settlement of these issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)474-481
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume45
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Emergencies
Research
United States Food and Drug Administration
Drug and Narcotic Control
Mental Health
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Research on the cognitively impaired : Lessons and warnings from the emergency research debate. / Karlawish, Jason H T; Sachs, Greg.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 45, No. 4, 04.1997, p. 474-481.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{79a9dbe56e1b4c91b3248ee7be93ff81,
title = "Research on the cognitively impaired: Lessons and warnings from the emergency research debate",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that the recent events in emergency research have broad implications for the conduct of human subjects research with the cognitively impaired. This essay illustrates the similarities between the two kinds of research and suggests how understanding these similarities might help to resolve issues in human subjects research on the cognitively impaired. METHODS: A review of pertinent journal articles, books, regulations, and court cases. RESULTS: The emergency research controversy resulted in large part because of conflicting interpretations of arguably inadequate research regulations. The proposed Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations include advance in formed consent, a broad role for family in approving a subject's participation, replacement of a threshold of permissible risk, called minimal risk, with a more sensible balancing of risks and benefits, and a role for the community in research approval. The current state of research on the cognitively impaired suggests that many of the same problems exist now that existed in emergency research before the FDA issued its proposed regulations. The ongoing case of T.D. et al. vs N.Y. State Office of Mental Health suggests that unless steps are taken similar to those taken in emergency research, much of clinical research on the cognitively impaired could cease. CONCLUSION: Representatives of the government, medicine, and the public must recognize the unresolved issues and inadequate regulations relating to research on the cognitively impaired. The proposed FDA regulations for emergency research may provide guidance for a settlement of these issues.",
author = "Karlawish, {Jason H T} and Greg Sachs",
year = "1997",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "474--481",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research on the cognitively impaired

T2 - Lessons and warnings from the emergency research debate

AU - Karlawish, Jason H T

AU - Sachs, Greg

PY - 1997/4

Y1 - 1997/4

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that the recent events in emergency research have broad implications for the conduct of human subjects research with the cognitively impaired. This essay illustrates the similarities between the two kinds of research and suggests how understanding these similarities might help to resolve issues in human subjects research on the cognitively impaired. METHODS: A review of pertinent journal articles, books, regulations, and court cases. RESULTS: The emergency research controversy resulted in large part because of conflicting interpretations of arguably inadequate research regulations. The proposed Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations include advance in formed consent, a broad role for family in approving a subject's participation, replacement of a threshold of permissible risk, called minimal risk, with a more sensible balancing of risks and benefits, and a role for the community in research approval. The current state of research on the cognitively impaired suggests that many of the same problems exist now that existed in emergency research before the FDA issued its proposed regulations. The ongoing case of T.D. et al. vs N.Y. State Office of Mental Health suggests that unless steps are taken similar to those taken in emergency research, much of clinical research on the cognitively impaired could cease. CONCLUSION: Representatives of the government, medicine, and the public must recognize the unresolved issues and inadequate regulations relating to research on the cognitively impaired. The proposed FDA regulations for emergency research may provide guidance for a settlement of these issues.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate that the recent events in emergency research have broad implications for the conduct of human subjects research with the cognitively impaired. This essay illustrates the similarities between the two kinds of research and suggests how understanding these similarities might help to resolve issues in human subjects research on the cognitively impaired. METHODS: A review of pertinent journal articles, books, regulations, and court cases. RESULTS: The emergency research controversy resulted in large part because of conflicting interpretations of arguably inadequate research regulations. The proposed Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations include advance in formed consent, a broad role for family in approving a subject's participation, replacement of a threshold of permissible risk, called minimal risk, with a more sensible balancing of risks and benefits, and a role for the community in research approval. The current state of research on the cognitively impaired suggests that many of the same problems exist now that existed in emergency research before the FDA issued its proposed regulations. The ongoing case of T.D. et al. vs N.Y. State Office of Mental Health suggests that unless steps are taken similar to those taken in emergency research, much of clinical research on the cognitively impaired could cease. CONCLUSION: Representatives of the government, medicine, and the public must recognize the unresolved issues and inadequate regulations relating to research on the cognitively impaired. The proposed FDA regulations for emergency research may provide guidance for a settlement of these issues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030938502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030938502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9100718

AN - SCOPUS:0030938502

VL - 45

SP - 474

EP - 481

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 4

ER -