Rheumatology Patients' Use of Complementary Therapies: Results From a One-Year Longitudinal Study

Jaya K. Rao, Kurt Kroenke, Kimberly A. Mihaliak, Steven C. Grambow, Morris Weinberger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To examine the natural history of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and its impact on outcomes within a cohort of rheumatology patients. Methods. Consecutive patients were recruited from 3 university and 3 private rheumatology practices. Baseline chart reviews provided demographic information and rheumatic diagnoses. Patients answered questions on CAM use and health status during 1 year. We identified correlates of 4 CAM usage patterns (started, maintained, stopped, nonuse) and compared outcomes among these groups. Results. Of 232 baseline participants, 203 (87%) and 177 (76%) responded to the 6- and 12-month surveys. In each survey, approximately 34% reported currently using CAM. During the year, 44% of patients remained nonusers whereas 12% started, 22% maintained, and 22% stopped use. The most frequent reasons for stopping CAM were lack of effectiveness and expense. CAM users and nonusers had no difference in outcomes. Conclusions. Arthritis patients' usage behavior varied substantially, but CAM use was not associated with a difference in outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)619-625
Number of pages7
JournalArthritis Care and Research
Volume49
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 15 2003

Fingerprint

Rheumatology
Complementary Therapies
Longitudinal Studies
History of Medicine
Private Practice
Natural History
Health Status
Arthritis

Keywords

  • Arthritis
  • Cohort
  • Complementary therapy
  • Outcome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Cite this

Rheumatology Patients' Use of Complementary Therapies : Results From a One-Year Longitudinal Study. / Rao, Jaya K.; Kroenke, Kurt; Mihaliak, Kimberly A.; Grambow, Steven C.; Weinberger, Morris.

In: Arthritis Care and Research, Vol. 49, No. 5, 15.10.2003, p. 619-625.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rao, JK, Kroenke, K, Mihaliak, KA, Grambow, SC & Weinberger, M 2003, 'Rheumatology Patients' Use of Complementary Therapies: Results From a One-Year Longitudinal Study', Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 619-625.
Rao, Jaya K. ; Kroenke, Kurt ; Mihaliak, Kimberly A. ; Grambow, Steven C. ; Weinberger, Morris. / Rheumatology Patients' Use of Complementary Therapies : Results From a One-Year Longitudinal Study. In: Arthritis Care and Research. 2003 ; Vol. 49, No. 5. pp. 619-625.
@article{43047353fa664f1690f95bd534a7bcc7,
title = "Rheumatology Patients' Use of Complementary Therapies: Results From a One-Year Longitudinal Study",
abstract = "Objective. To examine the natural history of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and its impact on outcomes within a cohort of rheumatology patients. Methods. Consecutive patients were recruited from 3 university and 3 private rheumatology practices. Baseline chart reviews provided demographic information and rheumatic diagnoses. Patients answered questions on CAM use and health status during 1 year. We identified correlates of 4 CAM usage patterns (started, maintained, stopped, nonuse) and compared outcomes among these groups. Results. Of 232 baseline participants, 203 (87{\%}) and 177 (76{\%}) responded to the 6- and 12-month surveys. In each survey, approximately 34{\%} reported currently using CAM. During the year, 44{\%} of patients remained nonusers whereas 12{\%} started, 22{\%} maintained, and 22{\%} stopped use. The most frequent reasons for stopping CAM were lack of effectiveness and expense. CAM users and nonusers had no difference in outcomes. Conclusions. Arthritis patients' usage behavior varied substantially, but CAM use was not associated with a difference in outcomes.",
keywords = "Arthritis, Cohort, Complementary therapy, Outcome",
author = "Rao, {Jaya K.} and Kurt Kroenke and Mihaliak, {Kimberly A.} and Grambow, {Steven C.} and Morris Weinberger",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "15",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "619--625",
journal = "Arthritis and Rheumatology",
issn = "2326-5191",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rheumatology Patients' Use of Complementary Therapies

T2 - Results From a One-Year Longitudinal Study

AU - Rao, Jaya K.

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

AU - Mihaliak, Kimberly A.

AU - Grambow, Steven C.

AU - Weinberger, Morris

PY - 2003/10/15

Y1 - 2003/10/15

N2 - Objective. To examine the natural history of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and its impact on outcomes within a cohort of rheumatology patients. Methods. Consecutive patients were recruited from 3 university and 3 private rheumatology practices. Baseline chart reviews provided demographic information and rheumatic diagnoses. Patients answered questions on CAM use and health status during 1 year. We identified correlates of 4 CAM usage patterns (started, maintained, stopped, nonuse) and compared outcomes among these groups. Results. Of 232 baseline participants, 203 (87%) and 177 (76%) responded to the 6- and 12-month surveys. In each survey, approximately 34% reported currently using CAM. During the year, 44% of patients remained nonusers whereas 12% started, 22% maintained, and 22% stopped use. The most frequent reasons for stopping CAM were lack of effectiveness and expense. CAM users and nonusers had no difference in outcomes. Conclusions. Arthritis patients' usage behavior varied substantially, but CAM use was not associated with a difference in outcomes.

AB - Objective. To examine the natural history of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and its impact on outcomes within a cohort of rheumatology patients. Methods. Consecutive patients were recruited from 3 university and 3 private rheumatology practices. Baseline chart reviews provided demographic information and rheumatic diagnoses. Patients answered questions on CAM use and health status during 1 year. We identified correlates of 4 CAM usage patterns (started, maintained, stopped, nonuse) and compared outcomes among these groups. Results. Of 232 baseline participants, 203 (87%) and 177 (76%) responded to the 6- and 12-month surveys. In each survey, approximately 34% reported currently using CAM. During the year, 44% of patients remained nonusers whereas 12% started, 22% maintained, and 22% stopped use. The most frequent reasons for stopping CAM were lack of effectiveness and expense. CAM users and nonusers had no difference in outcomes. Conclusions. Arthritis patients' usage behavior varied substantially, but CAM use was not associated with a difference in outcomes.

KW - Arthritis

KW - Cohort

KW - Complementary therapy

KW - Outcome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142095106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142095106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14558046

AN - SCOPUS:0142095106

VL - 49

SP - 619

EP - 625

JO - Arthritis and Rheumatology

JF - Arthritis and Rheumatology

SN - 2326-5191

IS - 5

ER -