Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings

Thomas Imperiale, David R. Wagner, Ching Y. Lin, Gregory N. Larkin, James D. Rogge, David F. Ransohoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

889 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Methods. The clinical significance of a distal colorectal polyp is uncertain. We determined the risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, defined as a polyp with villous features, a polyp with high-grade dysplasia, or cancer, among persons with distal hyperplastic or neoplastic polyps as compared with the risk among persons with no distal polyps. We analyzed data from 1994 consecutive asymptomatic adults (age, 50 years or older) who underwent colonoscopic screening for the first time between September 1995 and December 1998 as part of a program sponsored by an employer. The location and histologic features of all polyps were recorded. CoIonoscopy to the level of the cecum was completed in 97.0 percent of the patients. Results. Sixty- one patients (3.1 percent) had advanced lesions in the distal colon, including 5 with cancer, and 50 (2.5 percent) had advanced proximal lesions, including 7 with cancer. Twenty-three patients with advanced proximal neoplasms (46 percent) had no distal polyps. The prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia among patients with no distal polyps was 1.5 percent (23 cases among 1564 persons; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 2.1 percent). Among patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, those with distal tubular adenomas, and those with advanced distal polyps, the prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia was 4.0 percent (8 cases among 201 patients), 7.1 percent (12 cases among 168 patients), and 11.5 percent (7 cases among 61 patients), respectively. The relative risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, adjusted for age and sex, was 2.6 for patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, 4.0 for those with distal tubular adenomas, and 6.7 for those with advanced distal polyps, as compared with patients who had no distal polyps. Older age and male sex were associated with an increased risk of advanced proximal neoplasia (relative risk, 1.3 for every five years of age and 3.3 for male sex). Conclusions. Asymptomatic persons 50 years of age or older who have polyps in the distal colon are more likely to have advanced proxima neoplasia than are persons without distal polyps. However, if colonoscopic screening is performed only in persons with distal polyps, about half the cases of advanced proximal neoplasia will not be detected.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-174
Number of pages6
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume343
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 20 2000

Fingerprint

Polyps
Neoplasms
Adenoma
Colon
Cecum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. / Imperiale, Thomas; Wagner, David R.; Lin, Ching Y.; Larkin, Gregory N.; Rogge, James D.; Ransohoff, David F.

In: New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 343, No. 3, 20.07.2000, p. 169-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Imperiale, Thomas ; Wagner, David R. ; Lin, Ching Y. ; Larkin, Gregory N. ; Rogge, James D. ; Ransohoff, David F. / Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. In: New England Journal of Medicine. 2000 ; Vol. 343, No. 3. pp. 169-174.
@article{4f1501eba5684d1aa3612d660094e534,
title = "Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings",
abstract = "Background and Methods. The clinical significance of a distal colorectal polyp is uncertain. We determined the risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, defined as a polyp with villous features, a polyp with high-grade dysplasia, or cancer, among persons with distal hyperplastic or neoplastic polyps as compared with the risk among persons with no distal polyps. We analyzed data from 1994 consecutive asymptomatic adults (age, 50 years or older) who underwent colonoscopic screening for the first time between September 1995 and December 1998 as part of a program sponsored by an employer. The location and histologic features of all polyps were recorded. CoIonoscopy to the level of the cecum was completed in 97.0 percent of the patients. Results. Sixty- one patients (3.1 percent) had advanced lesions in the distal colon, including 5 with cancer, and 50 (2.5 percent) had advanced proximal lesions, including 7 with cancer. Twenty-three patients with advanced proximal neoplasms (46 percent) had no distal polyps. The prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia among patients with no distal polyps was 1.5 percent (23 cases among 1564 persons; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 2.1 percent). Among patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, those with distal tubular adenomas, and those with advanced distal polyps, the prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia was 4.0 percent (8 cases among 201 patients), 7.1 percent (12 cases among 168 patients), and 11.5 percent (7 cases among 61 patients), respectively. The relative risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, adjusted for age and sex, was 2.6 for patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, 4.0 for those with distal tubular adenomas, and 6.7 for those with advanced distal polyps, as compared with patients who had no distal polyps. Older age and male sex were associated with an increased risk of advanced proximal neoplasia (relative risk, 1.3 for every five years of age and 3.3 for male sex). Conclusions. Asymptomatic persons 50 years of age or older who have polyps in the distal colon are more likely to have advanced proxima neoplasia than are persons without distal polyps. However, if colonoscopic screening is performed only in persons with distal polyps, about half the cases of advanced proximal neoplasia will not be detected.",
author = "Thomas Imperiale and Wagner, {David R.} and Lin, {Ching Y.} and Larkin, {Gregory N.} and Rogge, {James D.} and Ransohoff, {David F.}",
year = "2000",
month = "7",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1056/NEJM200007203430302",
language = "English",
volume = "343",
pages = "169--174",
journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0028-4793",
publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings

AU - Imperiale, Thomas

AU - Wagner, David R.

AU - Lin, Ching Y.

AU - Larkin, Gregory N.

AU - Rogge, James D.

AU - Ransohoff, David F.

PY - 2000/7/20

Y1 - 2000/7/20

N2 - Background and Methods. The clinical significance of a distal colorectal polyp is uncertain. We determined the risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, defined as a polyp with villous features, a polyp with high-grade dysplasia, or cancer, among persons with distal hyperplastic or neoplastic polyps as compared with the risk among persons with no distal polyps. We analyzed data from 1994 consecutive asymptomatic adults (age, 50 years or older) who underwent colonoscopic screening for the first time between September 1995 and December 1998 as part of a program sponsored by an employer. The location and histologic features of all polyps were recorded. CoIonoscopy to the level of the cecum was completed in 97.0 percent of the patients. Results. Sixty- one patients (3.1 percent) had advanced lesions in the distal colon, including 5 with cancer, and 50 (2.5 percent) had advanced proximal lesions, including 7 with cancer. Twenty-three patients with advanced proximal neoplasms (46 percent) had no distal polyps. The prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia among patients with no distal polyps was 1.5 percent (23 cases among 1564 persons; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 2.1 percent). Among patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, those with distal tubular adenomas, and those with advanced distal polyps, the prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia was 4.0 percent (8 cases among 201 patients), 7.1 percent (12 cases among 168 patients), and 11.5 percent (7 cases among 61 patients), respectively. The relative risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, adjusted for age and sex, was 2.6 for patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, 4.0 for those with distal tubular adenomas, and 6.7 for those with advanced distal polyps, as compared with patients who had no distal polyps. Older age and male sex were associated with an increased risk of advanced proximal neoplasia (relative risk, 1.3 for every five years of age and 3.3 for male sex). Conclusions. Asymptomatic persons 50 years of age or older who have polyps in the distal colon are more likely to have advanced proxima neoplasia than are persons without distal polyps. However, if colonoscopic screening is performed only in persons with distal polyps, about half the cases of advanced proximal neoplasia will not be detected.

AB - Background and Methods. The clinical significance of a distal colorectal polyp is uncertain. We determined the risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, defined as a polyp with villous features, a polyp with high-grade dysplasia, or cancer, among persons with distal hyperplastic or neoplastic polyps as compared with the risk among persons with no distal polyps. We analyzed data from 1994 consecutive asymptomatic adults (age, 50 years or older) who underwent colonoscopic screening for the first time between September 1995 and December 1998 as part of a program sponsored by an employer. The location and histologic features of all polyps were recorded. CoIonoscopy to the level of the cecum was completed in 97.0 percent of the patients. Results. Sixty- one patients (3.1 percent) had advanced lesions in the distal colon, including 5 with cancer, and 50 (2.5 percent) had advanced proximal lesions, including 7 with cancer. Twenty-three patients with advanced proximal neoplasms (46 percent) had no distal polyps. The prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia among patients with no distal polyps was 1.5 percent (23 cases among 1564 persons; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.9 to 2.1 percent). Among patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, those with distal tubular adenomas, and those with advanced distal polyps, the prevalence of advanced proximal neoplasia was 4.0 percent (8 cases among 201 patients), 7.1 percent (12 cases among 168 patients), and 11.5 percent (7 cases among 61 patients), respectively. The relative risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, adjusted for age and sex, was 2.6 for patients with distal hyperplastic polyps, 4.0 for those with distal tubular adenomas, and 6.7 for those with advanced distal polyps, as compared with patients who had no distal polyps. Older age and male sex were associated with an increased risk of advanced proximal neoplasia (relative risk, 1.3 for every five years of age and 3.3 for male sex). Conclusions. Asymptomatic persons 50 years of age or older who have polyps in the distal colon are more likely to have advanced proxima neoplasia than are persons without distal polyps. However, if colonoscopic screening is performed only in persons with distal polyps, about half the cases of advanced proximal neoplasia will not be detected.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034691750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034691750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1056/NEJM200007203430302

DO - 10.1056/NEJM200007203430302

M3 - Article

C2 - 10900275

AN - SCOPUS:0034691750

VL - 343

SP - 169

EP - 174

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

SN - 0028-4793

IS - 3

ER -