Risk of adverse events on epilepsy monitoring units

A survey of epilepsy professionals

P. O. Shafer, Janice Buelow, D. M. Ficker, M. J. Pugh, A. M. Kanner, P. Dean, P. Levisohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2008 a workgroup of health care professionals from the American Epilepsy Society (AES) was convened to address the lack of consensus regarding patient care in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). The group developed a questionnaire designed to identify the extent to which selected adverse events occurred in EMUs, and it was sent via email to all members of the AES. We asked that only one representative from each center report. Seventy responses were received. The number of centers reporting the following adverse events included: falls by 69%, status epilepticus by 63%, and postictal psychosis by 54%. Infrequent events with serious consequences were also reported including pneumonia by 10%, cardiac arrest by 7%, fractures by 6%, and death by 3% (N = 2). Of the 58 respondents who reported using intracranial electrodes, 37.9% (N = 22) reported that patients pulled out or dislodged electrodes. This study highlights the need for EMUs to identify and address potential safety risks in their environment, patient population, and system of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)502-505
Number of pages4
JournalEpilepsy and Behavior
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Epilepsy
Electrodes
Status Epilepticus
Heart Arrest
Psychotic Disorders
Pneumonia
Consensus
Patient Care
Delivery of Health Care
Safety
Surveys and Questionnaires
Population

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • EEG telemetry
  • Epilepsy
  • Epilepsy monitoring units
  • Injuries
  • Patient safety
  • Risks
  • Seizure observation
  • Seizures
  • Video monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Shafer, P. O., Buelow, J., Ficker, D. M., Pugh, M. J., Kanner, A. M., Dean, P., & Levisohn, P. (2011). Risk of adverse events on epilepsy monitoring units: A survey of epilepsy professionals. Epilepsy and Behavior, 20(3), 502-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.048

Risk of adverse events on epilepsy monitoring units : A survey of epilepsy professionals. / Shafer, P. O.; Buelow, Janice; Ficker, D. M.; Pugh, M. J.; Kanner, A. M.; Dean, P.; Levisohn, P.

In: Epilepsy and Behavior, Vol. 20, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 502-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shafer, PO, Buelow, J, Ficker, DM, Pugh, MJ, Kanner, AM, Dean, P & Levisohn, P 2011, 'Risk of adverse events on epilepsy monitoring units: A survey of epilepsy professionals', Epilepsy and Behavior, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 502-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.048
Shafer, P. O. ; Buelow, Janice ; Ficker, D. M. ; Pugh, M. J. ; Kanner, A. M. ; Dean, P. ; Levisohn, P. / Risk of adverse events on epilepsy monitoring units : A survey of epilepsy professionals. In: Epilepsy and Behavior. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 502-505.
@article{2699eb5db08a4c2284b474cc7766172d,
title = "Risk of adverse events on epilepsy monitoring units: A survey of epilepsy professionals",
abstract = "In 2008 a workgroup of health care professionals from the American Epilepsy Society (AES) was convened to address the lack of consensus regarding patient care in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). The group developed a questionnaire designed to identify the extent to which selected adverse events occurred in EMUs, and it was sent via email to all members of the AES. We asked that only one representative from each center report. Seventy responses were received. The number of centers reporting the following adverse events included: falls by 69{\%}, status epilepticus by 63{\%}, and postictal psychosis by 54{\%}. Infrequent events with serious consequences were also reported including pneumonia by 10{\%}, cardiac arrest by 7{\%}, fractures by 6{\%}, and death by 3{\%} (N = 2). Of the 58 respondents who reported using intracranial electrodes, 37.9{\%} (N = 22) reported that patients pulled out or dislodged electrodes. This study highlights the need for EMUs to identify and address potential safety risks in their environment, patient population, and system of care.",
keywords = "Adverse events, EEG telemetry, Epilepsy, Epilepsy monitoring units, Injuries, Patient safety, Risks, Seizure observation, Seizures, Video monitoring",
author = "Shafer, {P. O.} and Janice Buelow and Ficker, {D. M.} and Pugh, {M. J.} and Kanner, {A. M.} and P. Dean and P. Levisohn",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.048",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "502--505",
journal = "Epilepsy and Behavior",
issn = "1525-5050",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk of adverse events on epilepsy monitoring units

T2 - A survey of epilepsy professionals

AU - Shafer, P. O.

AU - Buelow, Janice

AU - Ficker, D. M.

AU - Pugh, M. J.

AU - Kanner, A. M.

AU - Dean, P.

AU - Levisohn, P.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - In 2008 a workgroup of health care professionals from the American Epilepsy Society (AES) was convened to address the lack of consensus regarding patient care in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). The group developed a questionnaire designed to identify the extent to which selected adverse events occurred in EMUs, and it was sent via email to all members of the AES. We asked that only one representative from each center report. Seventy responses were received. The number of centers reporting the following adverse events included: falls by 69%, status epilepticus by 63%, and postictal psychosis by 54%. Infrequent events with serious consequences were also reported including pneumonia by 10%, cardiac arrest by 7%, fractures by 6%, and death by 3% (N = 2). Of the 58 respondents who reported using intracranial electrodes, 37.9% (N = 22) reported that patients pulled out or dislodged electrodes. This study highlights the need for EMUs to identify and address potential safety risks in their environment, patient population, and system of care.

AB - In 2008 a workgroup of health care professionals from the American Epilepsy Society (AES) was convened to address the lack of consensus regarding patient care in epilepsy monitoring units (EMUs). The group developed a questionnaire designed to identify the extent to which selected adverse events occurred in EMUs, and it was sent via email to all members of the AES. We asked that only one representative from each center report. Seventy responses were received. The number of centers reporting the following adverse events included: falls by 69%, status epilepticus by 63%, and postictal psychosis by 54%. Infrequent events with serious consequences were also reported including pneumonia by 10%, cardiac arrest by 7%, fractures by 6%, and death by 3% (N = 2). Of the 58 respondents who reported using intracranial electrodes, 37.9% (N = 22) reported that patients pulled out or dislodged electrodes. This study highlights the need for EMUs to identify and address potential safety risks in their environment, patient population, and system of care.

KW - Adverse events

KW - EEG telemetry

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Epilepsy monitoring units

KW - Injuries

KW - Patient safety

KW - Risks

KW - Seizure observation

KW - Seizures

KW - Video monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952736741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952736741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.048

DO - 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.12.048

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 502

EP - 505

JO - Epilepsy and Behavior

JF - Epilepsy and Behavior

SN - 1525-5050

IS - 3

ER -