Role of endoscopic ultrasound for evaluating gastrointestinal tract disorders in pediatrics: A tertiary care center experience

Abdullah Al-Rashdan, Julia Leblanc, Stuart Sherman, Lee McHenry, John DeWitt, Mohammad Al-Haddad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND:: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with or without fine needle aspiration (FNA) has a well-established role in the evaluation of various gastrointestinal (GI) tract disorders in adults. The clinical impact of EUS on the management of the pediatric population remains less clear. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and applications of EUS ± FNA in pediatric GI tract disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Using a prospectively maintained EUS database, all patients 18 years of age or younger referred for EUS at our institution were identified. Retrospective chart review was conducted to document procedure indications, type of anesthesia used, EUS findings, final FNA cytology results, and clinical impact of EUS ± FNA on the subsequent management of pediatric patients. RESULTS:: Fifty-eight EUS procedures were performed in 56 patients (35 girls). Median age was 16 years (range 4-18 years). The main indications for EUS were acute or recurrent pancreatitis, abdominal pain of suspected pancreatobiliary origin, suspected biliary obstruction, upper GI mucosal/submucosal lesions, and evaluation of pancreatic abnormalities seen on prior imaging. Sedation used included nurse-administered propofol sedation in 38 (73%), general anesthesia in 9 (17%), and fentanyl with meperidine in 3 (6%). Five therapeutic procedures performed included celiac plexus blocks in 4 and 1 EUS-guided pancreatogram. In 44 (86%) patients, EUS provided a new diagnosis. The procedure was successfully completed in all patients with no reported complications. CONCLUSIONS:: EUS ± FNA is feasible and safe and makes a significant impact on most pediatric patients. Nurse-administered propofol sedation appears to be safe and well tolerated in this group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)718-722
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Tertiary Care Centers
Gastrointestinal Tract
Fine Needle Biopsy
Pediatrics
Propofol
Celiac Plexus
Nurses
Meperidine
Feasibility Studies
Fentanyl
Pancreatitis
General Anesthesia
Abdominal Pain
Cell Biology
Anesthesia
Databases
Safety
Population

Keywords

  • children
  • endoscopic ultrasound
  • fine needle aspiration
  • gastrointestinal tract disorders
  • nurse-administered propofol sedation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Role of endoscopic ultrasound for evaluating gastrointestinal tract disorders in pediatrics : A tertiary care center experience. / Al-Rashdan, Abdullah; Leblanc, Julia; Sherman, Stuart; McHenry, Lee; DeWitt, John; Al-Haddad, Mohammad.

In: Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Vol. 51, No. 6, 12.2010, p. 718-722.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d386fd7368e54ad4917099907813eb2e,
title = "Role of endoscopic ultrasound for evaluating gastrointestinal tract disorders in pediatrics: A tertiary care center experience",
abstract = "BACKGROUND:: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with or without fine needle aspiration (FNA) has a well-established role in the evaluation of various gastrointestinal (GI) tract disorders in adults. The clinical impact of EUS on the management of the pediatric population remains less clear. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and applications of EUS ± FNA in pediatric GI tract disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Using a prospectively maintained EUS database, all patients 18 years of age or younger referred for EUS at our institution were identified. Retrospective chart review was conducted to document procedure indications, type of anesthesia used, EUS findings, final FNA cytology results, and clinical impact of EUS ± FNA on the subsequent management of pediatric patients. RESULTS:: Fifty-eight EUS procedures were performed in 56 patients (35 girls). Median age was 16 years (range 4-18 years). The main indications for EUS were acute or recurrent pancreatitis, abdominal pain of suspected pancreatobiliary origin, suspected biliary obstruction, upper GI mucosal/submucosal lesions, and evaluation of pancreatic abnormalities seen on prior imaging. Sedation used included nurse-administered propofol sedation in 38 (73{\%}), general anesthesia in 9 (17{\%}), and fentanyl with meperidine in 3 (6{\%}). Five therapeutic procedures performed included celiac plexus blocks in 4 and 1 EUS-guided pancreatogram. In 44 (86{\%}) patients, EUS provided a new diagnosis. The procedure was successfully completed in all patients with no reported complications. CONCLUSIONS:: EUS ± FNA is feasible and safe and makes a significant impact on most pediatric patients. Nurse-administered propofol sedation appears to be safe and well tolerated in this group.",
keywords = "children, endoscopic ultrasound, fine needle aspiration, gastrointestinal tract disorders, nurse-administered propofol sedation",
author = "Abdullah Al-Rashdan and Julia Leblanc and Stuart Sherman and Lee McHenry and John DeWitt and Mohammad Al-Haddad",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181dac094",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "718--722",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition",
issn = "0277-2116",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of endoscopic ultrasound for evaluating gastrointestinal tract disorders in pediatrics

T2 - A tertiary care center experience

AU - Al-Rashdan, Abdullah

AU - Leblanc, Julia

AU - Sherman, Stuart

AU - McHenry, Lee

AU - DeWitt, John

AU - Al-Haddad, Mohammad

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - BACKGROUND:: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with or without fine needle aspiration (FNA) has a well-established role in the evaluation of various gastrointestinal (GI) tract disorders in adults. The clinical impact of EUS on the management of the pediatric population remains less clear. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and applications of EUS ± FNA in pediatric GI tract disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Using a prospectively maintained EUS database, all patients 18 years of age or younger referred for EUS at our institution were identified. Retrospective chart review was conducted to document procedure indications, type of anesthesia used, EUS findings, final FNA cytology results, and clinical impact of EUS ± FNA on the subsequent management of pediatric patients. RESULTS:: Fifty-eight EUS procedures were performed in 56 patients (35 girls). Median age was 16 years (range 4-18 years). The main indications for EUS were acute or recurrent pancreatitis, abdominal pain of suspected pancreatobiliary origin, suspected biliary obstruction, upper GI mucosal/submucosal lesions, and evaluation of pancreatic abnormalities seen on prior imaging. Sedation used included nurse-administered propofol sedation in 38 (73%), general anesthesia in 9 (17%), and fentanyl with meperidine in 3 (6%). Five therapeutic procedures performed included celiac plexus blocks in 4 and 1 EUS-guided pancreatogram. In 44 (86%) patients, EUS provided a new diagnosis. The procedure was successfully completed in all patients with no reported complications. CONCLUSIONS:: EUS ± FNA is feasible and safe and makes a significant impact on most pediatric patients. Nurse-administered propofol sedation appears to be safe and well tolerated in this group.

AB - BACKGROUND:: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with or without fine needle aspiration (FNA) has a well-established role in the evaluation of various gastrointestinal (GI) tract disorders in adults. The clinical impact of EUS on the management of the pediatric population remains less clear. This study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and applications of EUS ± FNA in pediatric GI tract disorders. PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Using a prospectively maintained EUS database, all patients 18 years of age or younger referred for EUS at our institution were identified. Retrospective chart review was conducted to document procedure indications, type of anesthesia used, EUS findings, final FNA cytology results, and clinical impact of EUS ± FNA on the subsequent management of pediatric patients. RESULTS:: Fifty-eight EUS procedures were performed in 56 patients (35 girls). Median age was 16 years (range 4-18 years). The main indications for EUS were acute or recurrent pancreatitis, abdominal pain of suspected pancreatobiliary origin, suspected biliary obstruction, upper GI mucosal/submucosal lesions, and evaluation of pancreatic abnormalities seen on prior imaging. Sedation used included nurse-administered propofol sedation in 38 (73%), general anesthesia in 9 (17%), and fentanyl with meperidine in 3 (6%). Five therapeutic procedures performed included celiac plexus blocks in 4 and 1 EUS-guided pancreatogram. In 44 (86%) patients, EUS provided a new diagnosis. The procedure was successfully completed in all patients with no reported complications. CONCLUSIONS:: EUS ± FNA is feasible and safe and makes a significant impact on most pediatric patients. Nurse-administered propofol sedation appears to be safe and well tolerated in this group.

KW - children

KW - endoscopic ultrasound

KW - fine needle aspiration

KW - gastrointestinal tract disorders

KW - nurse-administered propofol sedation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650509984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650509984&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181dac094

DO - 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181dac094

M3 - Article

C2 - 20683206

AN - SCOPUS:78650509984

VL - 51

SP - 718

EP - 722

JO - Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

JF - Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

SN - 0277-2116

IS - 6

ER -