Ruling out pulmonary embolism in patients with high pretest probability

Murtaza Akhter, Jeffrey Kline, Bikash Bhattarai, Mark Courtney, Christopher Kabrhel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: The American College of Emergency Physicians guidelines recommend more aggressive workup beyond imaging alone in patients with a high pretest probability (PTP) of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the ability of multiple tests to safely rule out PE in high PTP patients is not known. We sought to measure the ability of negative computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) along with negative D-dimer to rule out PE in these high-risk patients. Methods: We analyzed data from a previous prospective observational study conducted in 12 emergency departments (ED). Wells score criteria were entered by providers before final PE testing. PE was diagnosed by imaging on the index ED visit, or within 45 days, demonstrating either PE or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or if the patient died of PE during the 45-day, follow-up period. Testing threshold was set at 1.8%. Results: A total of 7,940 patients were enrolled and tested for PE, and 257 had high PTP (Wells >6). Sixteen of these high-risk patients had negative CTPA and negative D-dimer, of whom two were positive for PE (12.5% [95% confidence interval (2.2%-40.0%)]). One of these patients had a DVT on CT venogram and the other was diagnosed at follow-up. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that in patients with high PTP of PE, neither negative CTPA by itself nor a negative CTPA plus a negative D-dimer are sufficient to rule out PE. More aggressive workup strategies may be required for these patients

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-493
Number of pages7
JournalWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Embolism
Lung
Venous Thrombosis
Hospital Emergency Service
Observational Studies
Prospective Studies
Guidelines
Confidence Intervals
Computed Tomography Angiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Ruling out pulmonary embolism in patients with high pretest probability. / Akhter, Murtaza; Kline, Jeffrey; Bhattarai, Bikash; Courtney, Mark; Kabrhel, Christopher.

In: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 487-493.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Akhter, Murtaza ; Kline, Jeffrey ; Bhattarai, Bikash ; Courtney, Mark ; Kabrhel, Christopher. / Ruling out pulmonary embolism in patients with high pretest probability. In: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 487-493.
@article{aefe78a22f5445eeaf27eaa5b2d894ff,
title = "Ruling out pulmonary embolism in patients with high pretest probability",
abstract = "Introduction: The American College of Emergency Physicians guidelines recommend more aggressive workup beyond imaging alone in patients with a high pretest probability (PTP) of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the ability of multiple tests to safely rule out PE in high PTP patients is not known. We sought to measure the ability of negative computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) along with negative D-dimer to rule out PE in these high-risk patients. Methods: We analyzed data from a previous prospective observational study conducted in 12 emergency departments (ED). Wells score criteria were entered by providers before final PE testing. PE was diagnosed by imaging on the index ED visit, or within 45 days, demonstrating either PE or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or if the patient died of PE during the 45-day, follow-up period. Testing threshold was set at 1.8{\%}. Results: A total of 7,940 patients were enrolled and tested for PE, and 257 had high PTP (Wells >6). Sixteen of these high-risk patients had negative CTPA and negative D-dimer, of whom two were positive for PE (12.5{\%} [95{\%} confidence interval (2.2{\%}-40.0{\%})]). One of these patients had a DVT on CT venogram and the other was diagnosed at follow-up. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that in patients with high PTP of PE, neither negative CTPA by itself nor a negative CTPA plus a negative D-dimer are sufficient to rule out PE. More aggressive workup strategies may be required for these patients",
author = "Murtaza Akhter and Jeffrey Kline and Bikash Bhattarai and Mark Courtney and Christopher Kabrhel",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5811/westjem.2017.10.36219",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "487--493",
journal = "Western Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1936-900X",
publisher = "University of California",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ruling out pulmonary embolism in patients with high pretest probability

AU - Akhter, Murtaza

AU - Kline, Jeffrey

AU - Bhattarai, Bikash

AU - Courtney, Mark

AU - Kabrhel, Christopher

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Introduction: The American College of Emergency Physicians guidelines recommend more aggressive workup beyond imaging alone in patients with a high pretest probability (PTP) of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the ability of multiple tests to safely rule out PE in high PTP patients is not known. We sought to measure the ability of negative computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) along with negative D-dimer to rule out PE in these high-risk patients. Methods: We analyzed data from a previous prospective observational study conducted in 12 emergency departments (ED). Wells score criteria were entered by providers before final PE testing. PE was diagnosed by imaging on the index ED visit, or within 45 days, demonstrating either PE or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or if the patient died of PE during the 45-day, follow-up period. Testing threshold was set at 1.8%. Results: A total of 7,940 patients were enrolled and tested for PE, and 257 had high PTP (Wells >6). Sixteen of these high-risk patients had negative CTPA and negative D-dimer, of whom two were positive for PE (12.5% [95% confidence interval (2.2%-40.0%)]). One of these patients had a DVT on CT venogram and the other was diagnosed at follow-up. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that in patients with high PTP of PE, neither negative CTPA by itself nor a negative CTPA plus a negative D-dimer are sufficient to rule out PE. More aggressive workup strategies may be required for these patients

AB - Introduction: The American College of Emergency Physicians guidelines recommend more aggressive workup beyond imaging alone in patients with a high pretest probability (PTP) of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the ability of multiple tests to safely rule out PE in high PTP patients is not known. We sought to measure the ability of negative computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) along with negative D-dimer to rule out PE in these high-risk patients. Methods: We analyzed data from a previous prospective observational study conducted in 12 emergency departments (ED). Wells score criteria were entered by providers before final PE testing. PE was diagnosed by imaging on the index ED visit, or within 45 days, demonstrating either PE or deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or if the patient died of PE during the 45-day, follow-up period. Testing threshold was set at 1.8%. Results: A total of 7,940 patients were enrolled and tested for PE, and 257 had high PTP (Wells >6). Sixteen of these high-risk patients had negative CTPA and negative D-dimer, of whom two were positive for PE (12.5% [95% confidence interval (2.2%-40.0%)]). One of these patients had a DVT on CT venogram and the other was diagnosed at follow-up. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that in patients with high PTP of PE, neither negative CTPA by itself nor a negative CTPA plus a negative D-dimer are sufficient to rule out PE. More aggressive workup strategies may be required for these patients

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047611926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047611926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5811/westjem.2017.10.36219

DO - 10.5811/westjem.2017.10.36219

M3 - Article

C2 - 29760845

AN - SCOPUS:85047611926

VL - 19

SP - 487

EP - 493

JO - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 1936-900X

IS - 3

ER -