Sample size considerations in designing studies with intra-oral models.

G. K. Stookey, Barry Katz, B. B. Beiswanger, A. J. Dunipace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Especially during recent years, the use of pre-clinical models for predicting the efficacy of fluoride systems has assumed greater importance within the scientific community. Originally utilized primarily to screen experimental fluoride delivery systems, preclinical models are now being considered as predictors of clinical efficacy in lieu of controlled clinical caries trials. Of the various preclinical models presently available, human intra-oral models have the greatest potential for reflecting intended usage conditions and therefore may be the most meaningful models for predicting clinical efficacy. However, only with the proper consideration of numerous critical variables can studies using intra-oral models be appropriately designed to achieve the desired objectives. Clearly, these models must provide relevant information in a manner which reflects clinically established cariostatic activity and be capable of detecting established differences in the amount of cariostatic activity, i.e., dose-response effects. Three sources of variation must be considered before an appropriate study design and sample size can be chosen. Based on fluoride uptake data from an intra-oral model with proximally-located enamel specimens, estimates of variation among subjects, within subjects, and among specimens within subjects were obtained. Multiple specimens per panelist do not affect the first two sources of variation. Thus, the number of panelists, and not the number of specimens, is of primary importance when pre-test data are used to choose the appropriate study design and calculate the required sample size.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)819-821
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Dental Research
Volume71 Spec No
StatePublished - Apr 1992

Fingerprint

Fluorides
Sample Size
Controlled Clinical Trials
Dental Enamel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Stookey, G. K., Katz, B., Beiswanger, B. B., & Dunipace, A. J. (1992). Sample size considerations in designing studies with intra-oral models. Journal of Dental Research, 71 Spec No, 819-821.

Sample size considerations in designing studies with intra-oral models. / Stookey, G. K.; Katz, Barry; Beiswanger, B. B.; Dunipace, A. J.

In: Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 71 Spec No, 04.1992, p. 819-821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stookey, GK, Katz, B, Beiswanger, BB & Dunipace, AJ 1992, 'Sample size considerations in designing studies with intra-oral models.', Journal of Dental Research, vol. 71 Spec No, pp. 819-821.
Stookey GK, Katz B, Beiswanger BB, Dunipace AJ. Sample size considerations in designing studies with intra-oral models. Journal of Dental Research. 1992 Apr;71 Spec No:819-821.
Stookey, G. K. ; Katz, Barry ; Beiswanger, B. B. ; Dunipace, A. J. / Sample size considerations in designing studies with intra-oral models. In: Journal of Dental Research. 1992 ; Vol. 71 Spec No. pp. 819-821.
@article{5dca797ddc1044019e4a7464ad5cf0e4,
title = "Sample size considerations in designing studies with intra-oral models.",
abstract = "Especially during recent years, the use of pre-clinical models for predicting the efficacy of fluoride systems has assumed greater importance within the scientific community. Originally utilized primarily to screen experimental fluoride delivery systems, preclinical models are now being considered as predictors of clinical efficacy in lieu of controlled clinical caries trials. Of the various preclinical models presently available, human intra-oral models have the greatest potential for reflecting intended usage conditions and therefore may be the most meaningful models for predicting clinical efficacy. However, only with the proper consideration of numerous critical variables can studies using intra-oral models be appropriately designed to achieve the desired objectives. Clearly, these models must provide relevant information in a manner which reflects clinically established cariostatic activity and be capable of detecting established differences in the amount of cariostatic activity, i.e., dose-response effects. Three sources of variation must be considered before an appropriate study design and sample size can be chosen. Based on fluoride uptake data from an intra-oral model with proximally-located enamel specimens, estimates of variation among subjects, within subjects, and among specimens within subjects were obtained. Multiple specimens per panelist do not affect the first two sources of variation. Thus, the number of panelists, and not the number of specimens, is of primary importance when pre-test data are used to choose the appropriate study design and calculate the required sample size.",
author = "Stookey, {G. K.} and Barry Katz and Beiswanger, {B. B.} and Dunipace, {A. J.}",
year = "1992",
month = "4",
language = "English",
volume = "71 Spec No",
pages = "819--821",
journal = "Journal of Dental Research",
issn = "0022-0345",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sample size considerations in designing studies with intra-oral models.

AU - Stookey, G. K.

AU - Katz, Barry

AU - Beiswanger, B. B.

AU - Dunipace, A. J.

PY - 1992/4

Y1 - 1992/4

N2 - Especially during recent years, the use of pre-clinical models for predicting the efficacy of fluoride systems has assumed greater importance within the scientific community. Originally utilized primarily to screen experimental fluoride delivery systems, preclinical models are now being considered as predictors of clinical efficacy in lieu of controlled clinical caries trials. Of the various preclinical models presently available, human intra-oral models have the greatest potential for reflecting intended usage conditions and therefore may be the most meaningful models for predicting clinical efficacy. However, only with the proper consideration of numerous critical variables can studies using intra-oral models be appropriately designed to achieve the desired objectives. Clearly, these models must provide relevant information in a manner which reflects clinically established cariostatic activity and be capable of detecting established differences in the amount of cariostatic activity, i.e., dose-response effects. Three sources of variation must be considered before an appropriate study design and sample size can be chosen. Based on fluoride uptake data from an intra-oral model with proximally-located enamel specimens, estimates of variation among subjects, within subjects, and among specimens within subjects were obtained. Multiple specimens per panelist do not affect the first two sources of variation. Thus, the number of panelists, and not the number of specimens, is of primary importance when pre-test data are used to choose the appropriate study design and calculate the required sample size.

AB - Especially during recent years, the use of pre-clinical models for predicting the efficacy of fluoride systems has assumed greater importance within the scientific community. Originally utilized primarily to screen experimental fluoride delivery systems, preclinical models are now being considered as predictors of clinical efficacy in lieu of controlled clinical caries trials. Of the various preclinical models presently available, human intra-oral models have the greatest potential for reflecting intended usage conditions and therefore may be the most meaningful models for predicting clinical efficacy. However, only with the proper consideration of numerous critical variables can studies using intra-oral models be appropriately designed to achieve the desired objectives. Clearly, these models must provide relevant information in a manner which reflects clinically established cariostatic activity and be capable of detecting established differences in the amount of cariostatic activity, i.e., dose-response effects. Three sources of variation must be considered before an appropriate study design and sample size can be chosen. Based on fluoride uptake data from an intra-oral model with proximally-located enamel specimens, estimates of variation among subjects, within subjects, and among specimens within subjects were obtained. Multiple specimens per panelist do not affect the first two sources of variation. Thus, the number of panelists, and not the number of specimens, is of primary importance when pre-test data are used to choose the appropriate study design and calculate the required sample size.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026842757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026842757&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 71 Spec No

SP - 819

EP - 821

JO - Journal of Dental Research

JF - Journal of Dental Research

SN - 0022-0345

ER -