Scaffoldless tissue-engineered nerve conduit promotes peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery after tibial nerve injury in rats

Aaron M. Adams, Keith W. VanDusen, Tatiana Kostrominova, Jacob P. Mertens, Lisa M. Larkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Damage to peripheral nerve tissue may cause loss of function in both the nerve and the targeted muscles it innervates. This study compared the repair capability of engineered nerve conduit (ENC), engineered fibroblast conduit (EFC), and autograft in a 10-mm tibial nerve gap. ENCs were fabricated utilizing primary fibroblasts and the nerve cells of rats on embryonic day 15 (E15). EFCs were fabricated utilizing primary fibroblasts only. Following a 12-week recovery, nerve repair was assessed by measuring contractile properties in the medial gastrocnemius muscle, distal motor nerve conduction velocity in the lateral gastrocnemius, and histology of muscle and nerve. The autografts, ENCs and EFCs reestablished 96%, 87% and 84% of native distal motor nerve conduction velocity in the lateral gastrocnemius, 100%, 44% and 44% of native specific force of medical gastrocnemius, and 63%, 61% and 67% of native medial gastrocnemius mass, respectively. Histology of the repaired nerve revealed large axons in the autograft, larger but fewer axons in the ENC repair, and many smaller axons in the EFC repair. Muscle histology revealed similar muscle fiber cross-sectional areas among autograft, ENC and EFC repairs. In conclusion, both ENCs and EFCs promoted nerve regeneration in a 10-mm tibial nerve gap repair, suggesting that the E15 rat nerve cells may not be necessary for nerve regeneration, and EFC alone can suffice for peripheral nerve injury repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1529-1537
Number of pages9
JournalNeural Regeneration Research
Volume12
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Nerve Tissue
Tibial Nerve
Nerve Regeneration
Peripheral Nerves
Fibroblasts
Autografts
Wounds and Injuries
Axons
Histology
Neural Conduction
Muscles
Skeletal Muscle
Neurons
Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Keywords

  • Fibroblasts
  • Nerve regeneration
  • Neural cells
  • Neural conduit
  • Peripheral nerve repair
  • Tissue engineering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Scaffoldless tissue-engineered nerve conduit promotes peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery after tibial nerve injury in rats. / Adams, Aaron M.; VanDusen, Keith W.; Kostrominova, Tatiana; Mertens, Jacob P.; Larkin, Lisa M.

In: Neural Regeneration Research, Vol. 12, No. 9, 01.09.2017, p. 1529-1537.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{437dff5317cd4604823122b346aa450a,
title = "Scaffoldless tissue-engineered nerve conduit promotes peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery after tibial nerve injury in rats",
abstract = "Damage to peripheral nerve tissue may cause loss of function in both the nerve and the targeted muscles it innervates. This study compared the repair capability of engineered nerve conduit (ENC), engineered fibroblast conduit (EFC), and autograft in a 10-mm tibial nerve gap. ENCs were fabricated utilizing primary fibroblasts and the nerve cells of rats on embryonic day 15 (E15). EFCs were fabricated utilizing primary fibroblasts only. Following a 12-week recovery, nerve repair was assessed by measuring contractile properties in the medial gastrocnemius muscle, distal motor nerve conduction velocity in the lateral gastrocnemius, and histology of muscle and nerve. The autografts, ENCs and EFCs reestablished 96{\%}, 87{\%} and 84{\%} of native distal motor nerve conduction velocity in the lateral gastrocnemius, 100{\%}, 44{\%} and 44{\%} of native specific force of medical gastrocnemius, and 63{\%}, 61{\%} and 67{\%} of native medial gastrocnemius mass, respectively. Histology of the repaired nerve revealed large axons in the autograft, larger but fewer axons in the ENC repair, and many smaller axons in the EFC repair. Muscle histology revealed similar muscle fiber cross-sectional areas among autograft, ENC and EFC repairs. In conclusion, both ENCs and EFCs promoted nerve regeneration in a 10-mm tibial nerve gap repair, suggesting that the E15 rat nerve cells may not be necessary for nerve regeneration, and EFC alone can suffice for peripheral nerve injury repair.",
keywords = "Fibroblasts, Nerve regeneration, Neural cells, Neural conduit, Peripheral nerve repair, Tissue engineering",
author = "Adams, {Aaron M.} and VanDusen, {Keith W.} and Tatiana Kostrominova and Mertens, {Jacob P.} and Larkin, {Lisa M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4103/1673-5374.215265",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "1529--1537",
journal = "Neural Regeneration Research",
issn = "1673-5374",
publisher = "Editorial Board of Neural Regeneration Research",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scaffoldless tissue-engineered nerve conduit promotes peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery after tibial nerve injury in rats

AU - Adams, Aaron M.

AU - VanDusen, Keith W.

AU - Kostrominova, Tatiana

AU - Mertens, Jacob P.

AU - Larkin, Lisa M.

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Damage to peripheral nerve tissue may cause loss of function in both the nerve and the targeted muscles it innervates. This study compared the repair capability of engineered nerve conduit (ENC), engineered fibroblast conduit (EFC), and autograft in a 10-mm tibial nerve gap. ENCs were fabricated utilizing primary fibroblasts and the nerve cells of rats on embryonic day 15 (E15). EFCs were fabricated utilizing primary fibroblasts only. Following a 12-week recovery, nerve repair was assessed by measuring contractile properties in the medial gastrocnemius muscle, distal motor nerve conduction velocity in the lateral gastrocnemius, and histology of muscle and nerve. The autografts, ENCs and EFCs reestablished 96%, 87% and 84% of native distal motor nerve conduction velocity in the lateral gastrocnemius, 100%, 44% and 44% of native specific force of medical gastrocnemius, and 63%, 61% and 67% of native medial gastrocnemius mass, respectively. Histology of the repaired nerve revealed large axons in the autograft, larger but fewer axons in the ENC repair, and many smaller axons in the EFC repair. Muscle histology revealed similar muscle fiber cross-sectional areas among autograft, ENC and EFC repairs. In conclusion, both ENCs and EFCs promoted nerve regeneration in a 10-mm tibial nerve gap repair, suggesting that the E15 rat nerve cells may not be necessary for nerve regeneration, and EFC alone can suffice for peripheral nerve injury repair.

AB - Damage to peripheral nerve tissue may cause loss of function in both the nerve and the targeted muscles it innervates. This study compared the repair capability of engineered nerve conduit (ENC), engineered fibroblast conduit (EFC), and autograft in a 10-mm tibial nerve gap. ENCs were fabricated utilizing primary fibroblasts and the nerve cells of rats on embryonic day 15 (E15). EFCs were fabricated utilizing primary fibroblasts only. Following a 12-week recovery, nerve repair was assessed by measuring contractile properties in the medial gastrocnemius muscle, distal motor nerve conduction velocity in the lateral gastrocnemius, and histology of muscle and nerve. The autografts, ENCs and EFCs reestablished 96%, 87% and 84% of native distal motor nerve conduction velocity in the lateral gastrocnemius, 100%, 44% and 44% of native specific force of medical gastrocnemius, and 63%, 61% and 67% of native medial gastrocnemius mass, respectively. Histology of the repaired nerve revealed large axons in the autograft, larger but fewer axons in the ENC repair, and many smaller axons in the EFC repair. Muscle histology revealed similar muscle fiber cross-sectional areas among autograft, ENC and EFC repairs. In conclusion, both ENCs and EFCs promoted nerve regeneration in a 10-mm tibial nerve gap repair, suggesting that the E15 rat nerve cells may not be necessary for nerve regeneration, and EFC alone can suffice for peripheral nerve injury repair.

KW - Fibroblasts

KW - Nerve regeneration

KW - Neural cells

KW - Neural conduit

KW - Peripheral nerve repair

KW - Tissue engineering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032437209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032437209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4103/1673-5374.215265

DO - 10.4103/1673-5374.215265

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032437209

VL - 12

SP - 1529

EP - 1537

JO - Neural Regeneration Research

JF - Neural Regeneration Research

SN - 1673-5374

IS - 9

ER -