Scientific Impact of Women in Academic Surgery

Nadine Housri, Michael C. Cheung, Leonidas Koniaris, Teresa Zimmers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the scientific impact of women in the surgical literature. Methods: Gender of the principal investigator of every abstract presented at the 2002, 2003, and 2004 annual meetings of the Association for Academic Surgery and Society of University Surgeons was identified by internet search. Resulting publications were identified using PubMed. Journal impact factor and number of article citations were determined using ISI Web of Knowledge. Results: The principal investigator's gender was identified for 649 (98.8%) of the 657 abstracts presented at the 2002-2004 AAS meetings. Women authored 9.1% of abstracts and 11.8% of total resulting publications. The publication rate of abstracts by women was significantly higher than that of men (69.5% versus 52.4%, P = 0.0132). There was a trend toward higher average impact factors of journals in which female authors published (3.265 versus 2.673, P = 0.0626). There was no significant difference in mean number of citations per publication. The principal investigator's gender was identified for all 337 (100%) abstracts presented at the 2002-2004 SUS meetings. Women authored 11.0% of abstracts and 11.2% of resulting publications. Publication rates and average citation numbers were similar for female and male authors. The average impact factors of journals in which women published were significantly higher (4.741 versus 3.348, P = 0.0082). Conclusions: Although women comprise a small proportion of principal investigators on abstracts presented at these conferences, the quality of their presented work is equal to or better than those of their male counterparts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13-16
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume148
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Publications
Journal Impact Factor
Research Personnel
PubMed
Internet

Keywords

  • achievement
  • career
  • education
  • female
  • male
  • peer review
  • publishing
  • research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Scientific Impact of Women in Academic Surgery. / Housri, Nadine; Cheung, Michael C.; Koniaris, Leonidas; Zimmers, Teresa.

In: Journal of Surgical Research, Vol. 148, No. 1, 07.2008, p. 13-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Housri, Nadine ; Cheung, Michael C. ; Koniaris, Leonidas ; Zimmers, Teresa. / Scientific Impact of Women in Academic Surgery. In: Journal of Surgical Research. 2008 ; Vol. 148, No. 1. pp. 13-16.
@article{1314d918271741249586d080b740b270,
title = "Scientific Impact of Women in Academic Surgery",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the scientific impact of women in the surgical literature. Methods: Gender of the principal investigator of every abstract presented at the 2002, 2003, and 2004 annual meetings of the Association for Academic Surgery and Society of University Surgeons was identified by internet search. Resulting publications were identified using PubMed. Journal impact factor and number of article citations were determined using ISI Web of Knowledge. Results: The principal investigator's gender was identified for 649 (98.8{\%}) of the 657 abstracts presented at the 2002-2004 AAS meetings. Women authored 9.1{\%} of abstracts and 11.8{\%} of total resulting publications. The publication rate of abstracts by women was significantly higher than that of men (69.5{\%} versus 52.4{\%}, P = 0.0132). There was a trend toward higher average impact factors of journals in which female authors published (3.265 versus 2.673, P = 0.0626). There was no significant difference in mean number of citations per publication. The principal investigator's gender was identified for all 337 (100{\%}) abstracts presented at the 2002-2004 SUS meetings. Women authored 11.0{\%} of abstracts and 11.2{\%} of resulting publications. Publication rates and average citation numbers were similar for female and male authors. The average impact factors of journals in which women published were significantly higher (4.741 versus 3.348, P = 0.0082). Conclusions: Although women comprise a small proportion of principal investigators on abstracts presented at these conferences, the quality of their presented work is equal to or better than those of their male counterparts.",
keywords = "achievement, career, education, female, male, peer review, publishing, research",
author = "Nadine Housri and Cheung, {Michael C.} and Leonidas Koniaris and Teresa Zimmers",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jss.2008.02.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "13--16",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Research",
issn = "0022-4804",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific Impact of Women in Academic Surgery

AU - Housri, Nadine

AU - Cheung, Michael C.

AU - Koniaris, Leonidas

AU - Zimmers, Teresa

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the scientific impact of women in the surgical literature. Methods: Gender of the principal investigator of every abstract presented at the 2002, 2003, and 2004 annual meetings of the Association for Academic Surgery and Society of University Surgeons was identified by internet search. Resulting publications were identified using PubMed. Journal impact factor and number of article citations were determined using ISI Web of Knowledge. Results: The principal investigator's gender was identified for 649 (98.8%) of the 657 abstracts presented at the 2002-2004 AAS meetings. Women authored 9.1% of abstracts and 11.8% of total resulting publications. The publication rate of abstracts by women was significantly higher than that of men (69.5% versus 52.4%, P = 0.0132). There was a trend toward higher average impact factors of journals in which female authors published (3.265 versus 2.673, P = 0.0626). There was no significant difference in mean number of citations per publication. The principal investigator's gender was identified for all 337 (100%) abstracts presented at the 2002-2004 SUS meetings. Women authored 11.0% of abstracts and 11.2% of resulting publications. Publication rates and average citation numbers were similar for female and male authors. The average impact factors of journals in which women published were significantly higher (4.741 versus 3.348, P = 0.0082). Conclusions: Although women comprise a small proportion of principal investigators on abstracts presented at these conferences, the quality of their presented work is equal to or better than those of their male counterparts.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the scientific impact of women in the surgical literature. Methods: Gender of the principal investigator of every abstract presented at the 2002, 2003, and 2004 annual meetings of the Association for Academic Surgery and Society of University Surgeons was identified by internet search. Resulting publications were identified using PubMed. Journal impact factor and number of article citations were determined using ISI Web of Knowledge. Results: The principal investigator's gender was identified for 649 (98.8%) of the 657 abstracts presented at the 2002-2004 AAS meetings. Women authored 9.1% of abstracts and 11.8% of total resulting publications. The publication rate of abstracts by women was significantly higher than that of men (69.5% versus 52.4%, P = 0.0132). There was a trend toward higher average impact factors of journals in which female authors published (3.265 versus 2.673, P = 0.0626). There was no significant difference in mean number of citations per publication. The principal investigator's gender was identified for all 337 (100%) abstracts presented at the 2002-2004 SUS meetings. Women authored 11.0% of abstracts and 11.2% of resulting publications. Publication rates and average citation numbers were similar for female and male authors. The average impact factors of journals in which women published were significantly higher (4.741 versus 3.348, P = 0.0082). Conclusions: Although women comprise a small proportion of principal investigators on abstracts presented at these conferences, the quality of their presented work is equal to or better than those of their male counterparts.

KW - achievement

KW - career

KW - education

KW - female

KW - male

KW - peer review

KW - publishing

KW - research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45049088796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45049088796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2008.02.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2008.02.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 18570925

AN - SCOPUS:45049088796

VL - 148

SP - 13

EP - 16

JO - Journal of Surgical Research

JF - Journal of Surgical Research

SN - 0022-4804

IS - 1

ER -