Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Hospitalized older adults often lack decisional capacity, but outside of the intensive care unit and end-of-life care settings, little is known about the frequency of decision making by family members or other surrogates or its implications for hospital care. OBJECTIVE: To describe the scope of surrogate decision making, the hospital course, and outcomes for older adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, observational study conducted in medicine and medical intensive care unit services of 2 hospitals in 1 Midwestern city in 1083 hospitalized older adults identified by their physicians as requiring major medical decisions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical characteristics, hospital outcomes, nature of major medical decisions, and surrogate involvement. RESULTS: According to physician reports, at 48 hours of hospitalization, 47.4% (95% CI, 44.4%-50.4%) of older adults required at least some surrogate involvement, including 23.0% (20.6%-25.6%) with all decisions made by a surrogate. Among patients who required a surrogate for at least 1 decision within 48 hours, 57.2% required decisions about life-sustaining care (mostly addressing code status), 48.6% about procedures and operations, and 46.9% about discharge planning. Patients who needed a surrogate experienced a more complex hospital course with greater use of ventilators (2.5% of patients who made decisions and 13.2% of patients who required any surrogate decisions; P < .001), artificial nutrition (1.7% of patients and 14.4% of surrogates; P < .001), and length of stay (median, 6 days for patients and 7 days for surrogates; P < .001). They were more likely to be discharged to an extended-care facility (21.2% with patient decisions and 40.9% with surrogate decisions; P < .001) and had higher hospital mortality (0.0% patients and 5.9% surrogates; P < .001). Most surrogates were daughters (58.9%), sons (25.0%), or spouses (20.6%). Overall, only 7.4% had a living will and 25.0% had a health care representative document in the medical record. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Surrogate decision making occurs for nearly half of hospitalized older adults and includes both complete decision making by the surrogate and joint decision making by the patient and surrogate. Surrogates commonly face a broad range of decisions in the intensive care unit and the hospital ward setting. Hospital functions should be redesigned to account for the large and growing role of surrogates, supporting them as they make health care decisions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)370-377
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Internal Medicine
Volume174
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Intensive Care Units
Nuclear Family
Living Wills
Skilled Nursing Facilities
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Terminal Care
Patient Discharge
Mechanical Ventilators
Hospital Mortality
Spouses
Medical Records
Observational Studies
Length of Stay
Hospitalization
Medicine
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults. / Torke, Alexia; Sachs, Greg; Helft, Paul; Montz, Kianna; Hui, Siu; Slaven, James E.; Callahan, Christopher.

In: JAMA Internal Medicine, Vol. 174, No. 3, 2014, p. 370-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1555999ed1f4271bccd55f12c8885e3,
title = "Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults",
abstract = "IMPORTANCE: Hospitalized older adults often lack decisional capacity, but outside of the intensive care unit and end-of-life care settings, little is known about the frequency of decision making by family members or other surrogates or its implications for hospital care. OBJECTIVE: To describe the scope of surrogate decision making, the hospital course, and outcomes for older adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, observational study conducted in medicine and medical intensive care unit services of 2 hospitals in 1 Midwestern city in 1083 hospitalized older adults identified by their physicians as requiring major medical decisions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical characteristics, hospital outcomes, nature of major medical decisions, and surrogate involvement. RESULTS: According to physician reports, at 48 hours of hospitalization, 47.4{\%} (95{\%} CI, 44.4{\%}-50.4{\%}) of older adults required at least some surrogate involvement, including 23.0{\%} (20.6{\%}-25.6{\%}) with all decisions made by a surrogate. Among patients who required a surrogate for at least 1 decision within 48 hours, 57.2{\%} required decisions about life-sustaining care (mostly addressing code status), 48.6{\%} about procedures and operations, and 46.9{\%} about discharge planning. Patients who needed a surrogate experienced a more complex hospital course with greater use of ventilators (2.5{\%} of patients who made decisions and 13.2{\%} of patients who required any surrogate decisions; P < .001), artificial nutrition (1.7{\%} of patients and 14.4{\%} of surrogates; P < .001), and length of stay (median, 6 days for patients and 7 days for surrogates; P < .001). They were more likely to be discharged to an extended-care facility (21.2{\%} with patient decisions and 40.9{\%} with surrogate decisions; P < .001) and had higher hospital mortality (0.0{\%} patients and 5.9{\%} surrogates; P < .001). Most surrogates were daughters (58.9{\%}), sons (25.0{\%}), or spouses (20.6{\%}). Overall, only 7.4{\%} had a living will and 25.0{\%} had a health care representative document in the medical record. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Surrogate decision making occurs for nearly half of hospitalized older adults and includes both complete decision making by the surrogate and joint decision making by the patient and surrogate. Surrogates commonly face a broad range of decisions in the intensive care unit and the hospital ward setting. Hospital functions should be redesigned to account for the large and growing role of surrogates, supporting them as they make health care decisions.",
author = "Alexia Torke and Greg Sachs and Paul Helft and Kianna Montz and Siu Hui and Slaven, {James E.} and Christopher Callahan",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13315",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
pages = "370--377",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scope and outcomes of surrogate decision making among hospitalized older adults

AU - Torke, Alexia

AU - Sachs, Greg

AU - Helft, Paul

AU - Montz, Kianna

AU - Hui, Siu

AU - Slaven, James E.

AU - Callahan, Christopher

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - IMPORTANCE: Hospitalized older adults often lack decisional capacity, but outside of the intensive care unit and end-of-life care settings, little is known about the frequency of decision making by family members or other surrogates or its implications for hospital care. OBJECTIVE: To describe the scope of surrogate decision making, the hospital course, and outcomes for older adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, observational study conducted in medicine and medical intensive care unit services of 2 hospitals in 1 Midwestern city in 1083 hospitalized older adults identified by their physicians as requiring major medical decisions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical characteristics, hospital outcomes, nature of major medical decisions, and surrogate involvement. RESULTS: According to physician reports, at 48 hours of hospitalization, 47.4% (95% CI, 44.4%-50.4%) of older adults required at least some surrogate involvement, including 23.0% (20.6%-25.6%) with all decisions made by a surrogate. Among patients who required a surrogate for at least 1 decision within 48 hours, 57.2% required decisions about life-sustaining care (mostly addressing code status), 48.6% about procedures and operations, and 46.9% about discharge planning. Patients who needed a surrogate experienced a more complex hospital course with greater use of ventilators (2.5% of patients who made decisions and 13.2% of patients who required any surrogate decisions; P < .001), artificial nutrition (1.7% of patients and 14.4% of surrogates; P < .001), and length of stay (median, 6 days for patients and 7 days for surrogates; P < .001). They were more likely to be discharged to an extended-care facility (21.2% with patient decisions and 40.9% with surrogate decisions; P < .001) and had higher hospital mortality (0.0% patients and 5.9% surrogates; P < .001). Most surrogates were daughters (58.9%), sons (25.0%), or spouses (20.6%). Overall, only 7.4% had a living will and 25.0% had a health care representative document in the medical record. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Surrogate decision making occurs for nearly half of hospitalized older adults and includes both complete decision making by the surrogate and joint decision making by the patient and surrogate. Surrogates commonly face a broad range of decisions in the intensive care unit and the hospital ward setting. Hospital functions should be redesigned to account for the large and growing role of surrogates, supporting them as they make health care decisions.

AB - IMPORTANCE: Hospitalized older adults often lack decisional capacity, but outside of the intensive care unit and end-of-life care settings, little is known about the frequency of decision making by family members or other surrogates or its implications for hospital care. OBJECTIVE: To describe the scope of surrogate decision making, the hospital course, and outcomes for older adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, observational study conducted in medicine and medical intensive care unit services of 2 hospitals in 1 Midwestern city in 1083 hospitalized older adults identified by their physicians as requiring major medical decisions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Clinical characteristics, hospital outcomes, nature of major medical decisions, and surrogate involvement. RESULTS: According to physician reports, at 48 hours of hospitalization, 47.4% (95% CI, 44.4%-50.4%) of older adults required at least some surrogate involvement, including 23.0% (20.6%-25.6%) with all decisions made by a surrogate. Among patients who required a surrogate for at least 1 decision within 48 hours, 57.2% required decisions about life-sustaining care (mostly addressing code status), 48.6% about procedures and operations, and 46.9% about discharge planning. Patients who needed a surrogate experienced a more complex hospital course with greater use of ventilators (2.5% of patients who made decisions and 13.2% of patients who required any surrogate decisions; P < .001), artificial nutrition (1.7% of patients and 14.4% of surrogates; P < .001), and length of stay (median, 6 days for patients and 7 days for surrogates; P < .001). They were more likely to be discharged to an extended-care facility (21.2% with patient decisions and 40.9% with surrogate decisions; P < .001) and had higher hospital mortality (0.0% patients and 5.9% surrogates; P < .001). Most surrogates were daughters (58.9%), sons (25.0%), or spouses (20.6%). Overall, only 7.4% had a living will and 25.0% had a health care representative document in the medical record. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Surrogate decision making occurs for nearly half of hospitalized older adults and includes both complete decision making by the surrogate and joint decision making by the patient and surrogate. Surrogates commonly face a broad range of decisions in the intensive care unit and the hospital ward setting. Hospital functions should be redesigned to account for the large and growing role of surrogates, supporting them as they make health care decisions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897734540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897734540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13315

DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13315

M3 - Article

VL - 174

SP - 370

EP - 377

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 3

ER -