Second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene exhibits low wear

James A. D'Antonio, William Capello, Rama Ramakrishnan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Compared with conventional polyethylene, first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylenes have low wear, but controversy exists regarding their reduced mechanical strength and/or retained free radicals. Secondgeneration highly cross-linked polyethylenes have been developed to reduce wear, maintain mechanical strength, and have oxidative resistance, but it is unclear whether they do so. Questions/purposes The primary objective of this study therefore was to determine if a second-generation annealed material has low linear wear at 5 years followup. Secondary objectives were to evaluate for overall survivorship, implant fixation, osteolysis, and effect of socket inclination on wear. Methods In a multicenter prospective study, we radiographically evaluated 155 patients (167 hips) at 3 years, 124 patients (132 hips) at 4 years, and 46 patients (51 hips) at 5 years. The linear head penetration rate was measured at 6 weeks, 1 year, and yearly through 5 years. Results The head penetration per year after the first year of bedding-in was 0.024 mm per year at 3 years, 0.020 mm per year at 4 years, and 0.008 mm per year at 5 years. The average wear rate over 5 years was 0.015 mm per year and represents a 58% improvement over a first-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene. The Kaplan- Meier survivorship (revision for any reason) was 97.8%. We revised no hip for bearing surface failure and observed no osteolysis. Socket inclination did not affect linear wear. Conclusions These data suggest the linear wear rate for a second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene is no greater than that for historic controls of first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylenes, and no untoward complications were encountered with this new material.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1696-1704
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Volume470
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Polyethylenes
Polyethylene
Hip
Osteolysis
Survival Rate
Head
Multicenter Studies
Free Radicals
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene exhibits low wear. / D'Antonio, James A.; Capello, William; Ramakrishnan, Rama.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 470, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 1696-1704.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a99b72d8a6c04a7ca54584156d9936e5,
title = "Second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene exhibits low wear",
abstract = "Background Compared with conventional polyethylene, first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylenes have low wear, but controversy exists regarding their reduced mechanical strength and/or retained free radicals. Secondgeneration highly cross-linked polyethylenes have been developed to reduce wear, maintain mechanical strength, and have oxidative resistance, but it is unclear whether they do so. Questions/purposes The primary objective of this study therefore was to determine if a second-generation annealed material has low linear wear at 5 years followup. Secondary objectives were to evaluate for overall survivorship, implant fixation, osteolysis, and effect of socket inclination on wear. Methods In a multicenter prospective study, we radiographically evaluated 155 patients (167 hips) at 3 years, 124 patients (132 hips) at 4 years, and 46 patients (51 hips) at 5 years. The linear head penetration rate was measured at 6 weeks, 1 year, and yearly through 5 years. Results The head penetration per year after the first year of bedding-in was 0.024 mm per year at 3 years, 0.020 mm per year at 4 years, and 0.008 mm per year at 5 years. The average wear rate over 5 years was 0.015 mm per year and represents a 58{\%} improvement over a first-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene. The Kaplan- Meier survivorship (revision for any reason) was 97.8{\%}. We revised no hip for bearing surface failure and observed no osteolysis. Socket inclination did not affect linear wear. Conclusions These data suggest the linear wear rate for a second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene is no greater than that for historic controls of first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylenes, and no untoward complications were encountered with this new material.",
author = "D'Antonio, {James A.} and William Capello and Rama Ramakrishnan",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s11999-011-2177-3",
language = "English",
volume = "470",
pages = "1696--1704",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene exhibits low wear

AU - D'Antonio, James A.

AU - Capello, William

AU - Ramakrishnan, Rama

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Background Compared with conventional polyethylene, first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylenes have low wear, but controversy exists regarding their reduced mechanical strength and/or retained free radicals. Secondgeneration highly cross-linked polyethylenes have been developed to reduce wear, maintain mechanical strength, and have oxidative resistance, but it is unclear whether they do so. Questions/purposes The primary objective of this study therefore was to determine if a second-generation annealed material has low linear wear at 5 years followup. Secondary objectives were to evaluate for overall survivorship, implant fixation, osteolysis, and effect of socket inclination on wear. Methods In a multicenter prospective study, we radiographically evaluated 155 patients (167 hips) at 3 years, 124 patients (132 hips) at 4 years, and 46 patients (51 hips) at 5 years. The linear head penetration rate was measured at 6 weeks, 1 year, and yearly through 5 years. Results The head penetration per year after the first year of bedding-in was 0.024 mm per year at 3 years, 0.020 mm per year at 4 years, and 0.008 mm per year at 5 years. The average wear rate over 5 years was 0.015 mm per year and represents a 58% improvement over a first-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene. The Kaplan- Meier survivorship (revision for any reason) was 97.8%. We revised no hip for bearing surface failure and observed no osteolysis. Socket inclination did not affect linear wear. Conclusions These data suggest the linear wear rate for a second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene is no greater than that for historic controls of first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylenes, and no untoward complications were encountered with this new material.

AB - Background Compared with conventional polyethylene, first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylenes have low wear, but controversy exists regarding their reduced mechanical strength and/or retained free radicals. Secondgeneration highly cross-linked polyethylenes have been developed to reduce wear, maintain mechanical strength, and have oxidative resistance, but it is unclear whether they do so. Questions/purposes The primary objective of this study therefore was to determine if a second-generation annealed material has low linear wear at 5 years followup. Secondary objectives were to evaluate for overall survivorship, implant fixation, osteolysis, and effect of socket inclination on wear. Methods In a multicenter prospective study, we radiographically evaluated 155 patients (167 hips) at 3 years, 124 patients (132 hips) at 4 years, and 46 patients (51 hips) at 5 years. The linear head penetration rate was measured at 6 weeks, 1 year, and yearly through 5 years. Results The head penetration per year after the first year of bedding-in was 0.024 mm per year at 3 years, 0.020 mm per year at 4 years, and 0.008 mm per year at 5 years. The average wear rate over 5 years was 0.015 mm per year and represents a 58% improvement over a first-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene. The Kaplan- Meier survivorship (revision for any reason) was 97.8%. We revised no hip for bearing surface failure and observed no osteolysis. Socket inclination did not affect linear wear. Conclusions These data suggest the linear wear rate for a second-generation annealed highly cross-linked polyethylene is no greater than that for historic controls of first-generation highly cross-linked polyethylenes, and no untoward complications were encountered with this new material.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864277314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864277314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11999-011-2177-3

DO - 10.1007/s11999-011-2177-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 22161120

AN - SCOPUS:84864277314

VL - 470

SP - 1696

EP - 1704

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 6

ER -