Self-report pain and symptom measures for primary dysmenorrhoea

A critical review

Chen Chen, K. L. Kwekkeboom, S. E. Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Primary dysmenorrhoea (PD) is highly prevalent among women of reproductive age and it can have significant short- and long-term consequences for both women and society as a whole. Validated symptom measures are fundamental for researchers to understand women's symptom experience of PD and to test symptom interventions. The objective of this paper was to critically review the content and psychometric properties of self-report tools to measure symptoms of PD. Databases including PubMed, PsychoINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments were searched for self-report symptom measures that had been used among women with either PD or perimenstrual symptoms. A total of 15 measures met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The measures were categorized into generic pain measures, dysmenorrhoea-specific measures, and tools designed to measure perimenstrual symptoms. These measures had varying degrees of comprehensiveness of symptoms being measured, relevance to PD, multidimensionality and psychometric soundness. No single measure was found to be optimal for use, but some dysmenorrhoea-specific measures could be recommended if revised and further tested. Key issues in symptom measurement for PD are discussed. Future research needs to strengthen dysmenorrhoea-specific symptom measures by including a comprehensive list of symptoms based on the pathogenesis of PD, exploring relevant symptom dimensions beyond symptom severity (e.g., frequency, duration, symptom distress), and testing psychometric properties of the adapted tools using sound methodology and diverse samples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-391
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dysmenorrhea
Self Report
Pain
Psychometrics
Health
PubMed
Nursing
Research Personnel
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Self-report pain and symptom measures for primary dysmenorrhoea : A critical review. / Chen, Chen; Kwekkeboom, K. L.; Ward, S. E.

In: European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom), Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.03.2015, p. 377-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{91743b0e1799497596cb2c82bdbd6c5f,
title = "Self-report pain and symptom measures for primary dysmenorrhoea: A critical review",
abstract = "Primary dysmenorrhoea (PD) is highly prevalent among women of reproductive age and it can have significant short- and long-term consequences for both women and society as a whole. Validated symptom measures are fundamental for researchers to understand women's symptom experience of PD and to test symptom interventions. The objective of this paper was to critically review the content and psychometric properties of self-report tools to measure symptoms of PD. Databases including PubMed, PsychoINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments were searched for self-report symptom measures that had been used among women with either PD or perimenstrual symptoms. A total of 15 measures met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The measures were categorized into generic pain measures, dysmenorrhoea-specific measures, and tools designed to measure perimenstrual symptoms. These measures had varying degrees of comprehensiveness of symptoms being measured, relevance to PD, multidimensionality and psychometric soundness. No single measure was found to be optimal for use, but some dysmenorrhoea-specific measures could be recommended if revised and further tested. Key issues in symptom measurement for PD are discussed. Future research needs to strengthen dysmenorrhoea-specific symptom measures by including a comprehensive list of symptoms based on the pathogenesis of PD, exploring relevant symptom dimensions beyond symptom severity (e.g., frequency, duration, symptom distress), and testing psychometric properties of the adapted tools using sound methodology and diverse samples.",
author = "Chen Chen and Kwekkeboom, {K. L.} and Ward, {S. E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ejp.556",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "377--391",
journal = "European Journal of Pain",
issn = "1090-3801",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-report pain and symptom measures for primary dysmenorrhoea

T2 - A critical review

AU - Chen, Chen

AU - Kwekkeboom, K. L.

AU - Ward, S. E.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Primary dysmenorrhoea (PD) is highly prevalent among women of reproductive age and it can have significant short- and long-term consequences for both women and society as a whole. Validated symptom measures are fundamental for researchers to understand women's symptom experience of PD and to test symptom interventions. The objective of this paper was to critically review the content and psychometric properties of self-report tools to measure symptoms of PD. Databases including PubMed, PsychoINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments were searched for self-report symptom measures that had been used among women with either PD or perimenstrual symptoms. A total of 15 measures met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The measures were categorized into generic pain measures, dysmenorrhoea-specific measures, and tools designed to measure perimenstrual symptoms. These measures had varying degrees of comprehensiveness of symptoms being measured, relevance to PD, multidimensionality and psychometric soundness. No single measure was found to be optimal for use, but some dysmenorrhoea-specific measures could be recommended if revised and further tested. Key issues in symptom measurement for PD are discussed. Future research needs to strengthen dysmenorrhoea-specific symptom measures by including a comprehensive list of symptoms based on the pathogenesis of PD, exploring relevant symptom dimensions beyond symptom severity (e.g., frequency, duration, symptom distress), and testing psychometric properties of the adapted tools using sound methodology and diverse samples.

AB - Primary dysmenorrhoea (PD) is highly prevalent among women of reproductive age and it can have significant short- and long-term consequences for both women and society as a whole. Validated symptom measures are fundamental for researchers to understand women's symptom experience of PD and to test symptom interventions. The objective of this paper was to critically review the content and psychometric properties of self-report tools to measure symptoms of PD. Databases including PubMed, PsychoINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments were searched for self-report symptom measures that had been used among women with either PD or perimenstrual symptoms. A total of 15 measures met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The measures were categorized into generic pain measures, dysmenorrhoea-specific measures, and tools designed to measure perimenstrual symptoms. These measures had varying degrees of comprehensiveness of symptoms being measured, relevance to PD, multidimensionality and psychometric soundness. No single measure was found to be optimal for use, but some dysmenorrhoea-specific measures could be recommended if revised and further tested. Key issues in symptom measurement for PD are discussed. Future research needs to strengthen dysmenorrhoea-specific symptom measures by including a comprehensive list of symptoms based on the pathogenesis of PD, exploring relevant symptom dimensions beyond symptom severity (e.g., frequency, duration, symptom distress), and testing psychometric properties of the adapted tools using sound methodology and diverse samples.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923640825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923640825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejp.556

DO - 10.1002/ejp.556

M3 - Review article

VL - 19

SP - 377

EP - 391

JO - European Journal of Pain

JF - European Journal of Pain

SN - 1090-3801

IS - 3

ER -