Seminomas with exclusive intertubular growth: A report of 12 clinically and grossly inconspicuous tumors

John D. Henley, Robert H. Young, Christopher L. Wade, Thomas Ulbright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intertubular growth in seminoma is characterized by seminoma cells, either singly or in small clusters, between preserved seminiferous tubules. It is a common, although focal, pattern in many seminomas where it is admixed with the usual sheet-like and nested arrangements and does not pose any diagnostic problems in such cases. We describe, in contrast, the clinicopathologic features of 12 cases with exclusively intertubular growth and which were typically diagnostically problematic. The 12 patients lacked overt clinical signs of a primary testicular mass. Three presented with infertility, 2 with cryptorchidism, 2 with metastases, 1 with pain and testicular atrophy, and the presentation was unknown in 4. On gross examination, no mass was apparent in 9 cases with available data, but ill-defined firm areas or foci of whitish-brown discoloration were occasionally noted. Microscopically, the process was characterized by individual, dispersed tumor cells or small clusters of cells growing between the seminiferous tubules. The tumor cells were often obscured by a lymphocytic infiltrate or, less commonly, nodules of hyperplastic Leydig cells. Common associated findings were tubular atrophy with sclerosis and thickening of tubular basement membranes and intratubular germ cell neoplasia, unclassified type. Immunostains against placental-like alkaline phosphatase and c-KIT (CD117) highlighted the seminoma cells in all cases examined. In pure form, intertubular seminoma is both clinically and pathologically inconspicuous and may be misdiagnosed as atrophy, scar, or orchitis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1163-1168
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume28
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004

Fingerprint

Seminoma
Atrophy
Growth
Seminiferous Tubules
Neoplasms
Orchitis
Cryptorchidism
Leydig Cells
Sclerosis
Diagnostic Errors
Basement Membrane
Germ Cells
Infertility
Cicatrix
Neoplasm Metastasis
Pain

Keywords

  • Intertubular pattern
  • Seminoma
  • Testicular atrophy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Seminomas with exclusive intertubular growth : A report of 12 clinically and grossly inconspicuous tumors. / Henley, John D.; Young, Robert H.; Wade, Christopher L.; Ulbright, Thomas.

In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Vol. 28, No. 9, 09.2004, p. 1163-1168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{027e778886e94b6b94af92553c5c6dff,
title = "Seminomas with exclusive intertubular growth: A report of 12 clinically and grossly inconspicuous tumors",
abstract = "Intertubular growth in seminoma is characterized by seminoma cells, either singly or in small clusters, between preserved seminiferous tubules. It is a common, although focal, pattern in many seminomas where it is admixed with the usual sheet-like and nested arrangements and does not pose any diagnostic problems in such cases. We describe, in contrast, the clinicopathologic features of 12 cases with exclusively intertubular growth and which were typically diagnostically problematic. The 12 patients lacked overt clinical signs of a primary testicular mass. Three presented with infertility, 2 with cryptorchidism, 2 with metastases, 1 with pain and testicular atrophy, and the presentation was unknown in 4. On gross examination, no mass was apparent in 9 cases with available data, but ill-defined firm areas or foci of whitish-brown discoloration were occasionally noted. Microscopically, the process was characterized by individual, dispersed tumor cells or small clusters of cells growing between the seminiferous tubules. The tumor cells were often obscured by a lymphocytic infiltrate or, less commonly, nodules of hyperplastic Leydig cells. Common associated findings were tubular atrophy with sclerosis and thickening of tubular basement membranes and intratubular germ cell neoplasia, unclassified type. Immunostains against placental-like alkaline phosphatase and c-KIT (CD117) highlighted the seminoma cells in all cases examined. In pure form, intertubular seminoma is both clinically and pathologically inconspicuous and may be misdiagnosed as atrophy, scar, or orchitis.",
keywords = "Intertubular pattern, Seminoma, Testicular atrophy",
author = "Henley, {John D.} and Young, {Robert H.} and Wade, {Christopher L.} and Thomas Ulbright",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/01.pas.0000132742.12221.82",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1163--1168",
journal = "American Journal of Surgical Pathology",
issn = "0147-5185",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seminomas with exclusive intertubular growth

T2 - A report of 12 clinically and grossly inconspicuous tumors

AU - Henley, John D.

AU - Young, Robert H.

AU - Wade, Christopher L.

AU - Ulbright, Thomas

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - Intertubular growth in seminoma is characterized by seminoma cells, either singly or in small clusters, between preserved seminiferous tubules. It is a common, although focal, pattern in many seminomas where it is admixed with the usual sheet-like and nested arrangements and does not pose any diagnostic problems in such cases. We describe, in contrast, the clinicopathologic features of 12 cases with exclusively intertubular growth and which were typically diagnostically problematic. The 12 patients lacked overt clinical signs of a primary testicular mass. Three presented with infertility, 2 with cryptorchidism, 2 with metastases, 1 with pain and testicular atrophy, and the presentation was unknown in 4. On gross examination, no mass was apparent in 9 cases with available data, but ill-defined firm areas or foci of whitish-brown discoloration were occasionally noted. Microscopically, the process was characterized by individual, dispersed tumor cells or small clusters of cells growing between the seminiferous tubules. The tumor cells were often obscured by a lymphocytic infiltrate or, less commonly, nodules of hyperplastic Leydig cells. Common associated findings were tubular atrophy with sclerosis and thickening of tubular basement membranes and intratubular germ cell neoplasia, unclassified type. Immunostains against placental-like alkaline phosphatase and c-KIT (CD117) highlighted the seminoma cells in all cases examined. In pure form, intertubular seminoma is both clinically and pathologically inconspicuous and may be misdiagnosed as atrophy, scar, or orchitis.

AB - Intertubular growth in seminoma is characterized by seminoma cells, either singly or in small clusters, between preserved seminiferous tubules. It is a common, although focal, pattern in many seminomas where it is admixed with the usual sheet-like and nested arrangements and does not pose any diagnostic problems in such cases. We describe, in contrast, the clinicopathologic features of 12 cases with exclusively intertubular growth and which were typically diagnostically problematic. The 12 patients lacked overt clinical signs of a primary testicular mass. Three presented with infertility, 2 with cryptorchidism, 2 with metastases, 1 with pain and testicular atrophy, and the presentation was unknown in 4. On gross examination, no mass was apparent in 9 cases with available data, but ill-defined firm areas or foci of whitish-brown discoloration were occasionally noted. Microscopically, the process was characterized by individual, dispersed tumor cells or small clusters of cells growing between the seminiferous tubules. The tumor cells were often obscured by a lymphocytic infiltrate or, less commonly, nodules of hyperplastic Leydig cells. Common associated findings were tubular atrophy with sclerosis and thickening of tubular basement membranes and intratubular germ cell neoplasia, unclassified type. Immunostains against placental-like alkaline phosphatase and c-KIT (CD117) highlighted the seminoma cells in all cases examined. In pure form, intertubular seminoma is both clinically and pathologically inconspicuous and may be misdiagnosed as atrophy, scar, or orchitis.

KW - Intertubular pattern

KW - Seminoma

KW - Testicular atrophy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344598929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344598929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.pas.0000132742.12221.82

DO - 10.1097/01.pas.0000132742.12221.82

M3 - Article

C2 - 15316315

AN - SCOPUS:4344598929

VL - 28

SP - 1163

EP - 1168

JO - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

SN - 0147-5185

IS - 9

ER -