Sensitivity analysis of methods for active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction using electronic databases

Xiaochun Li, Cynthia J. Girman, Susan Ofner, Changyu Shen, Kimberly G. Brodovicz, Linas Simonaitis, Nancy Santanello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The validity of conclusions from observational studies depends on decisions regarding design, analysis, data quality, and implementation. Through sensitivity analyses, we explored the impact of such decisions on balance control and risk estimates.

METHODS: Using as a template the Mini-Sentinel protocol for the active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction (MI) in association with use of antidiabetic agents, we defined cohorts of new users of metformin and second-generation sulfonylureas, baseline covariates and acute MI events using three combinations of washout and baseline periods. Using propensity-score matching, we assessed balance control and risk estimates using cumulative data for matching all patients compared with not rematching prior matches in quarterly analyses over the follow-up period.

RESULTS: A longer washout period increased the confidence in new-user status, but at the expense of sample size; a longer baseline period improved capture of covariates related to pre-existing chronic conditions. When all patients were matched each quarter, balance was improved and risk estimates were more robust, especially in the later quarters.

CONCLUSIONS: Durations of washout and baseline periods influence the likelihood of new-user status and sample size. Matching all patients tends to result in better covariate balance than matching only new patients. Decisions regarding the durations of washout and baseline periods depend on the specific research question and availability of longitudinal patient data within the database. This paper demonstrates the importance and utility of sensitivity analysis of methods for evaluating the robustness of results in observational studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-132
Number of pages3
JournalEpidemiology
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Myocardial Infarction
Databases
Sample Size
Observational Studies
Propensity Score
Preexisting Condition Coverage
Metformin
Hypoglycemic Agents
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sensitivity analysis of methods for active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction using electronic databases. / Li, Xiaochun; Girman, Cynthia J.; Ofner, Susan; Shen, Changyu; Brodovicz, Kimberly G.; Simonaitis, Linas; Santanello, Nancy.

In: Epidemiology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 130-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Li, Xiaochun ; Girman, Cynthia J. ; Ofner, Susan ; Shen, Changyu ; Brodovicz, Kimberly G. ; Simonaitis, Linas ; Santanello, Nancy. / Sensitivity analysis of methods for active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction using electronic databases. In: Epidemiology. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 130-132.
@article{53f9466ebe9b414d919a65a0b6f69ee8,
title = "Sensitivity analysis of methods for active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction using electronic databases",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The validity of conclusions from observational studies depends on decisions regarding design, analysis, data quality, and implementation. Through sensitivity analyses, we explored the impact of such decisions on balance control and risk estimates.METHODS: Using as a template the Mini-Sentinel protocol for the active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction (MI) in association with use of antidiabetic agents, we defined cohorts of new users of metformin and second-generation sulfonylureas, baseline covariates and acute MI events using three combinations of washout and baseline periods. Using propensity-score matching, we assessed balance control and risk estimates using cumulative data for matching all patients compared with not rematching prior matches in quarterly analyses over the follow-up period.RESULTS: A longer washout period increased the confidence in new-user status, but at the expense of sample size; a longer baseline period improved capture of covariates related to pre-existing chronic conditions. When all patients were matched each quarter, balance was improved and risk estimates were more robust, especially in the later quarters.CONCLUSIONS: Durations of washout and baseline periods influence the likelihood of new-user status and sample size. Matching all patients tends to result in better covariate balance than matching only new patients. Decisions regarding the durations of washout and baseline periods depend on the specific research question and availability of longitudinal patient data within the database. This paper demonstrates the importance and utility of sensitivity analysis of methods for evaluating the robustness of results in observational studies.",
author = "Xiaochun Li and Girman, {Cynthia J.} and Susan Ofner and Changyu Shen and Brodovicz, {Kimberly G.} and Linas Simonaitis and Nancy Santanello",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/EDE.0000000000000206",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "130--132",
journal = "Epidemiology",
issn = "1044-3983",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity analysis of methods for active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction using electronic databases

AU - Li, Xiaochun

AU - Girman, Cynthia J.

AU - Ofner, Susan

AU - Shen, Changyu

AU - Brodovicz, Kimberly G.

AU - Simonaitis, Linas

AU - Santanello, Nancy

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The validity of conclusions from observational studies depends on decisions regarding design, analysis, data quality, and implementation. Through sensitivity analyses, we explored the impact of such decisions on balance control and risk estimates.METHODS: Using as a template the Mini-Sentinel protocol for the active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction (MI) in association with use of antidiabetic agents, we defined cohorts of new users of metformin and second-generation sulfonylureas, baseline covariates and acute MI events using three combinations of washout and baseline periods. Using propensity-score matching, we assessed balance control and risk estimates using cumulative data for matching all patients compared with not rematching prior matches in quarterly analyses over the follow-up period.RESULTS: A longer washout period increased the confidence in new-user status, but at the expense of sample size; a longer baseline period improved capture of covariates related to pre-existing chronic conditions. When all patients were matched each quarter, balance was improved and risk estimates were more robust, especially in the later quarters.CONCLUSIONS: Durations of washout and baseline periods influence the likelihood of new-user status and sample size. Matching all patients tends to result in better covariate balance than matching only new patients. Decisions regarding the durations of washout and baseline periods depend on the specific research question and availability of longitudinal patient data within the database. This paper demonstrates the importance and utility of sensitivity analysis of methods for evaluating the robustness of results in observational studies.

AB - BACKGROUND: The validity of conclusions from observational studies depends on decisions regarding design, analysis, data quality, and implementation. Through sensitivity analyses, we explored the impact of such decisions on balance control and risk estimates.METHODS: Using as a template the Mini-Sentinel protocol for the active surveillance of acute myocardial infarction (MI) in association with use of antidiabetic agents, we defined cohorts of new users of metformin and second-generation sulfonylureas, baseline covariates and acute MI events using three combinations of washout and baseline periods. Using propensity-score matching, we assessed balance control and risk estimates using cumulative data for matching all patients compared with not rematching prior matches in quarterly analyses over the follow-up period.RESULTS: A longer washout period increased the confidence in new-user status, but at the expense of sample size; a longer baseline period improved capture of covariates related to pre-existing chronic conditions. When all patients were matched each quarter, balance was improved and risk estimates were more robust, especially in the later quarters.CONCLUSIONS: Durations of washout and baseline periods influence the likelihood of new-user status and sample size. Matching all patients tends to result in better covariate balance than matching only new patients. Decisions regarding the durations of washout and baseline periods depend on the specific research question and availability of longitudinal patient data within the database. This paper demonstrates the importance and utility of sensitivity analysis of methods for evaluating the robustness of results in observational studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937555887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937555887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000206

DO - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000206

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 130

EP - 132

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

SN - 1044-3983

IS - 1

ER -