Sex differences in response to emotion recognition training after traumatic brain injury

Duncan R. Babbage, Barbra Zupan, Dawn Neumann, Barry Willer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To examine sex differences in the effectiveness of a Stories intervention for teaching affect recognition in people with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Setting: Post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Participants: 203 participants (53 women and 150 men) with moderate to severe TBI were screened. 71 were eligible and randomized to one of three treatment conditions: two affect recognition conditions and an active control (cognition). This paper examines sex differences between the Stories intervention (n = 23, 5 women and 18 men) and the cognitive treatment control (n = 24, 8 women and 16 men). Design: Randomized controlled trial with immediate, 3- and 6-month follow-up post-tests. Interventions were 9 hours of computer-based training with a therapist. Measures: Facial Affect Recognition (DANVA2-AF); Emotional Inference from Stories Test (EIST). Results: A significant treatment effect was observed for the Stories intervention for women, who demonstrated and maintained improved facial affect recognition. In contrast, males in our sample did not benefit from the Stories intervention. Conclusion: This positive finding for the Stories intervention for females contrasts with our conclusions in a previous paper, where an analysis collapsed across sex did not reveal an overall effectiveness of the Stories intervention. This intervention warrants further research and development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalBrain Injury
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 18 2018

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Emotions
Cognition
Teaching
Therapeutics
Rehabilitation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Recognition (Psychology)
Traumatic Brain Injury
Research

Keywords

  • affect
  • Emotion recognition
  • RCT
  • sex
  • traumatic brain injury
  • treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Sex differences in response to emotion recognition training after traumatic brain injury. / Babbage, Duncan R.; Zupan, Barbra; Neumann, Dawn; Willer, Barry.

In: Brain Injury, 18.07.2018, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{75e353e777b649f396ff271f3be224bf,
title = "Sex differences in response to emotion recognition training after traumatic brain injury",
abstract = "Objective: To examine sex differences in the effectiveness of a Stories intervention for teaching affect recognition in people with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Setting: Post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Participants: 203 participants (53 women and 150 men) with moderate to severe TBI were screened. 71 were eligible and randomized to one of three treatment conditions: two affect recognition conditions and an active control (cognition). This paper examines sex differences between the Stories intervention (n = 23, 5 women and 18 men) and the cognitive treatment control (n = 24, 8 women and 16 men). Design: Randomized controlled trial with immediate, 3- and 6-month follow-up post-tests. Interventions were 9 hours of computer-based training with a therapist. Measures: Facial Affect Recognition (DANVA2-AF); Emotional Inference from Stories Test (EIST). Results: A significant treatment effect was observed for the Stories intervention for women, who demonstrated and maintained improved facial affect recognition. In contrast, males in our sample did not benefit from the Stories intervention. Conclusion: This positive finding for the Stories intervention for females contrasts with our conclusions in a previous paper, where an analysis collapsed across sex did not reveal an overall effectiveness of the Stories intervention. This intervention warrants further research and development.",
keywords = "affect, Emotion recognition, RCT, sex, traumatic brain injury, treatment",
author = "Babbage, {Duncan R.} and Barbra Zupan and Dawn Neumann and Barry Willer",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/02699052.2018.1497811",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Brain Injury",
issn = "0269-9052",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in response to emotion recognition training after traumatic brain injury

AU - Babbage, Duncan R.

AU - Zupan, Barbra

AU - Neumann, Dawn

AU - Willer, Barry

PY - 2018/7/18

Y1 - 2018/7/18

N2 - Objective: To examine sex differences in the effectiveness of a Stories intervention for teaching affect recognition in people with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Setting: Post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Participants: 203 participants (53 women and 150 men) with moderate to severe TBI were screened. 71 were eligible and randomized to one of three treatment conditions: two affect recognition conditions and an active control (cognition). This paper examines sex differences between the Stories intervention (n = 23, 5 women and 18 men) and the cognitive treatment control (n = 24, 8 women and 16 men). Design: Randomized controlled trial with immediate, 3- and 6-month follow-up post-tests. Interventions were 9 hours of computer-based training with a therapist. Measures: Facial Affect Recognition (DANVA2-AF); Emotional Inference from Stories Test (EIST). Results: A significant treatment effect was observed for the Stories intervention for women, who demonstrated and maintained improved facial affect recognition. In contrast, males in our sample did not benefit from the Stories intervention. Conclusion: This positive finding for the Stories intervention for females contrasts with our conclusions in a previous paper, where an analysis collapsed across sex did not reveal an overall effectiveness of the Stories intervention. This intervention warrants further research and development.

AB - Objective: To examine sex differences in the effectiveness of a Stories intervention for teaching affect recognition in people with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Setting: Post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Participants: 203 participants (53 women and 150 men) with moderate to severe TBI were screened. 71 were eligible and randomized to one of three treatment conditions: two affect recognition conditions and an active control (cognition). This paper examines sex differences between the Stories intervention (n = 23, 5 women and 18 men) and the cognitive treatment control (n = 24, 8 women and 16 men). Design: Randomized controlled trial with immediate, 3- and 6-month follow-up post-tests. Interventions were 9 hours of computer-based training with a therapist. Measures: Facial Affect Recognition (DANVA2-AF); Emotional Inference from Stories Test (EIST). Results: A significant treatment effect was observed for the Stories intervention for women, who demonstrated and maintained improved facial affect recognition. In contrast, males in our sample did not benefit from the Stories intervention. Conclusion: This positive finding for the Stories intervention for females contrasts with our conclusions in a previous paper, where an analysis collapsed across sex did not reveal an overall effectiveness of the Stories intervention. This intervention warrants further research and development.

KW - affect

KW - Emotion recognition

KW - RCT

KW - sex

KW - traumatic brain injury

KW - treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049983379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049983379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699052.2018.1497811

DO - 10.1080/02699052.2018.1497811

M3 - Article

C2 - 30015503

AN - SCOPUS:85049983379

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Brain Injury

JF - Brain Injury

SN - 0269-9052

ER -