Sexual Minority Women's Satisfaction with Health Care Providers and State-level Structural Support

Investigating the Impact of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Nondiscrimination Legislation

Aleta M. Baldwin, Brian Dodge, Vanessa Schick, Stephanie A. Sanders, J. Fortenberry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Structural discrimination is associated with negative health outcomes among sexual minority populations. Recent changes to state-level and national legislation provide both the opportunity and the need to further explore the impact of legislation on the health indicators of sexual minorities. Using an ecosocial theory lens, the present research addresses the relationship between structural support or discrimination and satisfaction with one's health care provider among sexual minority women. Methods: Data were drawn from an online survey of sexual minority women's health care experiences. Using the Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization to operationalize the variables in our model, we examined the relationship between state-level nondiscrimination legislation and satisfaction with provider-a widely used measure of health care quality-through regression analysis. Findings: Participants in structurally supportive states (i.e., those with nondiscrimination legislation) were more likely to disclose their sexual identity to their providers and to report higher satisfaction with their providers. The absence of nondiscrimination legislation was associated negatively with satisfaction with providers. Conclusions: Results of our study show that the external environment in which sexual minority women seek health care, characterized by structural support or lack thereof, is related to perceived quality of health care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalWomen's Health Issues
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 19 2016

Fingerprint

Transgender Persons
Legislation
Health Personnel
legislation
minority
health care
Minority Health
Quality of Health Care
Women's Health
discrimination
Delivery of Health Care
Reproductive Health
health
online survey
Lenses
Health Services
regression analysis
health service
utilization
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Maternity and Midwifery

Cite this

@article{2f33eeb543f846c89800d3a73cd8491a,
title = "Sexual Minority Women's Satisfaction with Health Care Providers and State-level Structural Support: Investigating the Impact of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Nondiscrimination Legislation",
abstract = "Purpose: Structural discrimination is associated with negative health outcomes among sexual minority populations. Recent changes to state-level and national legislation provide both the opportunity and the need to further explore the impact of legislation on the health indicators of sexual minorities. Using an ecosocial theory lens, the present research addresses the relationship between structural support or discrimination and satisfaction with one's health care provider among sexual minority women. Methods: Data were drawn from an online survey of sexual minority women's health care experiences. Using the Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization to operationalize the variables in our model, we examined the relationship between state-level nondiscrimination legislation and satisfaction with provider-a widely used measure of health care quality-through regression analysis. Findings: Participants in structurally supportive states (i.e., those with nondiscrimination legislation) were more likely to disclose their sexual identity to their providers and to report higher satisfaction with their providers. The absence of nondiscrimination legislation was associated negatively with satisfaction with providers. Conclusions: Results of our study show that the external environment in which sexual minority women seek health care, characterized by structural support or lack thereof, is related to perceived quality of health care.",
author = "Baldwin, {Aleta M.} and Brian Dodge and Vanessa Schick and Sanders, {Stephanie A.} and J. Fortenberry",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.whi.2017.01.004",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Women's Health Issues",
issn = "1049-3867",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sexual Minority Women's Satisfaction with Health Care Providers and State-level Structural Support

T2 - Investigating the Impact of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Nondiscrimination Legislation

AU - Baldwin, Aleta M.

AU - Dodge, Brian

AU - Schick, Vanessa

AU - Sanders, Stephanie A.

AU - Fortenberry, J.

PY - 2016/5/19

Y1 - 2016/5/19

N2 - Purpose: Structural discrimination is associated with negative health outcomes among sexual minority populations. Recent changes to state-level and national legislation provide both the opportunity and the need to further explore the impact of legislation on the health indicators of sexual minorities. Using an ecosocial theory lens, the present research addresses the relationship between structural support or discrimination and satisfaction with one's health care provider among sexual minority women. Methods: Data were drawn from an online survey of sexual minority women's health care experiences. Using the Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization to operationalize the variables in our model, we examined the relationship between state-level nondiscrimination legislation and satisfaction with provider-a widely used measure of health care quality-through regression analysis. Findings: Participants in structurally supportive states (i.e., those with nondiscrimination legislation) were more likely to disclose their sexual identity to their providers and to report higher satisfaction with their providers. The absence of nondiscrimination legislation was associated negatively with satisfaction with providers. Conclusions: Results of our study show that the external environment in which sexual minority women seek health care, characterized by structural support or lack thereof, is related to perceived quality of health care.

AB - Purpose: Structural discrimination is associated with negative health outcomes among sexual minority populations. Recent changes to state-level and national legislation provide both the opportunity and the need to further explore the impact of legislation on the health indicators of sexual minorities. Using an ecosocial theory lens, the present research addresses the relationship between structural support or discrimination and satisfaction with one's health care provider among sexual minority women. Methods: Data were drawn from an online survey of sexual minority women's health care experiences. Using the Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization to operationalize the variables in our model, we examined the relationship between state-level nondiscrimination legislation and satisfaction with provider-a widely used measure of health care quality-through regression analysis. Findings: Participants in structurally supportive states (i.e., those with nondiscrimination legislation) were more likely to disclose their sexual identity to their providers and to report higher satisfaction with their providers. The absence of nondiscrimination legislation was associated negatively with satisfaction with providers. Conclusions: Results of our study show that the external environment in which sexual minority women seek health care, characterized by structural support or lack thereof, is related to perceived quality of health care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013427533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013427533&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.whi.2017.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.whi.2017.01.004

M3 - Article

JO - Women's Health Issues

JF - Women's Health Issues

SN - 1049-3867

ER -