Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel

Anderson Hara, Cristiane Mariote Amaral, Luiz André Freire Pimenta, Mario Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the enamel shear bond strength of four hydrophilic adhesive systems: one multiple-bottle (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus), two one-bottle (Stae, Single Bond) and one self-etching (Etch & Prime). Materials and Methods: 120 bovine incisor teeth were obtained, embedded in polyester resin, polished to 600 grit to form standardized enamel surfaces, and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 30). Each adhesive system was used on enamel according to the manufacturer's instructions, and resin-based composite (Z100) cylinders with 3 mm diameter and 5 mm height were bonded. Specimens were stored in humid environment for 1 week, and bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine, at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Results: The mean shear bond strength values (MPa ± SD) were: Single Bond: 24.28 ± 5.27 (a); Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus: 21.18 ± 4.35 (ab); Stae: 19.56 ± 4.71 (b); Etch & Prime 3.0: 15.13 ± 4.92 (c). ANOVA revealed significant difference in means (P <0.01) and Tukey's test showed the statistical differences that are expressed by different letters for each group. It could be concluded that the self-etching adhesive system did not provide as good a bond to enamel surface, as did the one- and multiple-bottle systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-184
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Dentistry
Volume12
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Shear Strength
Dental Enamel
Adhesives
Polyesters
Incisor
Analysis of Variance
Tooth
Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus
single bond

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Hara, A., Amaral, C. M., Pimenta, L. A. F., & Sinhoreti, M. A. C. (1999). Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. American Journal of Dentistry, 12(4), 181-184.

Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. / Hara, Anderson; Amaral, Cristiane Mariote; Pimenta, Luiz André Freire; Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre Coelho.

In: American Journal of Dentistry, Vol. 12, No. 4, 08.1999, p. 181-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hara, A, Amaral, CM, Pimenta, LAF & Sinhoreti, MAC 1999, 'Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel', American Journal of Dentistry, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 181-184.
Hara A, Amaral CM, Pimenta LAF, Sinhoreti MAC. Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. American Journal of Dentistry. 1999 Aug;12(4):181-184.
Hara, Anderson ; Amaral, Cristiane Mariote ; Pimenta, Luiz André Freire ; Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre Coelho. / Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. In: American Journal of Dentistry. 1999 ; Vol. 12, No. 4. pp. 181-184.
@article{ef18eb211ec3431f9a062c3621198543,
title = "Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the enamel shear bond strength of four hydrophilic adhesive systems: one multiple-bottle (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus), two one-bottle (Stae, Single Bond) and one self-etching (Etch & Prime). Materials and Methods: 120 bovine incisor teeth were obtained, embedded in polyester resin, polished to 600 grit to form standardized enamel surfaces, and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 30). Each adhesive system was used on enamel according to the manufacturer's instructions, and resin-based composite (Z100) cylinders with 3 mm diameter and 5 mm height were bonded. Specimens were stored in humid environment for 1 week, and bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine, at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Results: The mean shear bond strength values (MPa ± SD) were: Single Bond: 24.28 ± 5.27 (a); Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus: 21.18 ± 4.35 (ab); Stae: 19.56 ± 4.71 (b); Etch & Prime 3.0: 15.13 ± 4.92 (c). ANOVA revealed significant difference in means (P <0.01) and Tukey's test showed the statistical differences that are expressed by different letters for each group. It could be concluded that the self-etching adhesive system did not provide as good a bond to enamel surface, as did the one- and multiple-bottle systems.",
author = "Anderson Hara and Amaral, {Cristiane Mariote} and Pimenta, {Luiz Andr{\'e} Freire} and Sinhoreti, {Mario Alexandre Coelho}",
year = "1999",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "181--184",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0894-8275",
publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel

AU - Hara, Anderson

AU - Amaral, Cristiane Mariote

AU - Pimenta, Luiz André Freire

AU - Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre Coelho

PY - 1999/8

Y1 - 1999/8

N2 - Purpose: To compare the enamel shear bond strength of four hydrophilic adhesive systems: one multiple-bottle (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus), two one-bottle (Stae, Single Bond) and one self-etching (Etch & Prime). Materials and Methods: 120 bovine incisor teeth were obtained, embedded in polyester resin, polished to 600 grit to form standardized enamel surfaces, and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 30). Each adhesive system was used on enamel according to the manufacturer's instructions, and resin-based composite (Z100) cylinders with 3 mm diameter and 5 mm height were bonded. Specimens were stored in humid environment for 1 week, and bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine, at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Results: The mean shear bond strength values (MPa ± SD) were: Single Bond: 24.28 ± 5.27 (a); Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus: 21.18 ± 4.35 (ab); Stae: 19.56 ± 4.71 (b); Etch & Prime 3.0: 15.13 ± 4.92 (c). ANOVA revealed significant difference in means (P <0.01) and Tukey's test showed the statistical differences that are expressed by different letters for each group. It could be concluded that the self-etching adhesive system did not provide as good a bond to enamel surface, as did the one- and multiple-bottle systems.

AB - Purpose: To compare the enamel shear bond strength of four hydrophilic adhesive systems: one multiple-bottle (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus), two one-bottle (Stae, Single Bond) and one self-etching (Etch & Prime). Materials and Methods: 120 bovine incisor teeth were obtained, embedded in polyester resin, polished to 600 grit to form standardized enamel surfaces, and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 30). Each adhesive system was used on enamel according to the manufacturer's instructions, and resin-based composite (Z100) cylinders with 3 mm diameter and 5 mm height were bonded. Specimens were stored in humid environment for 1 week, and bond strength was determined using a universal testing machine, at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Results: The mean shear bond strength values (MPa ± SD) were: Single Bond: 24.28 ± 5.27 (a); Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus: 21.18 ± 4.35 (ab); Stae: 19.56 ± 4.71 (b); Etch & Prime 3.0: 15.13 ± 4.92 (c). ANOVA revealed significant difference in means (P <0.01) and Tukey's test showed the statistical differences that are expressed by different letters for each group. It could be concluded that the self-etching adhesive system did not provide as good a bond to enamel surface, as did the one- and multiple-bottle systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033169686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033169686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 181

EP - 184

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 4

ER -